Guest guest Posted May 31, 2005 Report Share Posted May 31, 2005 Dear Mr Rath, I have not experimented on the system of astrology you follow, but for Virgo Lagna, Mercury is weak in the 7th house not due to its placement but due to its state of debilation affecting all areas of life wrt to Lagna. For Mithuna Lagna like I have, apart from mercury its the 7th lord Jupiter and its placement and strength is important for multiple partners along with venus mars and nodes. By the way in modern times whether in open or behind the closet, human sexuality prevails and such theories of multiple partners dont apply. i have actively interacted with hundereds of people with multiple partners over a period of their life, In modern times its more important to analyze the INTENTION and DESIRE(two timing etc) behind such multiple partners and relationships and not the act of having multiple partners or relationship. Regards Amit DOB: April 23rd 1976 8:55 AM, Jamshedpur India. vedic astrology, "Pt. Sanjay Rath" <guruji@s...> wrote: > > > om namo bhagavate vāsudevāyaDear UtpalNeed not be.What connection does lagna have to the kama bhava matters of mithuna rasi? Infact if mithuna is the lagna then the native has early realisation of this and understands this, provided Mercury is strong. I have found most mithuna lagna people to be concerned about and serious about not having such vices. If Mithuna is in the 2nd house from UL then you will see how this thing comes out, also with mithuna in A7 or such areas. I have found that mihuna in 2nd from UL never fails to give multiple partners, especially in countries and places where the rasi is very strong like big cities. Best WishesSanjay Rath15B Gangaram Hospital Road, New Delhi 110060 IndiaPhone +91-11- 25717162, http://srath.com -Utpal Pathak [vedic_pathak]Pt. Sanjay Rath[guruji@s...]Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 05:47 PM:Re: [vedic astrology] Re: Marana Karaka Sthana of Mercury (Shri ChandrShekhar) > Dear Sanjay Rathji, Thank you for your note and good explanation of Mercury and it's MK Stana. Unfortunately I belong to Mithuna Lagna but always saved by the lord from all the Vices attached to it. thanks again for rememberig me. respectfully yours, Utpal Pathak > > "Pt. Sanjay Rath" <guruji@s...> wrote: > > om namo bhagavate vāsudevāyaDear Utpal and Chandrasekhar jiI have consistantly held that there are two opinions about the marana sthana of Mercury - perhaps because of the peculiar dualistic nature of Mercury. Look at its houses - Gemini is the most impure indicating prostitution and what not all evils and look at Virgo the purest of the pure. Perhaps the marana sthana has to do with these two houses unlike the other planets. Perhaps the marana sthana of Mercury in the 7th house related to Virgo where the purity or *virginity* of the virgin is lost and the 4th house relates to the marana sthana for Gemini where the avidya and evil comes to an end due to home. In fact youngsters are always concerned or *controlled* by the awareness or some fear of home - parents.Regards and thanks for the probeSanjay15B Gangaram Hospital Road, New Delhi 110060 IndiaPhone 11-25717162, http://srath.com - Utpal Pathak [vedic_pathak]vedic astrology: Saturday, May 28, 2005 09:59 AM:Re: [vedic astrology] Re: Marana Karaka Sthana of Mercury (Shri ChandrShekhar) > Dear Chandrashekhar Ji, This is a very important post for me. It'll go long way to understand MK's effects in actual life. I was confused about Marankarka placement of planets and it's parctical effects on the natives as i have seen that many people have planets in MK and they have not suffered in the karkatatva or bhava results. now i got the hint to test it further with the malefic Association with the said planets. regards, utpal > > Chandrashekhar <chandrashekhar46> wrote:Dear Narasimha, > You are right. Jataka Parijata