Fw: Saturn-Venus or Moon-Jupiter?

[Guest guest]

-

Namaste friends,

 

Tony Blair has the 7th lord Mars in lagna. As per Parasara, Dwi-saptati sama

dasa applies. I personally prefer that dasa to Vimsottari dasa in his case.

Here is my explanation of events based on DSS dasa.

 

In his rasi chart, exalted 4th lord Sun is with 5th lord Mercury and gives

Mercury's results. Thus, Sun dasa made him Prime Minister. In D-10, Sun is the

5th lord of power, occupies GL and aspects lagna (by rasi drishti). According

to Parasara (see the chapter on raja yogas in BPHS), a planet associating with

lagna and GL by way of occupation, ownership or aspect, becomes a Yogada and

brings power. Sun is in GL and aspects lagna. He brings power. The antardasa of

ascension to Prime Ministership was Jupiter's. While Sun is the 5th lord from

lagna, Jupiter is in 5th lord in 5th from Sun (all in D-10, chart of career)!

 

Moon dasa started in October 2001, soon after the WTC attacks. Moon is the 3rd

lord of aggression in rasi chart and afflicted by Rahu in the 9th house of

dharma.

 

Moon is in Maheshwara shashtyamsa. Maheshwara is Shiva as the destroyer and

leader of the eleven Rudras. His shashtyamsa shows destruction. That was the

karma carried by Moon and it had to happen.

 

It was Moon-Mars antardasa during Nov 2002-Jan 2004 that saw him commit the Iraq

mistake. In D-10, Mars is in Aries lagna and shows bold actions. He also

occupies A3 (arudha pada of 3rd house, i.e. manifestation of boldness). Mars

made him take the country to a hasty war. Then Mercury antardasa ran until

recently. Mercury is the 3rd and 6th lord in D-10 and is a rank malefic. He

shows the rise of enemies and problems from people with strong Mercury (and

also media, shown by Mercury).

 

Jupiter antardasa in Moon dasa started in Feb 2005. Moon and Jupiter are

together in the 12th house in D-10. They occupy A9 and A10. If bhagya pada and

rajya pada are together, it is a raja yoga. Moon and Jupiter occupy them in

Pisces. So Moon-Jupiter makes him continue as the leader. From Moon, Jupiter is

lagna lord in lagna. I see an auspicious new beginning for him and I see him

being less aggressive and more mature and wise from now.

 

Based on his annual Tithi Pravesha chart, I see big trouble for him during

June-August (especially mid-July). In D-10 of the annual chart, 8th lord Venus

and 10th lord Jupiter have an exchange. So Venus dasa during June-Aug 2005 and

Jupiter dasa during Feb-April 2006 are problematic. But, I don't see a complete

fall. There will be brewing discontent within his party, which he will manage to

overcome.

 

The transit of Rahu in Pisces (containing dasa lord antardasa lord Moon and

Jupiter in D-10) will continue to be problematic in career. But, the period

when Saturn and Ketu transit in Leo and Jupiter transits in Scorpio will be a

glorious period in his career. From his natal rasi Moon, Leo is the 8th. But,

from his natal dasamsa Moon, Leo is 6th and Scorpio is 9th!! During this

transit, he will be under much duress physically and on the edge always. But he

will display conviction, statesmanship and wisdom in his actions and his

balancing act in a tumultous world will receive praise from historians.

 

In my judgment, next year will be rough and Blair himself will wonder whether to

withdraw (dasa and antardasa lords Moon and Jupiter are in the 12th house of

compromise, losss and renunciation in D-10!). But I tend to think that Blair

will hang in there because there is history to be made in 2007-2008.

 

May Jupiter's light shine on

us,Narasimha-------------------------------Free

Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.netFree Jyotish software

(Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org

SJC website:

http://www.SriJagannath.org-------------------------------

 

> Dear Rao sahab,> > I still feel that the venus antar dasa should see him fall,

and that > was the basis of my prediction in march. I beleive in my reply in >

end of march (message 6716) I also questioned if he even wanted the > position

anymore, that he may want out now. Enigmatic Sa/Ve makes it > difficult to

read. > > Tough to predict a win/lose, but clear that the loss of position has

> to come in this period for him. The question then becomes - when and > how?

> > So I would favour the argument that you have posted that Blair has > won

only to lose. Enigmatic indeed.> > Regards,> -Puneet> > --- In

, knrao <kn_rao> wrote:> > Saturn-Venus of

Blair> > I will analyse further the horoscope of Blair. But in the> >

meantime, one can refer to what I had said about the> > Saturn-Venus periods

etc in my researches. Has Blair won> > only to lose ? I am posing this

question.> > > > Yours sincerely,> > K.N.Rao.