Four Yes or No Questions (Cn and Le Riddle...)

[Guest guest]

Dear Raman,

 

I am quoting from the PDF file you uploaded: "If the portion of the sign is

ruled by sun, it corresponds to day sign in Hora chart and if by moon, night

sign."

 

Let me ask a few straight-forward yes or no questions to make my point.

 

(1) With Virgo being an even sign, do you agree that the first half of Virgo is "ruled by Moon"?

 

(2) Do you agree that the second half of Virgo is "ruled by Sun"?

 

(3) Do you agree that the second half of Virgo corresponds to a "day sign in Hora chart"?

 

(4) Do you agree that Cn is a night sign (i.e. not a day sign)?

 

If your answer to all these questions is yes, how can then the second half of

Virgo correspond to Cn in Hora chart? In your original table, you mapped the

second half of Vi to Le. But, in the latest table, you changed it to Cn and

that breaks the rule I quoted from you above. There is a similar issue with the

second half of Libra.

 

If you are uncomfortable dealing with these questions, you may not answer. I

will be happy to drop this thread. I am writing only because I am assuming that

you did not understand my point.

 

May Jupiter's light shine on us,

Narasimha

-------------------------------Free Jyotish

lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.netFree Jyotish software

(Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.orgSri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website:

http://www.SriJagannath.org-------------------------------

 

> Dear Narasimha Rao,> > > > The dichotomy of day/night is created by Sun and

Moon and the zodiac > > is divided into two halves. Each planet except Sun and

Moon own one > > day sign and one night sign each. The irony of this whole

thing is > > that Sun and Moon created this whole dichotomy, but they need to >

> combine into ONE entity in order to take part in this dichotomy!> > > > While

constructing the Hora chart, we clearly differentiate between Sun and> Moon. We

have to continue with this principle in order to maintain> consistency. The

allotment of signs is based on Sun and Moon lordship and> not on Day signs and

Night signs. We have considered Day/Night strong signs> based on the ownership

of Sun/Moon and not the reverse.> > > > If we consider the normal Hora chart,

we find that the planets go into> Cancer and Leo. We could take a clue from

this and consider the Sun and the> Moon as two separate grahas and not one.> >

> > Om Tat Sat,> > > > Raman Suprajarama> > > > > > -----Original

Message----->

[] On> Behalf Of pvr108> Thursday,

August 18, 2005 7:02 PM> > Subject:

[vedic astrology] Cn and Le Riddle (Re: (Multiple> replies) RE:

New method...)> > > > Dear Raman,> > > > > For Sun and Moon, there are no day

signs and night signs. Hence we > > consider> > > Cancer for Moon and Leo for

Sun. This ensures consistency.> > > > I argue that this does not ensure

consistency, but makes things > > highly inconsistent. You are mapping both the

halves of Vi to night > > signs (Ge and Cn) and both the halves of Li to day

signs (Li and > > Le). This is a total collapse of the paradigm of each sign

mapped to > > one day sign and one night sign. If the only reason for breaking

the > > paradigm is that Sun and Moon have only sign, why can't we combine > >

them so that there are two signs now?> > > > The dichotomy of day/night is

created by Sun and Moon and the zodiac > > is divided into two halves. Each

planet except Sun and Moon own one > > day sign and one night sign each. The

irony of this whole thing is > > that Sun and Moon created this whole

dichotomy, but they need to > > combine into ONE entity in order to take part

in this dichotomy!> > > > In JHora, I will give Raman Hora the way you defined

it now. After > > all, it is your research. But I will also give a variation

based on > > the Cn/Le change I am suggesting. Ironically, you too had it the

way > > I like it in your original rough draft that was uploaded!> > > >

Despite my strong reservation about your treatment of Cn and Le, I > > think

the whole idea of combining two seemingly disjoint statements > > of

Varahamihira into one coherent teaching is quite brilliant and I > > look

forward to more contributions from you to the knowledge pool of > > Jyotisha!>

> > > May Jupiter's light shine on us,> > Narasimha> >

-------------------------------> > Free

Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net> > Free Jyotish

software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org> > Sri Jagannath Centre

(SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org> >

-------------------------------