does say 7th house for Mercury. It also fives additional conditions for the Marana effects to occur in these houses which are,"..tasminpaapayute.athavaa paapadrishte.arineechasthe durbale duKkhamaapnuyaat". So the planet will have to be in Marana Karana Sthana with a malefic or aspected by malefic or in Neecha Rasi and weak for it to give sorrow (dukkha). > > Sanjay, perhaps, relies on Sthana vishesha where planets can not give their effects and where the condition of being with malefic etc. are not ,apparently, applicable. Incidentally it is interesting that the first Maranakarana Sthana shlokas appear in adhyaaya, which deals with Kalachakra dasha(Adhyaaya 17), whereas one not requiring malefic association as a condition appears in Adhyaaya 2 related to Graha swarupa. The relevant shlokas are: > jatk pairjat > jätaka pärijäta > AXyay 2 > adhyäya 2 > kamavnInNdnraizyata> isteNÊpuÇamrvN*mana>, > kämävanénandanaräçiyätäù sitenduputrämaravandyamänäù| > AiròdaSte=ioljatke;u sda=òmSw>ziniròd> Syat.52. > ariñöadäste'khilajätakeñu sadä'ñöamasthaùçaniriñöadaù syäta||52|| > > Indicating bhavaas where planets are incapable of giving their effects. > AXyay 17 > adhyäya 17 > > æat&Swangtae jIvae darSwangt> kj>, > bhrätåsthänagato jévo därasthänagataù kujaù| > twa jNmgtae mNdae ra÷nRvm raizg>.34. > tathä janmagato mando rähurnavama räçigaù||34|| > > cNÔae=òm¢h< yat> sUyaeR ir:)g&h< gt>, > candro'ñöamagrahaà yätaù süryo riñphagåhaà gataù| > bux> sÝmÉavSwae ÉagRv> zÇuraizg>.35. > budhaù saptamabhävastho bhärgavaù çatruräçigaù||35|| > > #Tyev< mr[swan< tiSmNpapyute=wva, > ityevaà maraëasthänaà tasminpäpayute'thavä| > papòe=irnIcSwe ÊbRle Ê>omaßuyat!.36. > päpadåñöe'rinécasthe durbale duùkhamäpnuyät||36|| > > Indicating Bhavas whetre malefic association etc. are required. > I have used sanskrit99 fonts on alternate lines of the shloka. > > Chandrashekhar. > Narasimha P.V.R. Rao wrote: Namaste, > > On vedic astrology , there has been a discussion on whether Mercury's marana karaka sthana is 7th or 4th and on the significance of marana karaka sthanas. > > Sanjay ji gave 7th as Mercury's marana karaka sthana earlier, but changed it to 4th recently. I am not sure of the classical basis he has for 4th, but the reverred classic "Jataka Parijatam" I think mentions 7th for Mercury. JHora uses 7th and not 4th. > > I have explained the basis and significance of marana karaka sthana in one of my lessons (link below). I will summarize quickly. > > These are the houses where the planets are most uncomfortable/feel awkward. To do justice to the house they occupy, they have to work extra hard and, in the process, the houses they own suffer. Thus, houses/karakatwa owned by planets in marana karaka sthana suffer. > > Sun is the significator of ego. He feels awkward in the 12th house of overcoming ego. Jupiter likes peace. He feels awkward in the 3rd house of weapons and boldness. Mars is the significator of wars and fighting. He is very comfortable in the 6th house. But, if you place him in the 7th house and tell him to give somebody a relationship and marriage, he will feel awkward about it. Similarly, Venus is the giver of love, relationships and marriage. If you place him in the 6th house of war and bachelorhood, he will be most uncomfortable there. Rahu, the planet of adharma, naturally feels awkward in the 9th house of dharma, religion and temple. Saturn is the giver of disease and suffering. If you place him in the 1st house of health and tell him to take care of someone's health, he will naturally feel awkward. > > Thus, marana karaka sthanas of planets are places where they are not comfortable and where they have to work extra hard to do justice. In the process, other promises of the planet suffer. > > May Jupiter's light shine on us, > Narasimha > ------------------------------- > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > SJC website: http://www.SriJagannath.org > ------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > Links > > > vedic astrology/ > > > vedic astrology > > Terms of Service. