#3 : Marriage Puzzle Answer! (Narasimha)

[Guest guest]

Namaste Jeyaram,

 

Your point is well made, if look at so many techniques and parameters

as you have rightly pointed out all the grahas become capable of

giving the result. That is the point I have been trying to make for

past so many months. If one looks at main kundali then arudhs in it,

darakarak, UL, then do the same for navansh for marraige, you will

find that every graha has a potentioal to give marriage. Then one is

left with a muddy water and things are not clear so we go on to newer

techniques to find out why the said dasha gave the result.

 

Now as all grahas qulify to give results, event if known in advance

can be easily justified as all of them promise the result in this tens

of parameters scenario. However if one uses a few time tested

parameters consistently and gets most of the information from the

rashi chart alone one does not get confused as much.

 

BTW, do not assume that I have not tried the other

parameters/techniques, I do not use them unless I have had consistent

results on many charts. Everyone has to find that technique that works

for them consistently in a large percent of cases.

 

....

 

 

On 5/26/05, Jeyaram <jeyaram009 wrote:

>

>

> Dear Narasimha Ji,

>

> I am interspersing my comments and observations in your reply:

>

> [Narasimha]

> It is not true that dasas did not show the event. The problem is that

> multiple dates out of the four dates given by you can be justified using

> dasas. On the contrary, annual TP chart of one date really stood out.

>

> [Jeyaram]

> That is precisely my point! So when multiple dates could be justified using

> dasas, how can we say that the Dasa was pinpointing the event ? Here I am

> talking about the timing of event than the nature of event itself.

>

> The following planets qualified as significators for giving marriage:

>

> 1.RAH (Reasons:Darakaraka, conjoined with VEN in Navamsa)

> 2. SAT (Reasons: Aspecting the 7th house in Rasi & Navamsa)

> 3. MON (Reasons: conjoined with UL Lord JUP)

> 4. VEN (Reasons: Natural Significator, 7th Lord in Rasi)

> 5. MER (Reasons: Conjoined VEN in UL in Saggitarius ??)

> 6. JUP (Reasons: UL Lord)

> 7. MAR (Reasons: 7th Lord of Navamsa and aspecting UL Lord in Rasi)

> 8. SUN (Reasons: Conjoined Navamsa 7th Lord in Navamsa)

> 9. KET (Reasons: Natural significator of marriage)

>

> [Narasimha]

> As far as my understanding of dasas goes, there is no magical and

> consistently replicable formula to say that marriage is given in the

> mahadasa of X and antardasa of Y. There are multiple planets that become

> candidates to give an event and it is not easy to pick one planet

> confidently at the mahadasa, antardasa and pratyantardasa levels. Of course,

> it could just be a limitation of my knowledge.

>

> [Jeyaram]

> All we need to do is to arrange the planetary significators for each event

> in the descending order of their strength. Eagerly waiting for the day when

> such formula is found/revealed.

>

> [Narasimha]But I am much more comfortable relying on annual TP charts to

> make precise predictions.

>

> [Jeyaram]

> Just a loud thinking on my part: Has anybody to your knowledge has cast

> Annual TPC from birth to say 40 years for any accurate chart(s) and found a

> pattern of HORA LORD, WEEK DAY LORD or the combination of the same. It could

> in fact be the key to precision in timing of events. Then probably proper

> Event-signification-weightage factor for each planet be assigned.

>

> [Narasimha]

> Ideal application of dasas requires combining three factors - (1) natal

> chart, (2) dasa pravesha chart and (3) transit chart. Dasas, antardasas etc

> should be judged using these three factors. However, (2) is often ignored

> due to accuracy considerations and often we ignore (3) too (for no reason).

> Relying on natal chart alone to judge dasas is quite fallible. There may be

> 3 or 4 planets that can give marriage as per natal chart. Why does only one

> planet give marriage in its antardasa?

>

> [Jeyaram]

> You are asking a million dollar question to a penny-less in astrology.

>

> [Narasimha]For example, I micro-rectified my own chart thoroughly and

> explained tens of events upto deha-antardasa level (6th level!) of

> Vimsottari dasa, using a very consistent methodology. What I found in that

> exercise is that dasa pravesha chakra is very important. If your dasa

> calculations are extremely accurate (which requires a superfine

> rectification, invariably involving many rounds of trial and error), dasa

> pravesha chakra will work nicely.

>

> [Jeyaram]

> That proves the existence of consistent techniques for precise analysis.

> Probably we have set our focus to Birthtime rectification (both at macro

> level and micro level) on top priority. Then may be every principle set

> forth by the Sages will automatically start working at all levels.

>

> [Narasimha]

> A lot of Jyotish we do these days is an art rather than a science.

>

>

> [Jeyaram]

> Every cook is given the same masala (ingredients) as inputs but their

> cooking is different. Here masala/ingredients is the scientific part and

> cooking is the art.

>

> [Narasimha]

> But there are scientific, systematic and replicable aspects of Jyotish. When

> the time comes, they will come out in the open.

>

> [Jeyaram]

> Waiting for the day that happens. Could any good Jyotisha reading this

> message predict when it's likely to happen ?

>

> [Narasimha]

> > Blessed are those who are able to get

> > answers from you and Sanjay ji during their formative stages in

> > Astrology learning!

>

> I am flattered, but honestly I just share my 2 cents based on my limited

> reading, limited experience and limited thinking. If any students think that

> I know a lot and that they are "blessed" to get clarifications from me, they

> have wrong expectations. Sanjay ji is on a different intellectual plane

> altogether.

>

> [Jeyaram]

> Narasimha ji, it was an honest compliment from my side. If you claim your

> knowledge is 2 cents, it may be true compared to Parashara; it may also be

> true if it is 20 cents compared to Sanjay ji. However compared to us it is

> definitely 200 cents. Writing such a comprehensive software as JHora is akin

> to Ganesha physically writing Mahabharata on the condition that he

> understands every word he writes. So whether you get clarifications on

> Mahabharata from Ganesha or Veda Vyas, do you consider that a blessing or

> not ?

>

> May God bless you & Sanjay ji with maximum longevity of Kaliyug.

>

> Respectful Regards

> Jeyaram

>

> India Matrimony: Find your life partner online.

>

>

>

> Group info:

> vedic astrology/info.html

>

> To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to

> vedic astrology-

>

> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

>

>

>

>

> ________________________________

> Links

>

>

> vedic astrology/

>

>

> vedic astrology

>

>

> ________________________________

> Links

>

>

> vedic astrology/

>

>

> vedic astrology

>

>

>

>