Guest guest Posted July 14, 2005 Report Share Posted July 14, 2005 Dear Energumen/panditji Continuing, is it not possible that there was no other soul born in near proximity of Gandhi's, Hitler's, and other notable people's birth. Definitely there must have been a birth near Gandhiji's birth time with same rasi and navamsa, who was not his brother or even a distant cousin. THen why Gandhiji is Gandhiji and not others? The same applies to all guys born with same rasi and navamsa, and divisional lords(till Shastyamsa) as of the famous people. Houses in divisionals is the only way to solve the riddle till a more novel method is found out. Best wishes partha vedic astrology, "V.Partha sarathy" <partvinu@g...> wrote: > Dear Energumen > > What i meant was a range of latitude and longitude also. > best wishes > partha > > > vedic astrology, Energumen <vernalagnia> > wrote: > > Are you sure, dear Partha? > > > > If my understanding is ok, it's only on a latitude belt that all > lagna-related matters, divisional lagnas included, change quite > drastically. I'll take an example that should be familiar to you. The > 23N latitude of your country runs from roughly Kandla to Imphal. Now > what belt of this latitude would have unvarying navamshas? > > > > I'm certain you've written something that I didn't quite fathom > properly. Correct? > > > > "V.Partha sarathy" <partvinu@g...> wrote: > > For a particular latitude belt, the navamsa wont change, in some > cases other divisionals also wont change. > > > > Energumen > > > > ----- > > 45.1% of all statistics are wrong > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 14, 2005 Report Share Posted July 14, 2005 And while it's tempting to consider charts of the famous and infamous, let's not forget that each of us is unique, just like everyone else :^) "V.Partha sarathy" <partvinu > wrote: Dear Energumen/panditjiContinuing, is it not possible that there was no other soul born in near proximity of Gandhi's, Hitler's, and other notable people's birth.Definitely there must have been a birth near Gandhiji's birth time with same rasi and navamsa, who was not his brother or even a distant cousin. THen why Gandhiji is Gandhiji and not others? The same applies to all guys born with same rasi and navamsa, and divisional lords (till Shastyamsa) as of the famous people.Houses in divisionals is the only way to solve the riddle till a more novel method is found out.Best wishesparthaEnergumen-----45.1% of all statistics are wrongDo You ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.