BPHS/Hora/Lagnashadvargake

[Guest guest]

Namaste Panditji and learned members

 

I am not doing justice to myself nor jyotish by staying out of this

discussion,which i had initiated.

The shloka which the very translator of BPHS had concerns about, is

the last ray of hope,for those, who have advanced own theories and

involved in profilerations of such.

 

The concern was not Late Santhanam's fancy or fantasy, as compared

to one ''imaginary'' zodiac,per division of Rashi.His concerns were

based on Mahamuni parasharas definition about aspects.In his book

Deva Keralam he has reiterated this.Thus it is our duty to look into

the basics,and try to reconcile this shloka.Let us do it.

 

Hora is one among the shadvargas.Hora is one half of any Rashi/Sign

and can be ruled only by sun and moon.(Source - Mahamuni Parashara -

Author BPHS).Reason is obvious - Shiva/Shakthi,Ardha-

nareeshwara,Para/Apaara,father/mother or similar.Even if we dont

know the reason,there is no need to invent/fancy one - let us simply

listen to Parashara.

 

Now if we analyze this Hora as a chart, as some are doing in the

case of various divisionals,( advertently/inadvertently),do we get a

chart or aspect?All the planets will be either in Leo or/and

Cancer.Pls ask,those who are conlcuding, based on this single

shloka,to explain and reconcile, ASPECT/HOUSES.Now we can see,those

who have been advocating authenticity of Parashara and spreading

aura of sarcasm, coming up with new Hora charts/definitions.Another

amsha called Trimshamsha is also part of shadvargas.Sun and Moon

does not have Trimshamsha ownerships, as per Mahamuni

Parashara.Similarly Hora is owned only by Sun and Moon.

 

Thus it is pretty clear that sage had mentioned '' aspecting or

joining'' in a single shloka.He expected us to have the common sense

to understand, where is aspect possible, as he has clearly given the

rules for the same.

 

If one cannot explain/reconcile Aspects/Houses in Hora(which is a

part of the said shloka and last hope), will they withdraw their

claim and stop sarcasm.Being an optimist, i still have hope.

 

(Amshas of Moola Trikona Rashi and Moola Trikona itself) or (Amshas

of Exaltation Rashi and deep Exaltation) are different things.The

scholar in Narasimha does not need my help to understand this

elementary principle. Sage defines divisionals as various divisions

of a Rashi/Sign.Unfortunately some have taught - Rashi chakra as the

first divison,though as per Mahamuni,it can be any

sign.Any ''dullest'' student(courtesy, shri Sanjay Prabhakaran) can

understand this simple definition,unless one wants to fantasise.

 

If we read texts like Saravali, a detailed one, we can find numerous

references on amshas of bhava lords, but no divisional

charts.Parashara has explained 9th lords effect by looking at

various amshas without considering any charts.Thus I too feel shri

Narasimha has not understood my concerns.The one who has understood,

is unfortunately, silent.

 

Respect

Pradeep