Guest guest Posted November 11, 2004 Report Share Posted November 11, 2004 Dear Jeyaram, No doubt the view that D-Charts have to be analyzed to understand the finer nuances is correct. Having said that, it is necessary to understand that they are but parts of the Rasi. Now if one is to apply Viveka,if the whole (Rasi) is strong then minor blemishes of a part one could tide over, whereas reverse may not be the case. Of course, this is my personal view, and those more learned than me might hold a different view. Chandrashekhar. Jeyaram wrote: Dear Gurus & List Members, Experts View: Most of the well-known astrologers maintain that all divisional charts should be studied along with Rasi Chart. Their logic is Rasi is a macroscopic view of the native and divisional chart is a microscopic view of individual matters. So what is not promised in the Rasi chart cannot be overridden by the Divisional Chart. Practical Example: JUPITER is a functional malefic for VIRGO & GEMINI natives because it suffers from Kendradhipati dosha. Let's assume that it is well placed (exalted, moolatrikona, own house etc.) in D-9, D-7 & D-10. Now should we consider it as a benefic for matters related to D-9, D- 7 & D-10 ? If yes, are not we contradicting the expert view ? Can the learned members throw some light on the above ? Thanks & Respectful Regards Jeyaram Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.