Guest guest Posted March 16, 2005 Report Share Posted March 16, 2005 Hare Rama Krishna Dear Partha Guru, Namaskar Sometimes words play on our minds. Here it seems like there is a mind set on the word 'Sadhana'; what it can be & what it can not be! If someone is not getting some thing easily, then it is imperative that some more effort is required to be put in. As sometime you said, attachment to a word is a problem, you may renounce(!) the word 'Sadhana' and may say the same using a different (preferably english) word. regards suryaviswanadham vedic astrology, "V.Partha sarathy" <partvinu@g...> wrote: > > Dear Hari > > Thanks for sharing your thoughts. The thread started when i said that > sadhana is required to understand rahu as AK , which logically extend > to the fact that sadhana is required to understand the subtle > concepts of astrology. > Now Shri Prabodh says that it is not necessary. I agreed to it. But > he also talks of medieval brahminisim, parampara, exclusivity etc. > What was originally given as an opinion has been turned to a big war > of words. > > i am really at loss to understand how two different things can be > said on the same issue. > > This is all the more surprising as he admits that he does pooja etc > for the overall bettrement in Jyotish learning(these is exactly his > statement), but denies the role of sadhana in understanding the > specific aspects. > Now what does he mean by "overall betterment in jyotish?" > > He says that he did Saraswati puja before starting classes, but > denies its utility in understanding maths. I am again at loss to > understand what does this exactly mean. > This could mean that people do pooja, read mantras, but can deny the > role of mantras/sadhanan in understanding the subjects?? Then why the > heck do the poojas, mantras, simply start the learning without giving > any respect to any diety, and start learning. Why this double > standards? Every literate person can read books of Shri Sanjay rath, > but to understand the layer of meanings in some important aspects of > Jyotish, i wonder how many can without any sadhana, without any guru > mantra. > > best wishes > partha > > > vedic astrology, "onlyhari" <onlyhari> > wrote: > > > > ||Om Brihaspataye Namah|| > > > > Dear Prabodh, > > > > Namaste. You are saying: > > > > (1) To study Jyotisa sastra, sadhana is not necessary. > > (2) To make predictions, sadhana is necessary. > > > > Have I understood you correctly? Are you saying these are two > > different aspects and is to be understood in the sense that one need > > not have knowledge to predict correctly? > > > > I recently read a book on karma by Robert Svoboda, in which > Svoboda's > > guru, when asked a question on what is required to predict > correctly, > > replied "85% knowledge, 15% intuition". > > > > If I combine your statement that sadhana is necessary for prediction > > along with this, does it not follow that sadhana is also necessary > to > > obtain the correct knowledge i.e., knowledge to predict correctly? > > > > kind regards > > Hari > > > > vedic astrology, "Prabodh Vekhande" > > <amolmandar> wrote: > > > > > > Guruji Pranam > > > > > > Actually I knew that you will be laughing at me! I am sorry that > I got > > > into this discussions in this fashion. May be my RMPY makes me to > do > > > that! But you will see that I never said that performing Sadhana > for > > > correct prediction should not be done. Aap ke sath raha ke Itana > to > > > maine sikh hi liya hai. Pahale maine jab aap ke Sadhana ke bare me > > > kaha tha it was on your predictive ability. It is under stress > > > because of your frequent travelling. You dont get Time to do your > > > Sadhana and that is why your prediction may go worng. I still say > that > > > you must get more time to perform your Sadhana(for more and more > > > correct prediction and become undisputed HERO of Vedic > Astrology). > > > > > > But I still do not understand why Sadhana of some kind is > required in > > > learning Jyotish. On the other hand learning regularly should be a > > > Sadhana.I learn from you when I am with you and every day I learn > from > > > you(from your books no sadhana involved!) but what sort of > Sadhana is > > > required for that. My basic objection was on to understand Ak as > rahu > > > you require Sadhana. Yane Jyotisha nahi huaa koi Bhuta vidya hui. > Sir > > > dont take me otherwise but there are more and more people getting > into > > > this kind of spiritual aspect which is not required in my opinion > for > > > learning jyotish. > > > Now a days with your blessings,knowledge and permissions, I am > > > teaching Jyotisha at SJC Nagpur. We have now good collections of > 25+ > > > students and almost every body is very happy to learn(from me!). > We > > > have people from every walk of life and most of them are 40+. I > was > > > just thinking what will they think if I tell them that to learn > (not > > > predict) some kind of Sadhana is required! > > > > > > I know that Partha is Dhan Lagna which you like most! and hence > may > > > find his opinion nearer to your heart! Pur Hamare taraf bhi Kripa > > > drishti rakhana. Atleast I require it most. Guru he nahi raha to > mera > > > RMPY kya kam ka??? > > > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Astrology. > > > > > > Prabodh Vekhande > > > Jai Jai Shankar > > > Har Har Shankar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.