Guest guest Posted September 28, 2005 Report Share Posted September 28, 2005 Mooladhara & Linga - Clear Picture - As per Siva-samhitha- Gudathudhyanguladoordhvam mendrathudhyanguladadha Chathurangula vistharamadharam varthathe samam `Above 2 angulas from anus and below 2 angulas from genitals Mooladhara is located. It covers an area of 4 angulas'. Therefore it is clear that, Mooladhara is at the middle of Anus and genitals. Now PVR says, > What I said is that Mooladhara chakra is situated at the base of the spine. >That basically points to an area a little above anus. >So the above quote is not at all inconsistent with what I said. No. The correct statement is that it is not at all consistent with what you said. As per the above statement, the Mooladhara chakra is 2 angulas above anus and 2 angulas below linga and there is a distance of 4 angulas covered by Mooladhara. That means, the total distance from anus to linga is 2+4+2 = 8 angulas, and that Mooladhara is situated at the middle of the line joining anus and linga. Even after understanding this clear mathematical picture you are still vehemently arguing?! (for What!!). Your argument is that Mooladhara is 2 angulas above anus (in the direction of spine) and that Mooladhara is some where in the spine (in your basti area!!). To uphold this argument you reject the second part of the sloka that says that `Mooladhara is below 2 angulas from genitals'. One thing I would like to remind is that the whole concept of Chakras is connected with nadies (nerves) and not with spine (The spine comes into play only because it is one of the major paths through which the signals are communicated to brain - the major channel of energy flow. Don't assume that it alone is important, because you are not a Yogi. Neither you nor me is an authority to make statement on such things. Therefore we should depend on the statements of Rishis to have at least a theoretical understanding of such things). Here the word linga points to the linga of `Purusha'. The etymological meaning of the word Purusha is that `One who lives in body'. And it is clear that, by using the word Linga, the Rishi is neither speaking about the linga of man nor about the yoni of woman, but speaks about genitals - of man or women, in general. The important thing to understand is that Mooladharam is at the middle of the line joining Anus and Linga and therefore, the Rishis used to say that, 1) Mooladhara is in the middle of Anus. 2) Mooladhara is in the middle of Linga (genitals). If you are not convinced see the following statement in `Dhyanabindu Upanishad'. Adharakhye guda sthane pankajam yechathurdelam Thanmadhye prochyathe yoniH kamakhya sidha vanditha Yoni madhye sthitham lingam paschimabhimukham thadha `At the middle of the Chakra that is present in Anus, a lotus with 4 petals is present. The Yoni (Origin place-Mooladhara) with the name Kama is present there. It is worshiped by Sidhas (enlightened masters ). In the middle of this Yoni, the Linga is placed in the western direction (perpendicular to body)'. Will you still vehemently argue that the Mooladhara is in your basti (Naval region)? See the absurdity of your statement - >The idea I vehemently opposed is that Mooladhara chakra is in linga (genitals). >Even the quote you gave confirms that Mooladhara chakra is NOT in linga! Nobody said that Mooladhara is in Linga. But what we (persons like me or Pradeep, or authentic books like upanishads or yoga texts) say is that Mooladharam is at the middle of (i.e. equiv-distant from) Anus and Linga. If Zero deg is Sahasrara and 360 deg is the feet, then the 3 entities Anus-Mooladhara-Linga (genitals) should come in the same degree. Please don't misinterpret ancient statements or our statements and get false satisfaction. >Thanks for giving a quote that supports my view. :-) What kind of support you are getting from the above statements for your argument 'the Mooladhara is in your basti'? (I don't see any!!) Yes, you are right in stating that you were vehemently opposing some thing, because nobody said that `the Mooladhara is in Linga', and you have just imagined that statement. From the above quotes it is clear that even when Rishis say that `the Mooladhara is in the middle of Yoini/Liga' (quoted above), neither they nor the readers are not at all confused, because it is clear to all from the hundreds of quotes available from ancient texts that the Mooladhara is at the middle of the line joining Anus and Linga. Thus any statement that says that `the Mooladhara is in the middle of Anus' or that `the Mooladhara is in the middle of Linga/Yoni', just assumes a vertical view (perpendicular to body), and therefore all those statements are equally correct. Why should anybody get confused on such clear statements!! Just see one more Trisikhi-brahmana Upanishad statement if you are still confused. Apanad dvayanguladoordhvamadho medrasya thavatha Deha madhyam