Guest guest Posted March 20, 2005 Report Share Posted March 20, 2005 Respected Panditji, Your answer is extremely convincing and highlights the importance of the Rashi chart. But could you please elaborate a little more on the following points in your mail: "I do look at the divisional lagna and planets in it or the 1-7 axis of the divisional chart.But I do not go jumping to divisional and use it as a chart with houses. I can not say parashara said to use it as a separate chart." In your opinion, what are the principles,which are applied in a rashi chart, should not be applied in a divisional chart if the divisional chart cannot be regarded as a separate chart ? Can one go to the extent of using arudha padas in divisional charts or should it be limited to just an analysis of the lagna and the planets as you have mentioned in your mail ? In otherwords, where does one draw a dividing line between those principles that can be applied in a divisional chart and those that cannot ?? Regards, Vijayanand. ------------------- Message: 2 Fri, 18 Mar 2005 22:04:24 -0500 Panditji <navagraha Re: Fw: Shodasamsa Narayana dasa (Re: Accident schematic) Namaste Kartik, Excellent question. Everything is derived from rashi and it trumps all the charts. I do look at the divisional lagna and planets in it or the 1-7 axis of the divisional chart.But I do not go jumping to divisional and use it as a chart with houses. I can not say parashara said to use it as a separate chart. ( I do not want to get into pedantic argument about it, I have not seen evidence that parashar said to use divisional as a separate chart) Also the divisional influence is a Tertiary influence and NOT the primary one. So divisional 1-7 axis is to be used to look for tertiary facors. If the primary factors are adverse, I don't care how strong a divisional chart is it is not going to give great results.Yes if a graha is debilited in rashi but exalted in navansh then his strength is improved and it is one of the strengths ( not THE strength). ______________________ India Matrimony: Find your life partner online Go to: http://.shaadi.com/india-matrimony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2005 Report Share Posted March 20, 2005 Namaste Vijayanand, The divisional chart is used to look at the amsha bala.Simply put, one looks at appropriate divisional chart and the planets in the lagna can influence the matters of that house. Sometimes one can look at 1-7 axis of the chart. I rarely go to even the 7 as I do not beleive there is something called 7th house in a divisional chart. I have seen it sparingly used for navansha though. As I mentioned ,it is a tertiary factor. Lets look at Navansh chart, lagna lord of navansh kundali, planet in navansh lagna can have a say in the matters indicated by navansh..i.e. marraige/relationship. Now what do I mean by tertiary factor ? Lets say primary factors, that come from the rashi chart are favorable, secondary factors , that also come from main rashi chart, are also favourable ( lets not get into what those factors are right now as then it will make this a long discussion). Then as both primary and secondary factors are favourably displosed, the first qualifying dasha will precipitate the event. In this case marraige/relationship. Now when is the first qualifying dasha ? For marraige it depends on the desh, kaal and stithi. 100 years ago a girl of 17 , unmarried, in india could have been a case of delayed marraige. In this day and time may be 28 is delayed marraige for a woman. For man the rules of desh kaal and stithi are different.Thats why it is important to know whether the native is a male or female and their desh , kaal, stithi. Now lets say at the age of 22 in the current desh kaal the woman is going to run a dasha of lagna lord of navansh chart or a planet in navansh langa or of a dispositor of 7th lord in main rashi ( These are tertiary factors) As primary factors do not oppose it ,the first qulaifying dasha will give marraige/relationship. What if the primary and secondary factors are not favourable and she runs a dasha of the said navansh lord. The opportunity may come but there will not be fructification, desire may sprout but opportunity may never come...or if things are really bad in main rashi chart, then it may even lead to incomplete or even malefic fructification. I hope this clears some of the questions you had. Again things are derived from rashi chart and that is the souce of it all. .... On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:30:39 +0000 (GMT), Vijayanand K <vijayanand1981 wrote: > Respected Panditji, > > Your answer is extremely convincing and highlights the > importance of the Rashi chart. > > But could you please elaborate a little more on the > following points in your mail: > > "I do look at the divisional lagna and planets in it > or the 1-7 axis of the divisional chart.But I do not > go jumping to divisional and use it as a chart with > houses. I can not say parashara said to use > it as a separate chart." > > In your opinion, what are the principles,which are > applied in a rashi chart, should not be applied in a > divisional chart if the divisional chart cannot be > regarded as a separate chart ? > > Can one go to the extent of using arudha padas in > divisional charts or should it be limited to just an > analysis of the lagna and the planets as you have > mentioned in your mail ? > > In otherwords, where does one draw a dividing line > between those principles that can be applied in a > divisional chart and those that cannot ?? > > Regards, > Vijayanand. > ------------------- > > Message: 2 > Fri, 18 Mar 2005 22:04:24 -0500 > Panditji <navagraha > Re: Fw: Shodasamsa Narayana dasa (Re: > Accident schematic) > > Namaste Kartik, > > Excellent question. Everything is derived from rashi > and it trumps all > the charts. I do look at the divisional lagna and > planets in it or the > 1-7 axis of the divisional chart.But I do not go > jumping to divisional > and use it as a chart with houses. I can not say > parashara said to use > it as a separate chart. ( I do not want to get into > pedantic argument > about it, I have not seen evidence that parashar said > to use > divisional as a separate chart) Also the divisional > influence is a > Tertiary influence and NOT the primary one. So > divisional 1-7 axis is > to be used to look for tertiary facors. If the primary > factors are > adverse, I don't care how strong a divisional chart is > it is not going > to give great results.Yes if a graha is debilited in > rashi but exalted > in navansh then his strength is improved and it is one > of the > strengths ( not THE strength). > > > ______________________ > India Matrimony: Find your life partner online > Go to: http://.shaadi.com/india-matrimony > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > Sponsor > > > ________________________________ > Links > > > vedic astrology/ > > > vedic astrology > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.