Praveenji < Fw: Shodasamsa Narayanadasa(Re:Accidentschematic)

[Guest guest]

Yes, fame in education is very clear. It was Sat-Moon. Sat is 5th lord

(education) and Moon is 10th lord (fame). In my unconscious mind, I was

pre-occupied with the idea of 'problem', hence thought of problem in education.

It shows that we should keep our senses alert, pay proper attention to all

aspects and do not do much astrology. I can afford only 3-4 minutes to a chart,

usually. Your horoscope seems to be correct.

 

Praveen Kumar (Mumbai)

-

amoebabhu

vedic astrology

19, 03, 2005 6:11 PM

[vedic astrology] Praveenji < Fw: Shodasamsa Narayanadasa(Re:Accidentschematic)

Dear Praveenji, The period was a very positive one indicating a lot

of fame and respect due to success in a number of things related to education,

career and opportunities. Also praveenji after you have a chance to analyze

this chart I had a question on another chart I was looking at in which the AK

and AmK change was indicated I am not certain as to how to interpret or time

this and I was wondering if you could give your thoughts on that (I will send

you the chart later if you are ok with that)Regards,Kartik--- In

vedic astrology, Praveen Kumar <chunnu2001@v...> wrote:> Dear

Kartik,> Your input was most useful. But, first let me know about the

phenomenon that took place during 07/30/2001-2003 as asked by you originally.>

> Praveen Kumar (Mumbai) > - > amoebabhu

> vedic astrology > 19, 03, 2005 4:00 PM>

[vedic astrology] Praveenji < Fw: Shodasamsa Narayana dasa(Re:Accident

schematic)> > > > Dear Praveenji,> I have tried to answer your

questions in detail as follows > (please tell me as to how you come to your

conclusions as I am > strongly interested in understanding predictive

astrology) :> The native is male.> 1.) TOB : 18:12 (hospital records), DOB

: 04/30/1981> 2.) Margin of error : +/- 6 minutes> 3.) Nature : Fair

minded, balanced, lazy, changing interests> Physical features : 6ft,

athletic build.> 4.) Education : Engineering (07/1998-05/2002)>

Masters (2002/08- present) with fellowship (changed > to science instead

of engineering)> Moved to the US in the 1st week of 08/02.>

5.) Parents Profession : Father (High position Engineer/Manager in >

Defense), Mother (Housewife & does social service, highly respected).> 6.)

Parents Health : Father is diabetic (some health problems for > about a year

since Jan 2004)> Please let me know if more details are required.>

Regards,> Kartik> > > vedic astrology, Praveen Kumar

> <chunnu2001@v...> wrote:> > Please give following details:> > 1) Source

of TOB, that is recorded meticulously, hospital record, > rectified etc.> >

2) Margin of error possible.> > 3) Some past trends / facts / events, may be

other than you want > to ask about. You may write about your nature,

education, > profession, marriage / spouse if married / relationship, good /

bad > periods of past, parents' profession / status, health etc.> > > > I

expect at least the sex of the native. However, with given data, > 5th house

is activated. Hence, it may not be good for children / > studies etc. Now,

the native being just 20 then, we conclude that > the period was not good for

studies. This is mainly from Rasi chart. > If the native is a female, the

other possibility is involvement in a > typical love affair wherein issues

related with pregnancy are also > involved. This is my impression,

prima-facie.> > > > Praveen Kumar (Mumbai) > > > > ----- Original

Message ----- > > amoebabhu > > To:

