Houses in Divisional Charts to Pradeep (Miscellaneous Replies for April 23, 2005)

[Guest guest]

-Dear Sir,

I have been following the messages on this site with a great deal of

interest and am glad that someone has taken up the topic of twin

horoscopes. It is not easy to predict in twin horoscopes especially

if the birth time difference is negligible.

I have here the details of a set of twins with t.o.b difference of

just one minute:

d.o.b 17 Nov 2004

t.o.b 18-40 and 18-41 respectively

p.o.b Bangalore, India

the birth was by c-section and that explains the negligible

difference in birth time.

In this set of charts I have not been able to find any differences

in the divisional charts also.

Looks wise they are very different and even display differences in

nature.

Could there be any different methods of judging twin horoscopes?

 

Regards,

ennaye

-- In vedic astrology, "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao"

<pvr@c...> wrote:

> Namaste,

>

> Regarding twins, you are agreeing that the divisions of lagna are

important but you are refusing to take houses from divisional lagna.

I fail to see how you can explain the differences between twins.

>

> Let us try an example of twins.

>

> (1) 15th September 1970, 1:14 am (TZ: 5:00 west)

> Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA (97 W 03' 29", 36 N 06' 56")

> Moon: 25Aq38, Lagna: 17Ge37

>

> (1) 15th September 1970, 1:29 am (TZ: 5:00 west)

> Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA (97 W 03' 29", 36 N 06' 56")

> Moon: 25Aq39, Lagna: 14Ge20

>

> Saravali gives some general guidelines on physical attributes,

facial features and general nature based on hora, drekkana and

navamsa. If you use those guidelines, you will not really see the

differences between these twins. For example, Saravali says that one

born in the 5th navamsa of Gemini has a wide face, large chest, big

head, deception, strong shoulders etc. It says that one born in the

6th navamsa of Gemini has sweet looks, talkative nature, uneven

forehead, nice body, red lips etc.

>

> Now, how do you explain the glaring difference between these two

twins using just the above?

>

> One twin is insane and the other is brilliant and has degrees in

engineering and medicine.

>

> If you take houses in divisional charts, you can explain the

differences.

>

> BTW, many (though not all) old astrologers who use navamsa take

houses in navamsa.

>

> May Jupiter's light shine on us,

> Narasimha

> -------------------------------

> Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net

> Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org

> SJC website: http://www.SriJagannath.org

> -------------------------------

>

> > > Pradeep, do you support taking houses in navamsa or

> > > not? Please make that clear.

> >

> > Dear Narasimha ji

> >

> > Thanks a lot for your reply.

> > For me navamsha is also a division.

> > Now regarding twins -you are right - lagnas navamsha/drekkana

etc is

> > very important.But no bhava is needed here as well.

> > As i have always said,divisions are for our lagna and

planets.Can you

> > think any other way of getting divisions.Lagna too has divisions

as it

> > is having a coordinate or degree.

> > Through divisions we are seeing the kshethra,drekkana,navamsha

etc of

> > our lagna.

> >

> > Let us take Saravali.

> >

> > ''Following are the effects of births in the nine

Navāńśas in Aries

> > Ascendant: Effects of Aries Ascendant, First

Navāńśa: The native will

> > have a face, resembling that of a he-goat, with nose and

shoulders not

> > being very prominent. He will have a fierce voice, ugly

appearance and

> > narrow eyes. His body will be thin, but free from defects.

Effects of

> > Aries Ascendant, Second Navāńśa: The native will

be dark in

> > complexion, will have broad shoulders and long arms. small

forehead,

> > strong collar bones, sharp sight and prominent face and nose. He

will

> > be an affable speaker and will possess weak legs''.

> >

> > Here Aries ascendant represents our Tanubhava(Rashi).First

navamsha of

> > Aries is Aries - Thus if our lagna is within 3.2 degrees ,then

effects

> > are as per first navamsha.Second navasmha in Aries is Taurus -

Thus if

> > lagna is after 3 degrees 20 mins and before 6.40 we take effects

as

> > per second navamsha within Aries Rashi.

> >

> > On the other hand bhava means - we consider

Tanu ,dhana,bhagya,labha

> > etc in navamsha.I sincerely wish if people may start taking these

> > factors for chart rectification than bhavas.

> >

> > Regds

> > Pradeep