Guest guest Posted November 25, 2004 Report Share Posted November 25, 2004 Hare Rama Krishna Dear Pradeep, Let me refer to Parasara's first sentence in the chapter on Zodiacal signs. He refers to Kala Purusha & the Limbs of Kala Purusha. i am not suggesting that We Divide, but merely saying what is already there. Also, he attributes different charecterstics to Scorpio and Aries, the so called 'Kuja kshetra' Coming to construction of charts, did Parasara ask us to construct any chart for that matter? If one can visualise the entire gamut in their mind (or mind's eye) there is no need for the drawing of charts. It is for ease of use we try to draw them down. If there is no chart, there would not have been any aspects of planets or Rasis? Is that what we are saying? The chapter on Divisionals makes it clear as to where the planets and Lagna would be placed in ....depending on which area you are looking at. In fact, when we move forward from Hora, it becomes more and more clear. When we moved from Kalapurusha lagna (Head), which is Aries we have already taken the first step to define an individual in one area? Then where is the hesitation to move to other areas and seek out more information on the individual. Anyway, thanks for the discussion. You should be appreciated for taking a contrarian view and expressing it boldly. Regards viswanadham Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.