vedic astrology > > 19, 03, 2005 8:59 AM> >

[vedic astrology] Fw: Shodasamsa Narayana dasa (Re: > Accident

schematic)> > > > > > > > Dear Panditji,> > That was a

lot of food for thought, I havent considered > it > > that way and does

open an interesting line of thinking (in my > mind > > at least). For

further clarification Panditji I would like your > > opinion on an example

in which the divisional charts and the > natal > > chart showed

conflicting results (in my humble opinion) in two > time > > periods and

I wanted to know as to what your opinion would be > > (essentially as to

how you would interpret this). The example > is :> > DOB : 04/30/1981 >

> Time : 18:12 +/- 6 mins (100%) (I have fixed a time of birth > but > >

then I am not sure about this, if required I will e-mail you the > >

details of some incidents to fix the time of birth)> > Place : Hyderabad,

India> > The times I am talking about are 07/30/2001-2003.> > and also

the native is expecting some results (good/bad) in the > next > > couple

of months and according to me the divisional charts > showed > >

different results from the natal chart ( I might be completely > > wrong).>

> Please do not consider this as a test, this purely for my > >

understanding and I would appreciate it if you would show me as > to > >

how you would decipher this.> > Regards,> > Kartik> > > > > >

vedic astrology, Panditji > <navagraha@g...> > >

wrote:> > > namaste,> > > > > > Someone just sent me this. I am

posting it here. The gentleman > who> > > posted this is

vijaydas_pradeep. I have not asked his > permission to> > > post it here

but I thought this is in context with various > > divisional> > > and

other techniques we are debating. My apologies to Mr. > pradeep > > if I>

> > am taking too many liberties here.> > > > > > ---> > > This

mail only address my concerns regarding technical points. > > > I think we

are missing the essence. Techniques that ease our > > > calculation are a

boon. No one disagrees. For that reason we > use > > > software. But

Jyotish is not about technical sophistication. > > > > > > When we have

a door and steps to enter a house why should we > use > > our> > >

acrobatic skills and climb through the sewage pipe, at the > building> >

> rear? After knowing the basics (purpose of door and steps) one > can > >

> try climbing through sewage for a change.> > > > > > But what is

happening. One is not aware of the basics and goes > > > directly to sewage

pipe. Many go directly to dashamsha > whenever > > > professional matters

are to be ascertained, even without > knowing > > how > > > dashamsha

is derived. Many believe dashamsha as a division of > the > > > 10th house

& Navamsha as a division of the 9th house. I got > > private > > >

mails. This is certainly a bad trend.> > > > > > It is true that dash

''amsha'' is for professional matters, > but > > > there is no classical

reference sanctioning the usage of it as > a > > > chart. Moreover

astronomically it is impossible. As per Shri > > > Narasimha sage has not

even given the amsha tattwas - just the > > lords > > > alone!!! - How

can we find AL, 9TH from it,Artha trikonas etc > in > > > divisionals,

when considering it as a chart itself is against > > > rules?. > > > >

> > If we start stretching our legs before we sit, we will fall.> > >

Unfortunately some techniques are taking one away from basics. > If > >

we > > > have a good foundation, any number of floors can be erected on >

> top. > > > If our basement is weak, irrespective of how many techniques

> we > > > have, the structures can only collapse. One can keep and open

> mind > > > and pick the good from all sources. It is not necessary to >

accept > > > all from one place and leave the rest. I can learn from you >

and > > vice > > > versa may be one of the best approaches. Please see

this in > the > > > right spirit. I respect knowledge from all,but do not

accept > > > anything blindly.> > > > > > Thanks> > > Pradeep>

> > -----> > > > > > > > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 22:04:24 -0500,

