Houses in Divisional Charts to Pradeep (Miscellaneous Replies for April 23, 2005)

[Guest guest]

Namaste,

 

Regarding twins, you are agreeing that the divisions of lagna are important but

you are refusing to take houses from divisional lagna. I fail to see how you

can explain the differences between twins.

 

Let us try an example of twins.

 

(1) 15th September 1970, 1:14 am (TZ: 5:00 west)Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA (97 W

03' 29", 36 N 06' 56")

Moon: 25Aq38, Lagna: 17Ge37

(1) 15th September 1970, 1:29 am (TZ: 5:00 west)Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA (97 W

03' 29", 36 N 06' 56")

Moon: 25Aq39, Lagna: 14Ge20

Saravali gives some general guidelines on physical attributes, facial features

and general nature based on hora, drekkana and navamsa. If you use those

guidelines, you will not really see the differences between these twins. For

example, Saravali says that one born in the 5th navamsa of Gemini has a wide

face, large chest, big head, deception, strong shoulders etc. It says that one

born in the 6th navamsa of Gemini has sweet looks, talkative nature, uneven

forehead, nice body, red lips etc.

 

Now, how do you explain the glaring difference between these two twins using just the above?

 

One twin is insane and the other is brilliant and has degrees in engineering and medicine.

 

If you take houses in divisional charts, you can explain the differences.

 

BTW, many (though not all) old astrologers who use navamsa take houses in navamsa.

 

May Jupiter's light shine on

us,Narasimha-------------------------------Free

Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.netFree Jyotish software

(Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org

SJC website:

http://www.SriJagannath.org-------------------------------

 

> > Pradeep, do you support taking houses in navamsa or

> > not? Please make that clear.

> > Dear Narasimha ji> > Thanks a lot for your reply.> For me navamsha is also a

division.> Now regarding twins -you are right - lagnas navamsha/drekkana etc is>

very important.But no bhava is needed here as well.> As i have always

said,divisions are for our lagna and planets.Can you> think any other way of

getting divisions.Lagna too has divisions as it> is having a coordinate or

degree.> Through divisions we are seeing the kshethra,drekkana,navamsha etc of>

our lagna.> > Let us take Saravali.> > ''Following are the effects of births in

the nine Navāńśas in Aries> Ascendant: Effects of Aries

Ascendant, First Navāńśa: The native will> have a face,

resembling that of a he-goat, with nose and shoulders not> being very

prominent. He will have a fierce voice, ugly appearance and> narrow eyes. His

body will be thin, but free from defects. Effects of> Aries Ascendant, Second

Navāńśa: The native will be dark in> complexion, will have broad

shoulders and long arms. small forehead,> strong collar bones, sharp sight and

prominent face and nose. He will> be an affable speaker and will possess weak

legs''. > > Here Aries ascendant represents our Tanubhava(Rashi).First navamsha

of> Aries is Aries - Thus if our lagna is within 3.2 degrees ,then effects> are

as per first navamsha.Second navasmha in Aries is Taurus - Thus if> lagna is

after 3 degrees 20 mins and before 6.40 we take effects as> per second navamsha

within Aries Rashi.> > On the other hand bhava means - we consider Tanu

,dhana,bhagya,labha> etc in navamsha.I sincerely wish if people may start

taking these> factors for chart rectification than bhavas.> > Regds> Pradeep