Guest guest Posted May 20, 2005 Report Share Posted May 20, 2005 Namaste, Yes this would be an interesting discussion. I am sure many on the list are tired of these questions as many have taken one position or the other and all vijaydas is asking is to have a look at the classics and clarify the points. For all we know classics may be ambiguous and are open to extrapolation or speculation the way they are written and transmitted. That may not have be enthe intent of the author though, we will never know. Technically vijaydas' proposition makes sense to me. They are amshas and not signs and as rishis left us with no example charts and illustrations this is a field ripe for theorizing. .... On 5/20/05, vedicastrostudent <vedicastrostudent wrote: > Dear Vijayadas, > I am eager to see the reply to your question as well. Nevertheless, > there is an assumption in your question, and I would like you to > clarify that. I am still unclear about your exact - classics > supported - definition or definitions of Rasi. I know you have said > that Rasi has multiple different meanings based on context. Keeping > that in mind, what definition do you ascribe to the "Rasi" of "Rasi > Dristi" and why? Does Rasi mean "zodiacal sign" in this context? > Havent the sages have said that Aries has Rasi Dristi on Leo? What > is your interpretation of their intent in this context? _IF_ they > simply mean Aries zodiacal sign has Rasi Dristi on Leo zodiacal > sign, then it follows that if an amsha is associated with a zodiacal > sign, then since the zodiacal sign aspects other zodiacal signs due > to their very nature, then Aries amsha SHOULD have Rasi dristi on > Leo Amsha, even if you dont support amshas being associated with > houses. However, _IF_ they mean Aries-in-Rasi-chart has Rasi Dristi > on Leo-in-Rasi-chart, then of course your question to Sanjay Rathji > is still valid, but you would then need to specify clearly where in > the classics this unambiguous interpretation has been given - that > when the sages referred to Rasi dristi, they mean Rasi-chart-dristi. > Is there such an unambiguous shloka anywhere - I know no Sanskrit at > all - so this question is a genuine question, not a challenge. > > Hope this turns out to be an illuminating exchange for everyone. > > Sundeep > > vedic astrology, "vijayadas_pradeep" > <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote: > > Dear Sanjay Rath ji > > > > Pls find this sincere query and have kindness to clear this doubt. > > > > If a planet say Jupiter is within 3deg 20 mins within Aries > > Rashi,then it is in Aries Amsha too.Now if a planet say Mars is > > within the 8th navamsha in Taurus Rashi,then it is in leo > amsha.Now > > if i arrange this as a chart, are Jupiter and Mars in trines.Sage > > has given rules for aspect.As per special or full aspects,can > > Jupiter aspect Mars in this case.When we say moon is in the > navamsha > > of mercury, and aspected by Shukra - what does it mean. > > How is house possible by arranging vargamshas.SJC site has an > > article which considers Graha drishti in Vargas as disputable > > matter.Do you think it as disputable.Kindly explain why it is > > disputable. > > > > Please have kindness in explaining these, as it will save a lot of > > time and space.I have read old horoscopes and books in local > > language but have found vargamshas as amshas and not as > > houses.Neither sage has said so.But you have proposed houses in > > vargamshas - Kindly explain why it is done and how it is possible. > > > > Thanks > > Pradeep > > > > > > > Group info: > vedic astrology/info.html > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to > vedic astrology- > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > ________________________________ > Links > > > vedic astrology/ > > > vedic astrology > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.