Panditji <navagraha@g...> > > wrote:> > > > Namaste Kartik,> > > >

> > > > Excellent question. Everything is derived from rashi and it > >

trumps all> > > > the charts. I do look at the divisional lagna and planets

in > it > > or the> > > > 1-7 axis of the divisional chart.But I do

not go jumping to > > divisional> > > > and use it as a chart with

houses. I can not say parashara > said > > to use> > > > it as a

separate chart. ( I do not want to get into pedantic > > argument> > >

> about it, I have not seen evidence that parashar said to use> > > >

divisional as a separate chart) Also the divisional > influence is > > a>

> > > Tertiary influence and NOT the primary one. So divisional 1-> 7 >

> axis is> > > > to be used to look for tertiary facors. If the primary >

factors > > are> > > > adverse, I don't care how strong a divisional

chart is it is > not > > going> > > > to give great results.Yes if a

graha is debilited in rashi > but > > exalted> > > > in navansh then

his strength is improved and it is one of the> > > > strengths ( not THE

strength).> > > > > > > > Now about twins, every one talks about it in

connection with> > > > divisionals. As for me I treat twins as an exception

and do > not > > go> > > > formulating rules for exceptions, thats a

dangerous habit. I > am > > happy> > > > if I can make good

predictions in 75 percent of the cases. > Also > > I have> > > > seen

that navansha lagna if it changes can make facial > features> > > >

different in twins. Anyway people say there are 100s or > 1000s of> > > >

people born on the same day and time and place. This is a > > conjecture,>

> > > go and find hospital records and show me statistical record > of > >

how> > > > many births tooks place at the same place and same time.> >

> > > > > > Talking about Parashar. He has given avataars ..he says Moon >

is> > > > Krishna, Sun is Ram..and Budh is Budhha. So is this the >

parashar > > who> > > > was son of vyas ? He did not say future avataar

of budhh, so > that> > > > shloka could mean that this was written at a

much later date > or > > it was> > > > added to the original text at

a later date.He never mentions > > about> > > > kalaki avataar. There

is a classic , I forget the name,( > Hart > > Defaw> > > > mentionsi

t).It is written in this classic "When budh is in > > quadrant> > > >

from Sun.." Now we know thats anastronomical immpossibility.> > > > > >

> > Anyway the point is one has to be careful in deciphering > what > >

was said> > > > in ancient texts. There are controversies in many areas of

> > jyotish and> > > > in interpretation of classics. My point is to

use methods > that > > have> > > > been tested on many many

horoscopes. I will be really > surprised > > that> > > > people have

calculated so many divisional charts in the > past. > > May be> > > >

for well to do who could pay money to have these elaborate > > charts made>

> > > precomputer era. For most the charts were done Lagna rashi, > Moon>

> > > rashi, and navansh( Even this was added only if a client > >

insisted). In> > > > the north or may be south it was customary. it is not

so in > the> > > > western part of India.> > > > > > > > Anyway>

> > > > > > > ...> > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 19 Mar 2005

02:22:59 -0000, amoebabhu > <amoebabhu> > > wrote:> > > > >> >

> > > Dear Panditji,> > > > > I have a question (and I do not

believe in > > personalized> > > > > arguements so nothing in what I

will say will have any > personal> > > > > connotations). If we were to

focus on rashi charts and not > > give much> > > > > of consideration

to divisionals, then would it not be true > > that a> > > > > large

number of people (a relative terminology) would end > up > > with> >

> > > the same horoscope and one might be a king and the other a > > pauper

(> > > > > a theoretical comparison).Also what about twins?> > > > >

Regards,> > > > > Kartik> > > > >> > > > > --- In

vedic astrology, Panditji > > <navagraha@g...>> > > >

>> > > > > wrote:> > > > > > Namaste Narayan,> > > > > >> > > >

> > Looks like you are taking sides to defend something that > has > >

not> > > > > been> > > > > > attacked. I know what parashara said in

BPHS. He > mentioned > > about> > > > > > divisions and if you say it

was in vogue since the day > of > > parashar> > > > > you> > > > >

> must be really looooong in tooth. You are talking as if > you > > just>

> > > > had a> > > > > > conversation with him. I stand by my statement

that > > divisional> > > > > came in> > > > > > vogue after the

advent of computers and now even a > novice > > with one> > > > >

day> > > > > > of training or less can put them up and can write off >

pages > > about> > > > > > which planet is where in which varga and

from what rashi > > dasha he> > > > > is> > > > > > in what house.

Whether there are houses in divisional > charts > > is a> > > > > >

debate in itself. I do not know sanjay rath and my > intention > > was>

> > > > not> > > > > > to question his teachings or his grand fathers', as

I do > not > > know> > > > > his> > > > > > teachings. What I

commented is based on what I have seen > a > > few on> > > > > the>

> > > > > list who say they are beginners just go on and on about > >

divisionals> > > > > > and dashas in divisionals as if there was no

tomorrow. I > put > > out my> > > > > > opinion for others to read,

they can make their own > > judgements> > > > > about> > > > > >

whatever technique they want to use. If you want to use > 5 > > kinds of>

> > > > > dashas and 5 kinds of lagnas to arrive at a correct > >

prediction, all> > > > > > the power to you. I am presenting what I feel is

a > approach > > that> > > > > has> > > > > > worked for me. Let

others be judge of those methods. I > am not> > > > > forcing> > > >

> > any technique down anyone's throat. I do have an opinion > and > >

an> > > > > > methodology( Which is not invented by me, but has been > >

taught by> > > > > great> > > > > > astrologers like KN RAo, Nandan

Chirmulay, BV > Raman..etc.), > > why> > > > > should> > > > > >

you or anyone feel threatened by it.> > > > > >> > > > > > People ask

questions on this list and if I have time and> > > > > inclination I> >

> > > > answer to the best of my ability. While doing so, I feel > I > >

have to> > > > > put> > > > > > my opinions out there for people on the

list to read. I > have > > not> > > > > > criticized any astrologer on

the list, thats not my > style. > > But if I> > > > > > have

differences of opinion with a methodology I voice > my > > opinion.> >

> > > Let> > > > > > the members of the list decide what they want to use.

