MahaPurusha Yoga in D10 - Vishwanatham ji

[Guest guest]

Hare Rama Krishna

 

Dear Pradeep,

 

i avoid bringing any names other than Parasara.It is as per Parasara.

 

Just three things, to end the discussion.

 

1. Parasara called it shodasa vargas and so they are. After flip

flopping between Rasi & Kshetra, we say they are synonymous. So the

same question again, why does Parasara say 16 vargas and not Rasi &

15 vargas there from?

 

2. If there is a 'naisargika', naturally flowing chakra then that is

of KalaPurusha. The first division is a collection of Rasis/Kshetras

so on & so forth. Planets are influencing an arc of 30, 15, 10 etc.,

degrees, as we divide it further and further (as per Parsara's

teaching). Another pointer here, as per Parasara the planets/lagna

are moving signs in the divisionals. why should they be reckoned wrt

Lagna in D1 and not in other Dn, unless we are 100% sure that d2 to

d15 are derived from D1. This point feeds back into point no1.

 

3. Drawing of charts is for two purposes, as i understand: Ease of

use and to study them, they are depicted as 'Yantras'. i clarify

this, so that they may not be treated as useless.

 

Yo said one valid point, that the sum of parts is more than the

whole. You know that it is because of the interaction within the

parts.

 

regards

viswanadham