Guest guest Posted July 15, 2005 Report Share Posted July 15, 2005 Respected members, I post newly the document about Tagore to correct a preceding format error. This report was written as Sri Chandra Hari reply to the posting of Sri Sanjay Rath on the net. As Sri Chandra Hari it is usual to say "we need to have a scientific approach in logical analysis instead of pursuing some wrong logic derived from the intuitive success in giving some predictions". Blessings Paolo Didier -- Sri Ravindranatha Tagore 07.05.1861, 0251 LMT, 0227 IST at 22N40, 88E30 Lagna Chand. Sukra Budha Ravi Kuja Sikhi Rāśi Guru Sani Rāhu Lagna 333057’ Ravi 23037’ Chandra 349048’ Kuja 59025’ Budha 07007’ Guru 115013’ Śukra 22021’ Śani 130000’ Rāhu 264006’ Śikhi 84006’ Sikhi Sani Budha Guru Navāmśa Lagna Chandra Ravi Rāhu Sukra Kuja Ayanāmsa Used: 22039’ (Hari) Budha Guru Budha Kuja Rahu Guru Rāsix10 Career Lagna Rāsix7 Children Nodes Chandra Chandra Ravi Kuja Sukra Sani Sikhi Sani Lagna Ravi Sukra v Profile of Planetary Influence Daśa at birth: Budha: 13 years - 00 months - 02 days: Up to 09 May 1874 § Sikhi ® From 09 May 1874 to 09 May 1881 § Sukra ® 09 May 1881 to 09 May 1901 § Surya ® 09 May 1901 to 09 May 1907 § Chandra ® 09 May 1907 to 09 May 1917 § Kuja ® 09 May 1917 to 09 May 1924 § Rāhu ® 09 May 1924 to 09 May 1942 This is a chart where the Rasi and Navamsa are the same in Raman, Lahiri and the ayanamsa I have proposed. But the Rasix10, dasamsa Lagna is different for Raman ayanamsa as his Lagna will be 333-57+2-11 = 336-08. Dasamsa Lagna will be Simha. In Saptamsa Raman’s data gives Tula as Lagna. Same is the situation with Lahiri. So at the very basic level, a query arises with reference to ayanamsa – 1. Which is the Saptamsa Lagna of Sri Tagore’s horoscope, Kanya or Tula? Both Rasis are heavily afflicted and the judgment can be subjective unless some event points to Budha or Sukra as having the lordship of children. 2. Which is the Dasamsa – Rasix10 or the Mihira’s D10? We must think over. Course of Life: Voyage to Europe – 18th year - September 1878: Ketu (dasa) – Guru (bhukti): Lahiri puts the event in Sani (bhukti) – Which is the right choice, Guru or Sani for the voyage for studies, career, across the seas? Sani of Simha takes one to the hills or to the sea? Guru of Kataka versus Sani of Simha – which one is more appropriate for sea voyage? Event is going abroad, yes, Sani can cause the event by 12th lordship – but contrast the nature of the event and Rasi-seelam. Journey is for career and across the sea – life in sea – perhaps it took weeks to reach UK. Which planet could have given such a life in the ship, in the ocean? Guru is in exchange with Chandra – two watery signs influence Guru and Mahayoga – can there be any other candidate to cause a voyage across the sea? Just think over, I have no assertions. If suppose we take Sani as causing this voyage, another query comes – Why the Guru bhukti failed to cause any development in his career despite being 10th lord exalted in 5th in exchange with Chandra? Sanjay says, it is improper to travel during Guru, Tagore was in ship – in a moving Home in the ocean. Separation from home is well explained by Dasa lord Ketu in the 4th. Raman’s ayanamsa – no comments. Sukra-Sukra, in astrology anything can be justified by inventing logic because a great majority has no scientific thinking and Upasana. Marriage 9 December 1883: Sukra (d) – Sukra (b): Kalatrakaraka and own varga in Navamsa are the only factors, I can point out. If Surya could cause marriage by virtue of association with Sukra and Budha by partaking their qualities and duties, why didn’t Sukra cause marriage in his own bhukti? We must apply logic fully to churn out the truth. § Surya could have caused marriage, had there been failure by Sukra – not by virtue of association but because he is lord of Navamsa-Lagna. Of course, affliction of Surya by Rahu was an affliction over his marital life. § We must note that the Kalatrakaraka is in own varga in Navamsa and thus favorable to cause marriage. § Imagine a situation of 1881 – when an astrologer could have predicted Tagore’s marriage – in Sukra-Sukra that is unfolding or could anyone have said: Sukra cannot cause marriage in his bhukti and Surya, the 6th Lord shall cause marriage? § If Raman’s Venus-Moon is correct, what is Raman’s explanation for Venus and Sun not causing marriage in their bhuktis? Raman needed such things as stellar influence to justify his ayanamsa. What for is then Rasi and Vargas? Stellar lordship is above Rasi and Varga? Raman’s ayanamsa can be justified only with Raman’s astrology. 1886 – His daughter Madhuri Lata was born in Sukra-Chandra (b): Whole of 1886 Chandra bhukti prevailed. With Raman marriage in Moon and Child in Rahu – and the chart has the exchange of first lord Guru and 5th lord Chandra? § Sanjay has to hope for the event before June 1886 to place the birth of daughter in Venus-Moon? Justifies Mars too. Good. § But while justifying Mars, should we not think as to why Chandra did not give him a daughter during its bhukti despite being lord of 5th in exchange with Guru? Unless, we answer this part, the predictive logic cannot be complete. § So all the three ayanamsas may be explaining child birth but Lahiri & Raman cannot explain as to why Chandra did not give him a child during its bhukti or why Sukra did not cause marriage to Tagore in Sukra bhukti. Only an integrated evaluation can lead us to the truth. 22.12.1901: Shantiniketan – Surya (d): Chandra (b): Shantiniketan was born out of his mind – the lord of which is in mutual exchange with 10th lord Guru. Mahayoga caused by Chandra was operating to enable him to create an Institution. 