> Your > > methods> > > > > may> > > > > > be good for you, why

are you threatened if someone puts > out > > there> > > > > > views

on the subject.> > > > > >> > > > > > Regards> > > > > >> > > >

> > ...> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > On Sat, 19 Mar 2005

01:15:35 -0000, naaraayana_iyer> > > > > > <narayan.iyer@g...> wrote:> >

> > > > >> > > > > > > Namaste Panditji,> > > > > > >> > > > > > >

> Panditji <navagraha@g...> wrote:> > > > > > > > Namaste,> > > > > > >

>> > > > > > > > These principles are a work in progress. It would > >

surprise me> > > > > if> > > > > > > > they have been tested on tons

of charts.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > As with any field of knowledge,

there are always > > principles,> > > > > idioms,> > > > > > >

patterns, which will be formed and would be subjected > to> > > > >

testing! On> > > > > > > what basis did you jump to conclusion that these >

> principles have> > > > > not> > > > > > > been tested adequately??

It could be entirely probable > that> > > > > these> > > > > > >

principles are a "work in progress", for that matter no> > > > >

principles> > > > > > > work 100% and research is required! It could also

be > > entirely> > > > > > > probable that the chart could need some

rectification. > One> > > > > should> > > > > > > have an open mind.

For that matter, even your > principles > > are> > > > > > >

subjected to testing and cannot be relied upon! If > thats > > the> >

> > > matter,> > > > > > > then you would be an "Expert/Rishi"> > > > >

> >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > To begin with the divisionals came> >

> > > > > > into vogue after the advent of computer programs > which > >

made> > > > > > > > calculation of them fast. In the precomputer days,by >

the > > time> > > > > one> > > > > > > > calculated all these

accurately and verified, the > jatak > > would> > > > > have> > >

> > > > > been long gone. So this phenomenon is from the past > few > >

years> > > > > and I> > > > > > > > don't see evidence of its unversal

applicability or > even> > > > > > > > applicability> > > > > > > >

in 75 percent of the cases. I am sure there will be > one > > or two> >

> > > > > charts> > > > > > > > where it will fit perfectly. But as they

say here in > the > > great> > > > > cold> > > > > > > > north,

"One Robin does not make a spring".> > > > > > >> > > > > > > For your

esteemed information, Divisionals were in > vogue > > since> > > > >

the> > > > > > > days of Parasara, infact, right at the start, he >

defined > > and> > > > > gave> > > > > > > meaninings to all

divisionals upto D-60 or Shastiamsa! > Are > > you> > > > > > >

saying that Maharishis defined it and talked about it > so > > that we>

> > > > can> > > > > > > pass our idle time or do you think they had

nothing > better > > to> > > > > do???> > > > > > >> > > > >

> > Even in the past, AStrologers have gone into the > depths of> > > > >

> > calculation, for example Pt Jagannath Rath, > grandfather of > > Pt>

> > > > Sanjay> > > > > > > Rath, used to MANUALLY calculate all

divisions, > and ... you> > > > > would be> > > > > > > surprised,

dasas upto deha level, which is the 6 > levels > > deep!> > > > > > >

Ofcourse, these calculations consume a lot of time, > and > > hence,> >

> > > they> > > > > > > would limit themselves to a couple of charts. Most

of > the > > times,> > > > > > > these charts are prepared in

advance.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Ofcourse, there are Astrologers who

would restrict > > themselves to> > > > > > > Rasi & Navamsa and make

accurate predictions, and they > do > > rely a> > > > > lot> > >

> > > > on their intuition. If we restrict ourselves to Rasi & > >

Navamsa,> > > > > we> > > > > > > better hope and pray for good solid

intuition! Oh > yes ... > > by the> > > > > > > way ... even those

who restrict themselves to Rasi & > > Navamsa,> > > > > > > flexibly

twist their principles to suit the results, > if not> > > > > lagna,> >

> > > > > then chandra lagna ... so on and so forth!> > > > > > >> > >

> > > > Point is ... serious minded & honest research is > required > >

to> > > > > come up> > > > > > > with principles and then these should

be tested > > thoroughly. SJC> > > > > is> > > > > > > in the

process of doing it ... although there is no > formal> > > > > process>

> > > > > > for it. We will be taking this matter seriously in the > >

coming> > > > > years!> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Another point, Pt

