Guest guest Posted August 30, 2005 Report Share Posted August 30, 2005 Dear Prabodh, Thanks. It was thought provoking - an objective view of a real scholar. You said: - > Even if accept that Mool star qualify as zodiac reference, >it is not clear to me why should it be related with Muladhar chakra. > We have two things. >1) Mool Nakshatra as base of Zodiac and >2) Muladhar situated at above 2 angulas from anus and below 2 >angulas from genitals. >This will be junction of Vrischick and Dhanu. So there is >one-to-one mapping of >Mool star and place of Muladhar chakra. But to say that >Mool nakshatra is named as Mool because it has >one-to-one mapping with the place of Muladhar chakra >in Human body is not too convincing. Had it been so then >possibly we might have had more nakshatras with some >resemblance to other names of chakras. But we don't have >any such etymological reference of any nakshatra name >and chakra. So it seems that it is just a matter of coincidence >that Mool nakshatra & Muladhar chakra can be mapped. >Of course I may totally wrong but if see etymological >reference with one nakshatra and one chakra then >consistency of the logic will demand some etymological >reference with other nakshatras and chakras. There are several things to be answered. Let us subdivide the questions into many. 1) Does Moola Star qualify to be the base of the Zodiac? If so how? 2) Who is the person that related the names of Moola star and Mooladhara? Why? 3) What are the etymological meanings of Nakshatra names? 4) Can I point to an etymological concurrency with other nakshatras and chakras? 5) What about other Chakra systems? I will try to answer these questions. 1) Does Moola Star qualify to be the base of the Zodiac? If so how? - Chandrahari is a person who conducted an in-depth study of the Surya- sidhantha and the fundamental concepts from which the Rasichakram (Zodiac) originated. He found that Zodiac is Mooladhara Rahu-Sikhi Chakra. This means that the fixed reference frame called Zodiac is mathematically derived considering the rhythmical movement of Rahu and Sikhi and also by considering Moola star as a fixed reference point of zodiac division. He proves it mathematically based on Suryasidhantha. (You should remember here that we are speaking about how the fixed frame of reference called Zodiac was originally sub-divided into Signs and Stellar divisions) As per his diction- "The first stellar division (first star) is Jyeshta that falls between the line joining the hypothetical Equinox line of old-Suryasidhantha (the line joining 60 deg Vernal equinox and 240 deg fiducial star Moola) and the line joining the actual Equinox line at Yugadi (line joining 46 deg 40 min and 226 deg 40 min). The first rasi division is falls between the line joining the hypothetical Sayana Rahu-Sikhi (line joining 300 deg Sayana-Sikhi/planetary conjunction point and 120 deg Sayana Rahu) and the hypothetical Ecliptic (line joining 330 deg and 150 deg) of Old-Suryasidhantha. Thus forms the Zodiac with stars 13 deg 20 min each and Signs with 30 deg each". Don't get confused. Here he is not speaking about predictive astrology, but about the mathematical division of the Zodiac. He is not saying that the first star is not Aswathi or that the first sign is not Aris. He is speaking about, `how that division originally occurred'. (Taking away from the context any one can miss-interpret such statements) Any one who wants to have a better understanding of Hari's concepts should read his works. From such studies it becomes clear that Moola star qualify to be the base of the Zodiac divisions. I am fully supportive of his ideas on this because, I see no other such sincere studies based on ancient sidhanthas that comes to a clear-cut identification on - `how the zodiac originally got divided into signs and stellar divisions'. 2) Who is the person that related the names of Moola star and Mooladhara? Why? ----------------------------- I never said that Moola nakshatra is named as Moola because it has one-to-one mapping with the place of Mooladhar chakra in Human body or the body of Kalapurusha. I said that 'Moola star has one-to-one mapping with the place of Mooladhar chakra in the body of Kalapurusha'. What you said is Hari's concept. When the thoughts of Chandra-Hari bombarded with concepts such as Mooladhara Rahu-Sikhi Chakra and Rhythm of the universe (rhythm of solar system, biological clock, circadian rhythm etc), some other striking similarities came to his mind. Some examples would be: - (i) Moola is the base of zodiac division - Mooladhara is the base point from where yoga starts. (ii) Horoscope is also called Kundalini - In yoga also Kundalini (serpent power) is important. (iii) Rahu-Sikhi (Serpents - Kalasarpa) is the underlying factor of Rasichakra - Kundalini in yoga is also symbolized as serpent. (iv) Kalapurusha is a concept in astrology - Sankhya and Yoga also speak about purusha. (v) Jyothisha and Tantra are based on the equivalence of Pindandam (Microcosm) and Brahmandam (Macrocosm). (vi) The universe is Rhythmic - The human body is also in rhythm with universe. [This needs further clarification. Prana means 4 seconds. According to yoga and upanishads one day of a human body means 21600 prana. 