Question regarding natural significator occupying the corresponding bhava...

[Guest guest]

Respected Members,

 

I have a question.

 

In the natal rasi chart, the occupation of any bhava

by the corresponding natural significator is

considered bad by many astrologers. For instance,

Jupiter occupying 5th house in the natal rasi chart is

regarded as inauspicious for the native's children.

 

There is infact a sanskrit verse on this dictum,

which, if I am not wrong, goes like this "karako bhava

nasaka:".

 

The presence of an inherent benefic like Jupiter in

the 5th house is extremely good for the native. Why

would it be not good for children ? Can anybody

explain the logic behind this dictum ?

 

Regards,

Vijayanand.

 

 

______________________

India Matrimony: Find your life partner online

Go to: http://.shaadi.com/india-matrimony

[Guest guest]

Dear Vijayanand,

 

There is opinion, that karaka in this verse means chara karaka

(atmakaraka, dapakarkaa etc.)

 

with regards,

Rafal

 

>

> I have a question.

>

> In the natal rasi chart, the occupation of any bhava

> by the corresponding natural significator is

> considered bad by many astrologers. For instance,

> Jupiter occupying 5th house in the natal rasi chart is

> regarded as inauspicious for the native's children.

>

> There is infact a sanskrit verse on this dictum,

> which, if I am not wrong, goes like this "karako bhava

> nasaka:".

>

> The presence of an inherent benefic like Jupiter in

> the 5th house is extremely good for the native. Why

> would it be not good for children ? Can anybody

> explain the logic behind this dictum ?

>

> Regards,

> Vijayanand.

>

>

>

___________________

___

> India Matrimony: Find your life partner online

> Go to: http://.shaadi.com/india-matrimony

[Guest guest]

Dear Vijayanand,

read what jataka Parijata says about 5th house and Jupiter below. From

first line alternate line is in Sanskrit99 fonts.

mInSwae=TyLp sNtaníapSw k«CÀsNtit>,

ménastho'tyalpa santänaçcäpastha kåcchrasantatiù|

AsNtit> k…lIrSwae jIv> k…MÉe n

sNtit>.30.

asantatiù kulérastho jévaù kumbhe na santatiù||30||

puÇSwane k…lIre va mIne k…MÉe zrasne,

putrasthäne kulére vä méne kumbhe çaräsane|

iSwtae yid suracayRStT)l k…ête n&[am!.31.

sthito yadi suräcäryastatphala kurüte nåëäm ||31||

Jupiter in Pisces gives alpa (few) children, in Sagittarius problematic

and none in Cancer and Aquarius. In 5th if in Cancer, Pisces, Aquarius

or sagittarius similar results are obtained.

Chandrashekhar.

Vijayanand K wrote:

Respected Members,

I have a question.

In the natal rasi chart, the occupation of any bhava

by the corresponding natural significator is

considered bad by many astrologers. For instance,

Jupiter occupying 5th house in the natal rasi chart is

regarded as inauspicious for the native's children.

There is infact a sanskrit verse on this dictum,

which, if I am not wrong, goes like this "karako bhava

nasaka:".

The presence of an inherent benefic like Jupiter in

the 5th house is extremely good for the native. Why

would it be not good for children ? Can anybody

explain the logic behind this dictum ?

Regards,

Vijayanand.

______________________

India Matrimony: Find your life partner online

Go to: http://.shaadi.com/india-matrimony

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Vijayanand,

 

Brhat Parasara Hora Sastra as translated by Harihar Majumdar has the following

shlokas in the Chapter on Curses:

 

putrasthanagate jive paripurna balanvite

lagneshe bala sanyukte putrayoga ime smrita. (ch 21 shloka 116)

 

If Jupiter with complete strength is in the fifth, and the lagna lord is strong,

then there is bahuputra yoga.

 

Putrasthane tadishe va gurau va shubhavikshite

shubhena sahite vapi vahuputram samadishet

 

If the fifth lord or Jupiter is in the fifth house conjoined or aspected by

benefics, then there is bahupuyra yoga.

 

Just to show one must be open to all possibilities of interpretations.

 

Best regards,

 

Sarbani

 

Vijayanand K wrote:

Respected Members,I have a question.In the natal rasi chart, the occupation of

any bhavaby the corresponding natural significator isconsidered bad by many

astrologers. For instance,Jupiter occupying 5th house in the natal rasi chart

isregarded as inauspicious for the native's children. There is infact a

sanskrit verse on this dictum,which, if I am not wrong, goes like this "karako

bhavanasaka:".The presence of an inherent benefic like Jupiter inthe 5th house

is extremely good for the native. Whywould it be not good for children ? Can

anybodyexplain the logic behind this dictum ?

Regards,Vijayanand.______________________

India Matrimony: Find your life partner onlineGo to:

http://.shaadi.com/india-matrimonyArchives:

vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......

Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......