MahaPurusha Yoga in D10 - Vishwanatham Ji

[Guest guest]

Hare Rama Krishna

 

Dear Pradeep,

 

Sri Chandrasekhar is saying kshetra & Rasi are synonymous.

 

Rasi is a term we use more often, so sounds familiar. Let us say that

Kshetra is specifically used by Parasara, for bringing out something

different from 'Rasi', which we may call as the entire Zodiac. (Only

for the sake of discussion)

 

Regarding Divisionals, Parasara did not spoon-feed. Agreed. He did

say, from where the first dasamsa starts. Why is it needed, & why not

give the names of dasmasa (deities) alone. He is pointing to where

the planet in the particular dasamsa of the kshetra should go to.

 

When we place, Lagna simmilarly in dasamsa, we have 12 houses. Do you

agree or not?

 

Regarding 'Kshetras', where did Parasara say that there are only 7

kshetras or what does it mean to say a planet is in 'Kuja kshetra'?

(In Scorpio or Aries?)

 

Just my views for the time being, and you need not agree with them.

 

Thanks for your discussion. It becomes clear to me, that the zodiac

is to be seen in both time & space. What you are saying is divide

space but not time. What i feel is that, all three possibilities are

valid?

 

...Divide both, and go to the divisional chart as any other chart,

related to that area.

 

...Look at the particular amsa, but analyse it from the rasi chart.

 

...Look at the Kshetra of specific planet in Rasi, but analyse it in

the specific divisional chart. (e.g.10th lord in Rasi in the

Dasamsa).

 

When it comes to planets, Jupiter is the same for you and me. Which

makes you shine, as with many Dhanur Lagna people, but....

 

regards

viswanadham

 

vedic astrology, Pradeep Kumar

<vijayadas_pradeep> wrote:

>

> Dear Vishwanatham ji

>

> I think by experience knowledge and age you are ji for me.

>

> Terms will have different meanings based on context.When we say

SwaKshethra it refers to both the houses of any planet.Same is the

meaning when we say Kuja Kshethra or Budha Kshethra.

>

> No where we find any rules for houses in divisional construction as

per my limited knoweldge and understanding.We are arranging it in the

form of chakra for convenience.

>

> Divisions are the root.For example when a person is new to

astrology and sees all these divisional charts - he may think there

are 16 Lagnas.But actually how many Lagnas do we have?Only One.

>

> Lagna as we all know is the point(degree in a sign) which rises in

the eastern horizon at the time of our birth w.r to our place of

birth.This is only one.Now when we say Kshethra ,we look for the sign

which was rising and look for its lord.

>

> If it was Sag or Meena we say Lagna is in Guru kshethra.Now if 10

degrees was the Lagna rising - it means 10 degrees of Sag has already

crossed our eastern horizon before of our birth.Now Parashara has

taught us that first half in Sag is Surya Hora and hence we say our

Lagna is in Surya Hora.Similarly if the navamsha was cancer ,we say

Lagna is in the navamsha of Cancer.In a similar fashion we find other

Vargas of our Lagna.

>

> Similarly at the time of our birth we have only one surya, one

chandra etc.We find the Kshethra ,Hora ,Drekkana etc of all planets.

>

> Thus planets are subjected to different influences at different

planes.For example budhi is considered from 5th house.But this budhi

can have different planes or deeper planes.This is like

the 'Aasswadana Thala'.For example certain finer notes in music can

be enjoyed only after intense listening for many years.For this we

can find various harmonic patterns of 5th house.Thus sidhi (because

of many sidhis we can act with budhi) can be seen from finer position

of planets called Sidhamshas.Thus basically we are looking at the

influences on a planet or lagna at various planes through various

amshas.

>

> If we can fix the finest Varga, say for example if we are only

considering upto shashtyamsha - then if one can fix shastyamsha the

rectification is over.But understanding shastyamsha is not an easy

task.Thus rectification is more easy at grosser levels or Vargas

closer to outer world.

>

> Now the problem is we have only very few techniques known on how to

analyse these deeply.House considerations are property of a natal

chart as they are snapshot of the zodiac in shape and form.Divisions

are not charts.

>

> In Nadi there may be clear explanations for finer degrees of a

planet or lagna within a tattwa.Similarly there may be more knowledge

hidden somewhere and i am sure it will definitely come up some day.

>

> When i say divisions are not charts i am not belittling any

shcolars who have guided me to to gather fundamentals.Holding full

respect for the Gurus knowldege, we are just expressing our concerns.

Learning is a mutual process of discussion and debate between guru

and sishya.

>

> Thanks

>

> Pradeep

>

>

>

>

>

> The all-new My – Get yours free!