Sanjay Rath doesn't like to spoon > > feed ... he> > > > > > >

likes/expects his student to think thoroughly, to whet > > their> > > >

> > > intelligence! Nothing comes easy ... Adversity breeds > > CHARACTER!>

> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > New

parameters are introduced to fit the event which > is> > > > > already>

> > > > > > known.> > > > > > > > On this list some time back one had an

example of > > father's> > > > > death.> > > > > > > For> > > >

> > > > that they used 7th from 9th from sun in > dwadashansha. Now> > > >

> why ? Why> > > > > > > > not 7th from 9th from ravi in rashi chart ?Then

why > not > > 2nd> > > > > from> > > > > > > 9th> > > > > > >

> from ravi. Then one can use arudh lagna of d-12 if > one > > does> >

> > > not> > > > > > > find> > > > > > > > it there , then aurdh of 9th

in rashi then arudh of > 9th > > in D-> > > > > 12. It> > > > > >

> > can get confusing very fast.This way one can cover > all 12> > > > >

rashis> > > > > > > and I> > > > > > > > am sure the graha whose dasha

you are running at the > > time of> > > > > the> > > > > > > known>

> > > > > > > event will be there in one of those.> > > > > > >> > >

> > > > I am sure, not even Maharishi Jaimini was spoonfed!! > He > > too

must> > > > > > > have exprimented, just like Pt. Sanjay Rath, KN Rao >

and > > come up> > > > > with> > > > > > > idioms & principles. And

as I said before, I am not > sure, > > if> > > > > even> > > > > >

> you have a fool-proof methodology of predicting > events, > > without>

> > > > > > beating around the bush!> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> >

> > > > > >> > > > > > > > My point is ,test priciples on charts you have

and > > develop a> > > > > > > > consistent principle applicable to

atleast 75 percent> > > > > cases.Then> > > > > > > make> > > > > >

> > it a principle. Do not make rules as you go based on > the > > chart>

> > > > you> > > > > > > > have in front of you.BTW there are principles

that > have > > been> > > > > > > developed> > > > > > > > by

peope like KN Rao, BV Raman, master those first. > > Trust me> > > > >

they> > > > > > > work> > > > > > > > in majority of cases> > > > >

> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Principles, should especially be tested

on the basis of> > > > > probability,> > > > > > > like Narasimha said,

if the likelihood of an event > > happening is> > > > > high> > > >

> > > and if you give a numerous paramters explaining the > event, > >

these> > > > > > > principles are not probabalistically valid, although >

they > > may be> > > > > > > statistacally valid!!> > > > > > >> >

> > > > > Like explaining, the chara dasa aspecting chara > Bhratri > >

Karak> > > > > caused> > > > > > > birth of siblings!! I consider that

an incomplete and > a > > totally> > > > > > > inadequate research!>

> > > > > >> > > > > > > Warm Regards> > > > > > > Narayan> > > >

> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >

On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:02:57 -0000, mikefranc01> > > > > <mtravass@t...>>

> > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >

Hi Narasimha,> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I applied the same

logic in my chart and it shows > > something> > > > > else.> > > >

> > > > >> > > > > > > > > The time when my car was almost totaled (March >

1993,) > > I was> > > > > > > running> > > > > > > > > Cn-Li

Narayana dasa of D16, 4th from A4.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >

The second time I met with an accident was in Dec > 1996 > > and I> >

> > > was> > > > > > > > > running Aq-Li Narayana dasa of D16.> > > > >

> > > >> > > > > > > > > Both the accidents took place in zone 4:00:00 >

(East of > > GMT).> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I cannot apply

any of the principles that you > stated > > in your> > > > > > >

email> > > > > > > > > unless there are others, which can be applied, and >

you > > did> > > > > not> > > > > > > state.> > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > Could you assist here?> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >

