Sambandha & Drishti (Shripal, et all)

[Guest guest]

||| Hare Rama Krishna |||

 

Dear Shripal and List Members, Namaskaar.

 

Shripal – conjunction and aspects are 2 separate things. Sambandha and

Drishti – otherwise they could have just used 1 word.

 

Sitting alongside me need not mean we are facing each other. However,

we do influence and interact. When we are not in the same room, and

are rather looking across each other through a window, it's a

different scenario.

 

Rather than arguing some semantics and definitions, I would have you

read what the Maharishis wrote. Try to get the original source /

Sanskrit. A snippet is below.

 

Bhat Parasara Hora Shastra Translation:

 

Ch. 8. Drishtis of the Rashis

 

1-3. Rashi Drishtis. O Maitreya, now detailed are the Drishtis,

emanating from

the Rashi Mesh etc. Every Movable Rashi drishties the 3 Fixed Rashis,

leaving

the Fixed Rashi adjacent to it. Every Fixed Rashi gives Drishti to the

3 Movable

Rashis, barring the adjacent Movable Rashi. And a Common Rashi gives a

Drishti

to the other three Common Rashis. The Grah in a Rashi gives the same

Drishti, as

the Rashi (in which the Grah is) does.

 

4-5. Dristhis of the Grahas. A Grah in a Movable Rashi gives a Drishti

to the

other 3 Fixed Rashis, leaving the Fixed Rashi next to it. A Grah in a

Fixed

Rashi does not give a Drishti to the next Movable Rashi, but the

remaining 3

Movable Rashis. The one in a Common Rashi gives a Drishti to the

remaining 3

Common Rashis. Simultaneously a Grah in the Rashi, that receives a

Drishti, is

also subjected to the Drishti concerned.

==========

 

 

What of Nakshatra Drishtis?

:>

 

Best wishes,

Nitin.

 

|| Namah Shivaaya ||

 

 

 

 

 

 

I haven't put it in proper way ,What I want to say.Let

me come with some example.But I want from

members,Conjuct palnet aspect each other isn't it?