#3 : Marriage Puzzle Answer! (to Panditji)

[Guest guest]

Namaste friends,

 

> Your point is well made, if look at so many techniques and parameters> as you

have rightly pointed out all the grahas become capable of> giving the result.

That is the point I have been trying to make for> past so many months. If one

looks at main kundali then arudhs in it,> darakarak, UL, then do the same for

navansh for marraige, you will> find that every graha has a potentioal to give

marriage. Then one is> left with a muddy water and things are not clear so we

go on to newer> techniques to find out why the said dasha gave the result.

Even without using arudhas etc, there are multiple candidates and there are no

clear rules to pick one candidate.

 

In the husband's chart in the puzzle, you picked Saturn because Mercury was less

likely and not because Saturn was a great candidate to give marriage! You said

you picked Saturn because he was the 7th lord from Moon in rasi and Mercury had

nothing to do with 7th. If we look at the lords, occupants and aspectors of 7th

from lagna and Moon in rasi chart, several planets can come out. If we look at

their rasi, navamsa and nakshatra dispositors, even more planets become

qualified.

 

Thus, the problem of having multiple candidates and having to make a choice is

not a problem of only those who use arudhas. I have so far not seen anybody

give a consistent set of rules to predict the mahadasa and antardasa of wedding

based on clear rules, whether using arudhas or not.

 

* * *

 

My father uses simple navamsa dispositor based principles with Vimsottari dasa.

The navamsa dispositors of the rasi dispositors of various house lords are

important planets for the houses. For example, the 7th lord from my Venus is

Venus. His rasi dispositor is Mars. Navamsa dispositor of Mars is Jupiter. I

got married in Jupiter antardasa. The 7th lord from Venus in my wife's chart is

Saturn. He is in Taurus in rasi chart. Lord Venus is in Sagittarius in navamsa.

She got married in Jupiter antardasa as per Vimsottari. The dispositor of 7th

lord from Venus in my sister's rasi chart is Jupiter and he is in Cancer

navamsa. She got married in Moon antardasa as per Vimsottari.

 

Of course, these thumbrules don't always work. But, in Jeyaram's case, 7th lord

from lagna and Venus is Venus himself. His dispositor in rasi chart is Mars.

Mars is in a Saturnine sign in navamsa.

 

May Jupiter's light shine on

us,Narasimha-------------------------------Free

Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.netFree Jyotish software

(Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org

SJC website:

http://www.SriJagannath.org-------------------------------

 

vedic astrology, Panditji <navagraha@g...> wrote:>

Namaste Jeyaram,> > Your point is well made, if look at so many techniques and

parameters> as you have rightly pointed out all the grahas become capable of>

giving the result. That is the point I have been trying to make for> past so

many months. If one looks at main kundali then arudhs in it,> darakarak, UL,

then do the same for navansh for marraige, you will> find that every graha has

a potentioal to give marriage. Then one is> left with a muddy water and things

are not clear so we go on to newer> techniques to find out why the said dasha

gave the result.> > Now as all grahas qulify to give results, event if known in

advance> can be easily justified as all of them promise the result in this tens>

of parameters scenario. However if one uses a few time tested> parameters

consistently and gets most of the information from the> rashi chart alone one

does not get confused as much.> > BTW, do not assume that I have not tried the

other> parameters/techniques, I do not use them unless I have had consistent>

results on many charts. Everyone has to find that technique that works> for

them consistently in a large percent of cases.> > ...> > > On 5/26/05, Jeyaram

<jeyaram009> wrote:> > > > > > Dear Narasimha Ji,> > > > I am

interspersing my comments and observations in your reply:> > > > [Narasimha]>

> It is not true that dasas did not show the event. The problem is that> >

multiple dates out of the four dates given by you can be justified using> >

dasas. On the contrary, annual TP chart of one date really stood out.> > > >

[Jeyaram] > > That is precisely my point! So when multiple dates could be

justified using> > dasas, how can we say that the Dasa was pinpointing the

event ? Here I am> > talking about the timing of event than the nature of event

itself.> > > > The following planets qualified as significators for giving

marriage:> > > > 1.RAH (Reasons:Darakaraka, conjoined with VEN in Navamsa)> >

2. SAT (Reasons: Aspecting the 7th house in Rasi & Navamsa)> > 3. MON (Reasons:

conjoined with UL Lord JUP)> > 4. VEN (Reasons: Natural Significator, 7th Lord

in Rasi)> > 5. MER (Reasons: Conjoined VEN in UL in Saggitarius ??)> > 6. JUP

(Reasons: UL Lord)> > 7. MAR (Reasons: 7th Lord of Navamsa and aspecting UL

Lord in Rasi)> > 8. SUN (Reasons: Conjoined Navamsa 7th Lord in Navamsa)> > 9.

KET (Reasons: Natural significator of marriage)

> [snip]