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 1, 2005 Report Share Posted June 1, 2005 Namaskaar Sri Sanjay Rath, Thank you for your remarks.... Please excuse me from asking more and more questions, but this is how I learn. Marana Karan Sthana would mean where the planet loses its quality. If Mercury is dual, then it should lose its duality. As per Sri Sanjay's statement the 4th house in relation with Mithuna and 7th house in relation with Kanya, would not dissolve the dual nature of Mercury. Should it not be the place where Mercury loses its dual nature itself and not just the nature as per its sign? Thanks and Regards Bharat vedic astrology, "Pt. Sanjay Rath" <guruji@s...> wrote: > > > om namo bhagavate vāsudevāyaDear UtpalNeed not be.What connection does lagna have to the kama bhava matters of mithuna rasi? Infact if mithuna is the lagna then the native has early realisation of this and understands this, provided Mercury is strong. I have found most mithuna lagna people to be concerned about and serious about not having such vices. If Mithuna is in the 2nd house from UL then you will see how this thing comes out, also with mithuna in A7 or such areas. I have found that mihuna in 2nd from UL never fails to give multiple partners, especially in countries and places where the rasi is very strong like big cities. Best WishesSanjay Rath15B Gangaram Hospital Road, New Delhi 110060 IndiaPhone +91-11-25717162, http://srath.com -Utpal Pathak [vedic_pathak]Pt. Sanjay Rath[guruji@s...]Saturday, May 28, 2005 05:47 PM:Re: [vedic astrology] Re: Marana Karaka Sthana of Mercury (Shri ChandrShekhar) > Dear Sanjay Rathji, Thank you for your note and good explanation of Mercury and it's MK Stana. Unfortunately I belong to Mithuna Lagna but always saved by the lord from all the Vices attached to it. thanks again for rememberig me. respectfully yours, Utpal Pathak > > "Pt. Sanjay Rath" <guruji@s...> wrote: > > om namo bhagavate vāsudevāyaDear Utpal and Chandrasekhar jiI have consistantly held that there are two opinions about the marana sthana of Mercury - perhaps because of the peculiar dualistic nature of Mercury. Look at its houses - Gemini is the most impure indicating prostitution and what not all evils and look at Virgo the purest of the pure. Perhaps the marana sthana has to do with these two houses unlike the other planets. Perhaps the marana sthana of Mercury in the 7th house related to Virgo where the purity or *virginity* of the virgin is lost and the 4th house relates to the marana sthana for Gemini where the avidya and evil comes to an end due to home. In fact youngsters are always concerned or *controlled* by the awareness or some fear of home - parents.Regards and thanks for the probeSanjay15B Gangaram Hospital Road, New Delhi 110060 IndiaPhone 11-25717162, http://srath.com -Utpal Pathak [vedic_pathak]vedic astrology: Saturday, May 28, 2005 09:59 AM:Re: [vedic astrology] Re: Marana Karaka Sthana of Mercury (Shri ChandrShekhar) > Dear Chandrashekhar Ji, This is a very important post for me. It'll go long way to understand MK's effects in actual life. I was confused about Marankarka placement of planets and it's parctical effects on the natives as i have seen that many people have planets in MK and they have not suffered in the karkatatva or bhava results. now i got the hint to test it further with the malefic Association with the said planets. regards, utpal > > Chandrashekhar <chandrashekhar46> wrote:Dear Narasimha, > You are right. Jataka Parijata does say 7th house for Mercury. It also fives additional conditions for the Marana effects to occur in these houses which are,"..tasminpaapayute.athavaa paapadrishte.arineechasthe durbale