Chandra Haris views on Tantra/Kaalapurusha etc

[Guest guest]

Dear respected members

 

I am sharing the mail written as reply to Narasimha ji,for our

understanding and comments.

 

1. Tantra is not a sastra based on logic - ancient tantrik works are

founded on experience and the aim of Tantra is "nirvikalpa jnanam"

which is the "truth" or reality of the confounding existence.

 

2. What you have quoted as 14 Chakras have no authentic reference -

ancient Tantrik works speak of Shadchakras (in some places Sahasrara

is mentioned as the 7th which is an aberration as the Chakras are

nervous plexus that aid the ascent of Kundalini and Sahasrara is the

terminal point and not a Chakra. Sahasrara to Muladharam is the

Merudandam and extends over 240 degree) and the Muladharam marks the

bottom of the cerebro-spinal axis and longitudinally this is the end

point of Scorpio - 240 degrees. Tantrik term Muladharam arose from

the conception of a Yogic body on the apparent solar orbit. When the

Yogic cosmo-biological or micro-macrocosmic experience was given

mathematical _expression using the correlation between Prana-Surya

and Surya, Mula star was found to be at 240 degree - marking

Muladharam. In fact the planetary transits over

Mula (Lambda Scorpii) can be experienced over a Tantrik body. More

details I hope you have found in my papers like "Geometry of

circannual rhythm".

 

3. As I have mentioned in some later works which I have sent to you,

Kalapurusha is a Yogi engaged in Pranayama and Muladharam is the

seat of Apaana. Apaana is related to Mrtyu and as is well known 240

degree is the Mrtyustana. It marks also genitals - Linga and Yoni

and hence the tantrik tradition worship Mahakala as Linga-Yoni. All

these concepts had their origin from the Yogic experience of human

nervous system. I am not going into the details of the autonomous

nervous system etc and what feel a Yogi gain of the nervous system -

how it is related to the encrypted data of previous karma and births

etc. Such occult aspects can be understood only by experience.

 

Thanks

Pradeep