Nadyamsa from Parasara's shodasa vargas (shastyamsa)

[Guest guest]

Dear Narasimha,

Thank you very much for this clarification. I will experiment with

Chandra Kali Nadi in JH.

Best wishes

Graham

 

vedic astrology, "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao"

<pvr@c...> wrote:

> Namaste Graham,

>

> > But as far as I know, no version of Parasara uses

> > or mentions the D-150.

>

> That's partly true and partly inaccurate.

>

> Parasara may not have mentioned nadyamsa. But nadyamsa, as I

understand it, is rooted in shodasa varga (16 divisions) taught by

Parasara.

>

> Some people divide each sign into 150 equal parts and call them

the 150 nadyamsas.

>

> But we use a different kinds of nadyamsa. Both the varieties are

available in the free software Jagannatha Hora 7.02.

>

> In this variety (called "Chandra Kala Nadi" in the software), we

mark the boundaries of various vargas in rasis. For example, navamsa

borders are at 3 deg 20 min, 6 deg 40 min, 10 deg etc. Dasamsa

borders are at 3 deg, 6 deg, 9 deg etc. Chaturvimsamsa borders are

at 1 deg 15 min, 2 deg 30 min, 3 deg 45 min, 5 deg etc.

>

> If we mark the boundaries within each sign based on all the

sixteen divisions and count how many distinct partitions are in the

sign, we will get exactly 150 portions! Some portions are smaller

than 12 arc-min and some are bigger. But, there are exactly 150

unequal portions as a result of dividing the rasi based on shodasa

vargas.

>

> Chandra kala means phases of Moon and means 16. So we call

this "Chandra Kala Nadi", i.e. nadi from 16 [vargas].

>

> If you ask me, this is the correct nadyamsa and the one obtained

from uniform division of a sign into 150 equal parts is wrong. Thus,

nadyamsa is rooted in shodasa varga.

>

> Each nadi is basically a unique combination of shodasa varga parts.

>

> May Jupiter's light shine on us,

> Narasimha

> -------------------------------

> Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net

> Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org

> SJC website: http://www.SriJagannath.org

> -------------------------------

>

>

> > Dear Partha,

> > Thank you. I can now see that Sanjay Rath must be confusing the

> > shastyamsa with the nadiamsa: in the D-150, there are indeed

1800

> > divisions in the whole zodiac, and each the lagna does take 48"

to

> > cross a nadiamsa. But as far as I know, no version of Parasara

uses

> > or mentions the D-150.

> > Best wishes

> > Graham

> >

> > this vedic astrology, "V.Partha sarathy"

> > <partvinu@g...> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Graham

> > >

> > > Yes, there are 60 Shastiamsas per Rasi, thus there are 720.

The

> > > shastiamsa lagna changes for every two minutes approximately.

> > > best wishes

> > > partha

> > >

> > >

> > > vedic astrology, "Graham Fox"

> > > <fox.graham@w...> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Hello group members,

> > > > I have just acquired the book "Varga Chakra", which is very

> > useful

> > > > and helps me to understand the underlying principles behind

the

> > > > different methods of varga construction (Brahma varga =

> > > > straightforward harmonics as in Western astrology; Shiva

vargas

> > =

> > > > vargas with breaks or jumps, etc)

> > > > However, in Sanjay Rath's chapter on the shastyamsa (p.

134), I

> > > > don't understand why he says first (which of course I knew)

that

> > > > there the shastyamsa is one-sixtieth division of a sign

> > measuring

> > > > 30' of arc, and then goes on to say that "There are a total

of

> > 1800

> > > > shastyamsa in the zodiac with sixty in each sign. As a time

> > > measure,

> > > > the average time taken for Lagna to traverse a shastyamsa is

48

> > > > seconds. Thus the smallest measure of time used by Parasara

is

> > 48

> > > > seconds when this shastyamsa shall change."

> > > > Surely, 12 signs x 60 divisions = 720 (not 1800), and the

> > average

> > > > time taken for a change of lagna in shastyamsa is therefore

2

> > > > minutes. Am I right, or have I misunderstood something?

> > > > Thank you for any clarification

> > > > Graham Fox