Guest guest Posted August 28, 2004 Report Share Posted August 28, 2004 The Analogy of planets to the Elements of the periodic table is Excellent. It gives a new perspective. It is brilliant. But is it the final proof. I dont think so. We may say its just the begining but lot more is to be done to justify all the sutras, yogas and rules mentioned in our ancient texts. Here are some of my thoughts and querries that I would invite your comments/explaination I find it a little unbelievable that Lunar mansion and the Solar mansion both coincide exactly at 0° i.e. The begining of Aries and the begining of Ashwini exactly overlaps. How is it possible that two natural phenomenon occur exactly at the same instance? Also let me know if I am wrong in having a feeling that Lunar mansions should be of unequal lengths. Though Rahu and ketu are not alloted ownership of any house in Solar mansions but in Lunar Mansions not only they are alloted the nakshatras but also so much importance is given that Ketu is alloted the first Nakshatra? Which phenomenon is responsible for the duration and the order in which dasas are alloted in Vimshottari dasas? If Rahu and Ketu are always 180° apart and are the two opposite points of the intersection path of earth around the sun and the moon around the earth then how come they are alloted different dasa periods? Building theories without the verification of the theorems is like building castle over sand. Uday Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.