Query for Shri Sanjay Rath - 2 /Sathya Ji

[Guest guest]

Dear Satya ji

 

Thanks a lot for your interest.

I am not eligile to call myslef as an astronomer.I have elementary

understanding.Kindly read a pdf file uploaded by me under files

section.The title is Understanding Vargas.Alternatively you can find

the link ,in the new file uploaded notification message.

 

This is a part of the paper that i am working on.I hope this will

answer your queries.

 

Thanks

Pradeep

vedic astrology, Sathiyanarayana Gupta

<gupta816> wrote:

> Dear Shri.Vijayadas Pradeep,

>

> You seem to be an Astronomer cum Astrologer, where as

> I am only humble students of Astrology.Kindly explain

> my following doubt if your time permits.

>

> The natal / Rasi chart is said to be an imaginary

> replica of the zodiac which measures 360'.

> From the Rasi chart we draw innumerable imaginary

> replica called Divisional charts; do they measure

> individually 360' or less?

>

> If you say each D- chart measures 360' then why should

> we invite a debate over the drishti?

> With regards,

> D.SathiyanarayanaGupta.

>

>

> --- vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep>

> wrote:

>

> > 2)Can two planets placed astronomically ,15 degrees

> > apart, cast poorna

> > drishti(full aspect),just because we arrange them in

> > order after

> > finding their amshas.

> > If so,then why should Mahamuni Parashara waste his

> > energy over

> > aspectual rules.Can we even imagine such and still

> > be proud of our

> > intellectual heritage.

> > Why are we finding it difficult to understand views

> > of

> > Santhanam,D.V.Subbu Rao,if not the numerous local

> > scholars,(not

> > popular),who had access to noncorrupted classical

> > views,as compared to us.

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

>

> ____

> for Good

> Donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.

> http://store./redcross-donate3/