3600 x 60 = 21600 min] All these similarities prompted Hari to suggest a co-relation between the Yoga/Tanthra and astrology. It was his statement that - "Moola nakshatra is named as Moola because it has one-to-one mapping with the place of Mooladhar chakra of Kalapurusha". (I would like to take my time in accepting or rejecting this co-relation of Yoga and Astrology. I am not in haste). If you go through the works of Chandrahari you will see the pain-staking efforts he has taken in making such a study. He is a truly sincere man and is an asset to the astrological community. PVR was just discarding that whole effort with the erroneous statement - "To me, Mooladhara chakra of Kala Purusha being at 240 deg or being at the end of his genitals is a totally unappealing concept. ... I know for a fact where MY Mooladhara chakra is and ........." he says that it is in his "basti (the area just above genitals)". I was just reacting to that statement. We should respect and value a person and his efforts, if he disserves it. (Even if we agree with it or not!). PVR was violating this rule (and that also without making sufficient study of the concept), and it is to that I have reacted. [As far as I am concerned, still now I am not sure whether this Yoga/ Tanthra concepts and Astrology are deeply related or not. As I would like to take my time and watch with patience what the efforts of scholars like Chandrahari has in store for us as the future results of their study. I am not ready to fully support/reject the co-relations Hari points to. I may need more material, and proof to convince my mind. But I would strongly appreciate the efforts of this man, Chandrahari, in co-relating the subjects Yoga/Tantra and Astrology. Whether it turns out to be base-full/base-less is totally another issue. Even though I am not ready to fully-accept the Tantra-Astrology co-relation he is pointing to, I fully accept the rhythmic co-relation of human body and universe he points to, as it is a fundamental concept in astrology. (I reserve my further comments on such things for the future. Being a common man, on all knowledge branches, I would like to depend on ancient astrological authorities, logic, and advice of guru's to form my opinion. On religion and ethics, I value the sound from with-in rather than authorities. But such points are not of any concern here)] 3) What are the etymological meanings of Nakshatra names? ------------------------ Now comes the question what are the etymological meanings to the nakshatra names? Let us look at some of the Nakshatra names. 1. Aswathi: Shows that it has 2 main stars, and that it is good for medicine related endures. 2. Bharani: Shows that once rains started in this stellar division, as the word originated from the word `Apa-bharani'. 3. Krithika: Shows that this group of stars has the shape of a foldable knife, and also that it contains many stars. `Bahula' meaning `many' is another name of this star-group. It contains many stars. 4. Rohini: means red. As per modern science it is a red-giant (an old star that was bigger than sun). It has another name `Prajapathi' meaning Brahma. Brahma (the creator) was considered to be born in Rohini at the beginning of Yuga. 5. Mrigasira: Means head of a dear. It points to a Vedic story related to Brahma, and to the shape of star-group. It has another name `Agrahayani' which shows that once year commenced from this star. 6. Ardra: Meaning `Wet'. Shows that once rain season started in this star. Its old name is `Bahu' meaning `arms' shows that it is one of two main stars of this group. 7. Punarvasu: Meaning `many bright stars'. Yes. This group contains many bright stars. 8. Pushya: Means expand. The cancer sign is also termed `bee hive'. Pushya is a Nebula as per modern science. It has another name `Devejyabham' showing that it good for all deeds related to god. 8. Aslesha: Shows that this star together with many other stars forms the shape of a snake. It also means `embrace'. As per Hari, at yugadi the hypothetical line joining 300 deg Sayana-Sikhi and 120 deg Sayana Rahu was in the junction of Cancer and Leo. 9. Makha: Means King. Yema is the god of Time. This shows that Makha has some importance in the forming the stellar divisions, and Hari shows us what it is. 10. Poorva Phalguni: Means it the eastern star of the 2 main stars seen in that part of the sky. It had another name `Arjuni' meaning `one that create clouds' (which later get discarded), which shows that once rain season started in this stellar division. 11. Uthara Phalguni: Means the western star of the 2 main stars seen in that part of the sky. It has another name `Seenivali', which as per Semitic language means `a tail in the sky', and as per Sanskrit means `the new moon day'. This name points to some astronomical relevance. OK. The list goes on. If anybody is interested in it, I will supply the full. I think this much is sufficient to point to the fact that the etymological connotation has some importance always. 4) Can I point to an etymological concurrency with other nakshatras and chakras? - The answer is - No, I can't see any. It may be a weak link in Hari's argument. That is, of the three main arguments, such as, 1) Moola is the root star considered for zodiac division. 2) Moola has a co-relation with Mooladhara and thus to Tantra 3) There is a rhythmic co-relation between the human body and the universe. One can argue that, the 2nd argument is probably weak, in the absence of etymological reference relating other nakshatras and chakras. (But we shouldn't forget that Hari supplies much supplementary data for the co-relation of astrology and Tantra. There might/might-not evolve further study results that might undermine our primary judgment) Also remember that, this doesn't undermine the eligibility of Moola to be the root star of Zodiac division, as that part is proved mathematically based on Suryasidhantha. 5) What about other Chakra Systems? -- You said - >As regarding chakras, I don't know much as I am not well read but I remember in >Valmiki Ramayan in the first Vanavasa of Shri Ram and Laxyamana, >rishi Vishwamitra taught them following Chakras. >1) Dandachakra 2) Dharmachakra 3) Kalachakra 4) Vishnuchakra 5) Indrachakra. >We know that Indrachakras are nothing but 7 chakras in the jeevatma >which begin with Muladhar and end at Sahastrakar. It is said that true yogi will >experience all these chakras....while doing abhyasa. I have no knowledge of this >but just wanted to indicate that there is a reference in Valmiki Ramayana of the >chakras other than usual Indrachakras. Sorry. My knowledge is insufficient to give any explanation. I am not am expert in this Chakra business. It is only when you say, I understand that the 7 chakras are also called Indrachakra. I should borrow your words - "I don't know much" (about all the other chakras), I was just reacting to a situation from within my knowledge. Let Goddess Saraswathy bless us all, With warm regards, Sreenadh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.