5th is the house of Vidya and the lord of Vidya formed mahayoga with Karmapati. Rx10, not the wrong Mihira conventional D10 has to be looked into for career. Chandra is the lord of Rx10 Lagna. Sanjay has used the wrong Mihira D10 to take dasamsa lagna as Dhanu and Kataka as 8th. Niyati cannot be so foolish – see the beauty of astrology – Kataka, the source of his talents is the dasamsa Lagna and Moon its lord is in Dhanu, the 10th house of Rasi. Mahayoga involving 1&5 thus gets related to 5&10 in Dasamsa and so he created an educational institution. Death of Wife – Mrinalini Devi on 23.11.1902: Raman places the event in Sun-Sat. Lahiri has the tragic event in Surya-Guru (b): How can this be explained? § Lahiri - How can Surya (d) – Guru (b) kill the wife? § Sun – Rahu (b) – I will put the blame on the affliction by Rahu on Navamsa-Lagnapati. Lagna had navamsa in 6th with the lord afflicted by Rahu – this is a very correct principle – afflicted lord of navamsa Lagna affects marital life. § Rahu’s lordship, I don’t use. With my experience of the tradition, I am not aware of a logic like Rahu is 7th lord or similar. Daughter Renuka died in 1903 September: Sun – Guru (b), Karako bhavanasaya: Rx7 also explains the event – Surya and Guru in Kendras in Saptamsa has evil propensities in respect of 5th house. Lahiri places in Sun-Sat(b): Can be well explained. Saturn afflicts the Rx7 Lagna of Lahiri. Younger son died in 1907 November. Chandra-Chandra: Chandra as putrapati does not favor male issues – 5th house sandwiched between malefics. Chandra-Kuja or Rahu as per Lahiri – Classical rules on 5th house justify both the productive and destructive roles of Chandra and Guru in respect of children. Nobel Prize: September 1913: Chandra – Budha (b): Rx10, Budha is quite dominant and influence Chandra and Guru. Of course, Budha is in 12th of Rx10Lagna and so he used the money for social work. Award was for his work in literature and Chandra and Budha are the most suited as per dasamsa. § Lahiri requires Ketu – but Ketu is in the house of Budha and then why Budha did not get him the honour? If Ketu can why not his master Budha? If Ketu could bring such an event why Budha had to be a dull period? § Budha brought the honor and Ketu saw him under limelight. Can’t this be the correct interpretation? Doctorate November 1913 – again Chandra-Budha. Death 7 August 1941: Rahu-Kuja: § Sanjay, earlier said that –kaarakobhavanasaya is not applicable to such a brilliant Jupiter. If so how can Guru in such auspicious yoga kill him? § We can justify saying that he had Moksha and so 10th lord in 5th was the most appropriate agent to enable his crossing of Akasa Ganga. We must have a whole some look – which ayanamsa gives a smooth explanation – not only justifies but also not generating questions like the ones I have raised like why Sukra (b) did not cause marriage? Why Chandra (b) did not give a son? Other issues related to ayanamsa & zero point, I have already mailed you the materials. I have not much botheration about ayanamsa. There was a time when I thought that people will accept the truth immediately. It was Her Grace that none did accept it. So I have studied further under Her and I experience Her grace. My astrology or Upasana is not that of Sri Raman – the fact that he could not accept Lahiri Ayanamsa speaks… His institution did good and bad things – his ego perpetuated a wrong ayanamsa. I will never commit that mistake. I want people to check both Lahiri and the value, I have given. Also, other aspects. I have submitted a report in a Kerala conference that outlines the physical effects of Zodiac that can be tested. 14th Night 22:55 is Makara Samkrama, my disciples will be testing the impact of Samkrama over their physical body. You have said that the Rahu-Sikhi Chakra was known to all. What is Samkrama? Has anyone said it? Mihira or others that it can be experienced on the body? If yes, why Raman and others could not so far ask the medical men to come and see on his body the samkrama? What is Surya-samkrama? Orbit is circular and the body Surya/Prthvi is always moving. Where it does samkramam – change the path? What the dictionary say about the word meaning of samkramam? Sūrya-samkramam is not in the sky. It is the Prāna-Sūrya that undergoes Samkrama from Idā to Piňgala or viceversa when Sun moves across certain points which we have come to know as boundaries of signs. Zodiac is the mathematical expression of the experience of the Yogis …Jyotisha is not jargon and Jyoti is not the sparks seen on the heaven – Jyoti of Jyotisha is experience. If my Guru permits me, tomorrow, I can prove before the world that Jyotisha is testable – influence of Sun and Moon is testable. This influence has a geometry and that is Mūlādhāra Chakra. I am not confused because of Her grace. I don’t care about ayanamsa too. I care only for that Jyoti and that Jyoti needs Mūlādhāra Rāhu Sikhi Chakra. I am aware of the Sakti Pithams in Orissa but I have not yet visited below Kalighat and above Kancheepuram on the east coast. I am not writing to advocate any path. Be in your path with eyes open to see the Jyoti of Jyotihsastra. That’s all. She made me do the work and she has jobs for everyone. This effort to share my thinking with you is also her inspiration and my duty to her for giving me a glance of her Jyoti. I feel guilty on the suspicion that whether my ego is acting or not? No ego, no claim and no prophet as you wrote – Her most humble servant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.