> > Mike> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > November 14,

1963> > > > > > > > > Time: 14:03:00> > > > > > > > > Time

Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT)> > > > > > > > > Place: 73 E 55' 00",

15 N 18' 00"> > > > > > > > > Margao, Goa, India> >

> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > vedic astrology, "Narasimha > >

P.V.R.> > > > > Rao"> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > <pvr@c...>

wrote:> > > > > > > > > > -> > > > > > > > >

> Narasimha P.V.R. Rao> > > > > > > > > > To:

> > > > > > > > > > Wednesday, March 16,

2005 11:53 PM> > > > > > > > > > Shodasamsa Narayana dasa (Re:

Accident > > schematic)> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >

> > > > > > > > Dear Sanjay Prabhakaran,> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >

> > > > > D16 is the chart for all Sukha and Hence Cars > come > > under>

> > > > > > this.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Here is

some jist for analysing all yogas> > > > > (combinations) in> > > > >

> > D16> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > 1. A4 is to be

considered for Cars. Here A4 > > should be> > > > > > > taken in> >

> > > > > > > D16.> > > > > > > > > > > 2. 6th and 8th house cause worries

and > anxieties> > > > > > > respectively,> > > > > > > > > in D16

they> > > > > > > > > > > will show for matters related to cars and >

> other> > > > > sukha.> > > > > > > > > > > 3. Marakas to sign of

A4 will destroy the car.> > > > > > > > > > > Marakas primarily being

2nd and 7th.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Now for Dasas

which will activate the Yoga's > > mentioned> > > > > above.> > > >

> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Add badhaka sthana in shodasamsa also as a >

potential> > > > > problem> > > > > > > sign.> > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > My birthdata is: 4th April 1970, 5:47:13 pm > (IST),> >

> > > > > Machilipatnam,> > > > > > > > > India> > > > > > > > > >> >

> > > > > > > > I had a vehicular accident on 5th December 1996 > at > >

6:30 pm> > > > > > > (EST),> > > > > > > > > Wilmington, MA. I was not

hurt, but the car > > was "totalled".> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >

> > > > As per D-16 Narayana dasa, this happened in Li-Ta> > > > >

antardasa.> > > > > > > In my> > > > > > > > > D-16, Ta is the badhaka

sthana and contains > 3rd/12th > > lord> > > > > > > Mercury and> >

> > > > > > > nodes. It is the 12th house from A4, showing the > loss > >

of a> > > > > > > vehicle.> > > > > > > > > It is also the 8th house

from the 4th house, > showing> > > > > problems in> > > > > > > > >

sukha.> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Those who are into the

three parts of rule of > > Narayana> > > > > dasa> > > > > > > > >

interpretation can test that too. Mahadasa sign Li > is a> > > > > > >

seershodaya> > > > > > > > > rasi. So it gives its results in the first

one-> third. > > Its> > > > > lord> > > > > > > Venus> > > >

> > > > > is also in a seershodaya rasi (Le). So he gives > his > >

results> > > > > in> > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > second

one-third. The last one-third gives the > results > > of> > > > > > >

occupants> > > > > > > > > and aspectors. There are four candidates and they

> are > > Venus,> > > > > > > Rahu,> > > > > > > > > Ketu and

Mercury in the order of longitudes. We > divide > > the> > > > >

last> > > > > > > one-> > > > > > > > > third of the dasa into 4 equal

parts and give them > to > > these> > > > > 4> > > > > > >

planets> > > > > > > > > in this order. The result of Rahu's aspect on >

mahadasa > > sign> > > > > is> > > > > > > given> > > > > > > >

> in Oct 1996-Aug 1997. Rahu is the 8th lord, > occupies > > badhaka> >

> > > > > sthana> > > > > > > > > and aspects the 4th house of vehicles

Libra. So > the > > sub-> > > > > period> > > > > > > in> > >

> > > > > > question resulted in vehicle problems. Not only > did I > >

have> > > > > an> > > > > > > > > accident in Dec 1996, but the new car

I bought in > Jan > > 1997> > > > > > > suffered> > > > > > > > >

too. It was hit by people twice when it was parked > in a> > > > >

parking> > > > > > > lot.> > > > > > > > > I did not see who hit it,

but someone hit it > twice. > > After> > > > > these> > > > > > >

> > repeated incidents, I sold that "unlucky" car and > > bought> > > >

> another> > > > > > > new> > > > > > > > > car in Sept 1997. All these

are due to the sub-> period > > giving> > > > > the> > > > > > > >

> results of Rahu's aspect on Li. It so happened > that the> > > > > > >

antardasa was> > > > > > > > > also of Ta, which contains Rahu.> > > >

> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > As per Vimsottari dasa also, it was