manushyanam hrinmadhyam thu chathushpadam `The middle of the body for humans is 2 angulas above apana (anus) and that much (i.e. 2 angulas) below medra (genitals). For 4 legged animals it is at the middle of Heart'. Is it not clear to everybody that the Rishi is mentioning the middle of the line joining anus and genitals? Why is it the middle of the body? If you consider the standing position, it is the center of gravity for the human body!!. Just see the well scientific Cartesian notation used by the Rishi in spotting this point. It is in the center of gravity if you consider the standing position, and it is at the middle of Anus and Genitals if you consider the perpendicular plane. Can anybody misinterpret such clear statements with out vested interests? I can quote many other authorities, but there is no point in doing so, if you are not ready to accept ancient authorities and view them with an uncorrupted mentality. Your earlier statement that "You cannot change my view", comes to my mind when I say this. >In my view, 8th house shows external organs such as anus and genitals, >while the 7th house shows various internal organs in their vicinity. >Thus, the mooladhara chakra area outlined in the verse above does fall >in basti area in my view. I can only smile at that statement on internal-external division, and ask, "What authority can you quote that says so?" (Of course I cannot forget that you never used to quote your authorities while arguing about such things- at least in our conversation. It is pretty understandable because of the absence of slokas that supports your view!!) >However, to keep the argument simple, let us *assume* >that all body parts from genitals to anus are covered by the 8th house (Sc). >So, we will *assume* that Mooladhara chakra, which is "2 angulas" below >genitals and "2 angulas" above anus, ends up being represented by Scorpio. Dear PVR, please don't *assume* this much!! I have already seen the article on "Sapta loka & Tala", presented by Pt.Sanjay Rath on SJC USA Annual Conference- 2003, and two of your uploaded pictures on Chakras (downloadable from the files section of the forum). I can really understand your difficulty!! (Not only you may have to reject some of the lessons taught by Rath and drop some of your previous arguments). Be a true student, but please don't discard the ancient statements and throw too much *assumptions* on the well-said statements of Rishis. If I am prompted to fix the anchor of your misinterpretations of ancient slokas on Mooladhara in this, it is not my fault - It is what the environmental evidence points to. (If this paragraph is too much personal, I beg your apologies - but still it is truth). >Now, the obvious question is: "If Sc covers genitals, anus and >'4 angulas' between them, why is the middle point of them shown >by the end of Scorpio rather than the middle of Scorpio???" Because considering the body from head to feet the Mooladhara is in the extreme potion of genital region (the perpendicular line joining Anus-Mooladhara-Linga). There are many other corroborative evidences such as, 1) End of Scorpio is the Mooladhara (origin place) of the Milky Way galaxy 2) The Anus-Mooladhara-Linga falls in same deg (same perpendicular line) 3) It is in the vertical line at the middle of body (vertical line from head to feet through the center of body). In Rasichakra the line from Pi-Ar junction to Sc-Sg junction symbolically represents such a vertical line. 4) The Moola star, which is the Mooladhara (Base of Zodiac division), is located in Sc-Sg boundary etc All these are in favor of fixing the Mooladhara of Kalapurusha at the Sc-Sg boundary (as argued by Chandrahari), rather than `the middle point of Scorpio region' (as argued by you). Neither there is any Sloka available in favor of your middle point theory nor there is any such corroborative evidence. To me, that is why it is discarded. I think that I have made my view clear. But the important point of argument was - whether the Mooladhara is in genital region or in Basti (as you said). I just wanted to make it clear that you were pouring water with sarcasm on the true efforts of Chandrahari, with out having even a glance at the statements of ancient authorities on such subjects, or the mathematical foundation of Hari's arguments, which is not good for a true seeker of knowledge. Kunda of JHora -------------- >However, when I enter this data in my computer, >I get the same lagna you do but get Kunda at 11 Ar 31' 9.08". >This is much closer to the manual calculation you gave. >I wonder why you get 14 min error >I am wondering if you made some mistake or used one ayanamsa >when noting lagna and one ayanamsa when noting kunda or something like that. >Please check once more. Yes. You are right. My apologies. > BTW, is this your chart by any chance? Yes. With Warm regards, Sreenadh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.