duKkhamaapnuyaat". So the planet will have to be in Marana Karana Sthana with a malefic or aspected by malefic or in Neecha Rasi and weak for it to give sorrow (dukkha). > > Sanjay, perhaps, relies on Sthana vishesha where planets can not give their effects and where the condition of being with malefic etc. are not ,apparently, applicable. Incidentally it is interesting that the first Maranakarana Sthana shlokas appear in adhyaaya, which deals with Kalachakra dasha(Adhyaaya 17), whereas one not requiring malefic association as a condition appears in Adhyaaya 2 related to Graha swarupa. The relevant shlokas are: > jatk pairjat > jätaka pärijäta > AXyay 2 > adhyäya 2 > kamavnInNdnraizyata> isteNÊpuÇamrvN*mana>, > kämävanénandanaräçiyätäù sitenduputrämaravandyamänäù| > AiròdaSte=ioljatke;u sda=òmSw>ziniròd> Syat.52. > ariñöadäste'khilajätakeñu sadä'ñöamasthaùçaniriñöadaù syäta||52|| > > Indicating bhavaas where planets are incapable of giving their effects. > AXyay 17 > adhyäya 17 > > æat&Swangtae jIvae darSwangt> kj>, > bhrätåsthänagato jévo därasthänagataù kujaù| > twa jNmgtae mNdae ra÷nRvm raizg>.34. > tathä janmagato mando rähurnavama räçigaù||34|| > > cNÔae=òm¢h< yat> sUyaeR ir:)g&h< gt>, > candro'ñöamagrahaà yätaù süryo riñphagåhaà gataù| > bux> sÝmÉavSwae ÉagRv> zÇuraizg>.35. > budhaù saptamabhävastho bhärgavaù çatruräçigaù||35|| > > #Tyev< mr[swan< tiSmNpapyute=wva, > ityevaà maraëasthänaà tasminpäpayute'thavä| > papòe=irnIcSwe ÊbRle Ê>omaßuyat!.36. > päpadåñöe'rinécasthe durbale duùkhamäpnuyät||36|| > > Indicating Bhavas whetre malefic association etc. are required. > I have used sanskrit99 fonts on alternate lines of the shloka. > > Chandrashekhar. > Narasimha P.V.R. Rao wrote: Namaste, > > On vedic astrology , there has been a discussion on whether Mercury's marana karaka sthana is 7th or 4th and on the significance of marana karaka sthanas. > > Sanjay ji gave 7th as Mercury's marana karaka sthana earlier, but changed it to 4th recently. I am not sure of the classical basis he has for 4th, but the reverred classic "Jataka Parijatam" I think mentions 7th for Mercury. JHora uses 7th and not 4th. > > I have explained the basis and significance of marana karaka sthana in one of my lessons (link below). I will summarize quickly. > > These are the houses where the planets are most uncomfortable/feel awkward. To do justice to the house they occupy, they have to work extra hard and, in the process, the houses they own suffer. Thus, houses/karakatwa owned by planets in marana karaka sthana suffer. > > Sun is the significator of ego. He feels awkward in the 12th house of overcoming ego. Jupiter likes peace. He feels awkward in the 3rd house of weapons and boldness. Mars is the significator of wars and fighting. He is very comfortable in the 6th house. But, if you place him in the 7th house and tell him to give somebody a relationship and marriage, he will feel awkward about it. Similarly, Venus is the giver of love, relationships and marriage. If you place him in the 6th house of war and bachelorhood, he will be most uncomfortable there. Rahu, the planet of adharma, naturally feels awkward in the 9th house of dharma, religion and temple. Saturn is the giver of disease and suffering. If you place him in the 1st house of health and tell him to take care of someone's health, he will naturally feel awkward. > > Thus, marana karaka sthanas of planets are places where they are not comfortable and where they have to work extra hard to do justice. In the process, other promises of the planet suffer. > > May Jupiter's light shine on us, > Narasimha > ------------------------------- > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > SJC website: http://www.SriJagannath.org > ------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > Links > > > vedic astrology/ > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.