Pt. Rath: COVA Narayan Dasha Clarification

[Guest guest]

Dear Sanjay Ji,

 

Pranaam,

 

On Page 233 of COVA, while elaborating on Chart 64, even though the

Narayan Dashas start from the 7th Bhava from Lagna, the Dasha of

Aquarius is not deemed to give the results of Leo, the 7th

therefrom, but analysed in itself. What are the peculiarities in

this chart that the 7th from Dasha Rashi has not been considered?

 

In your text on Narayan Dasha, you have remarked that you would

explain more about Narayan Dasha as time goes on.

 

Also, in the chart study cited, you have said that since Aquarius is

a malefic Rashi, its results would obtain last in the Rule of Three

Parts. Does the Rashi have to be both malefic and Prishthodaya for

the results of last third of the period to apply? Unless I remember

incorrectly, Kumbha is a Sheershodaya Rashi. Perhaps I recall the

classification from your Shishya Narasimha Rao's book. If I am

mistaken about this point, I do beg your pardon.

 

In the event, this is true, kindly explain if the Rashi's nature as

well as mode of rising is to be seen for the Rule of Three Parts for

judging Narayan Dasha.

 

I do not have a text I can refer to at this moment but maybe the

Sheershodaya Rashis are Mithun, Simha, Kanya, Tula, Vrishchik and

Kumbha.

 

Regards.

 

Anurag Sharma.

New Delhi.