Mercury-Ketu > > antardasa.> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >

In my annual Tithi Pravesha chart of 1996-97, D-> 16 > > had Leo> > >

> > > > rising,> > > > > > > > > lagna lord Sun in 6h (!!) with 6th lord

Saturn, > Rahu > > and> > > > > Ketu.> > > > > > > Saturn-> >

> > > > > > > Saturn antardasa as per annual Tithi Ashtottari > dasa > >

was> > > > > running> > > > > > > from> > > > > > > > > Dec 3 to

Dec 6. Accident was on Dec 5!> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > The

technique of Tithi Pravesha never seizes to > > amaze me!> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > > > > May Jupiter's light shine on us,> > > > > > > > >

> Narasimha> > > > > > > > > >

----------------> ----> > ------> >

> > > ----> > > > > > > -> > > > > > > > > > Free Jyotish lessons

(MP3):> > > > > http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net> > > > > > > > > >

Free Jyotish software (Windows):> > > > > http://www.VedicAstrologer.org>

> > > > > > > > > SJC website: http://www.SriJagannath.org> > > > > > > >

> > ----------------> ----> > ------>

> > > > ----> > > > > > > -> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >

> Archives: vedic-> astrology> > > > > > > >

>> > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic-> > >

> > > > astrology/info.html> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > To

UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ....... May

Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >

|| Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri > Krishnaarpanamastu > > ||> > >

> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Sponsor>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >

________________________________> > > > > > > > > Links> >

> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > vedic astrology/> > > > > > > >

>> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > vedic astrology> > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > >

Terms of> > > > > > > Service.> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >

> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Archives:

vedic astrology> > > > > > >> > > > > > >

Group info: vedic-> > > > >

astrology/info.html> > > > > > >> > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-> > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > > > > >

>> > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu >

||> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Sponsor>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Children

International> > > > > > > Would you give Hope to a Child in need?> > >

> > > >> > > > > > > ·Click Here to meet a Girl> > > > > > > And Give

Her Hope> > > > > > > ·Click Here to meet a Boy> > > > > > > And Change

His Life> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Learn More> > > > > > >> > >

> > > > ________________________________> > > > > > > Links>

> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > vedic astrology/> > > > > > >> >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

vedic astrology> > > > > > >> > > > > > >

> Terms of> > > > >

Service.> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >

> > > Archives: vedic astrology> > > > >> >

> > > Group info: vedic-> >

astrology/info.html> > > > >> > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to

vedic astrology-> > > > > > >> > > > >

> > > > >> > > > > ||

Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > > > >> > > > >>

> > > > Sponsor> > > > > > > > > >> >

> > > ________________________________> > > > > Links> > >

> >> > > > > > > > > >

vedic astrology/> > > > >> > > > > To

from this group, send an email to:> > > > >

vedic astrology> > > > >> > > > > Your use

of is subject to the Terms > of > > Service.> >

> >> > > > > > > > > > > > Archives:

vedic astrology> > > > Group info:

vedic-> astrology/info.html> > > > To

UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > > >

> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > > > || Om Tat Sat

|| Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || > > > > > >

Groups Sponsor > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

->

-----------> > Links> > > > a.. To visit your group

on the web, go to:> > vedic astrology/> >

> > b.. > >

vedic astrology> > > > c.. Your use

of is subject to the Terms > of Service.> > > > > >

Archives: vedic astrology> > Group info:

vedic astrology/info.html> > To UNSUBSCRIBE:

Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > ....... May

Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri

Krishnaarpanamastu || > > > Sponsor >

> Children International >

Would you give Hope to a Child in need? >

> · Click Here to meet a Girl>

And Give Her Hope > >

· Click Here to meet a Boy>

And Change His Life > >

Learn More > > >

> > > > > >

>

Links> > >

vedic astrology/> > b.. To

from this group, send an email to:>

vedic astrology> > c.. Your use of

Groups is subject to the Archives:

vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......