Guest guest Posted June 15, 2004 Report Share Posted June 15, 2004 Dear Prabodh Bhau, In normal circumstances (Till some time ago)this being would have been thrilled to hear that his work on Rahu is remarkable. But after understanding need to kill kartutva, it is accepted in passing. In fact it has been informed to TATSAT group to remove the undersigned's name from all files and replace with Noname. Only thing to stressto all Gurus is that Gurutva comes with experience and maturity of thoughts with age. Being well informed is not being a Gnani. Gna is the last letter of Alphabet. Beyong Gna there is nothing and this nothing is denoted by Na after Gna. Who can profess to know everything? Tatvam-Asi vedic astrology, "amolmandar" <amolmandar> wrote: > Dear Kanu Namste > > I just wanted to point out that for last few days Gurus are invloved > in confrontation which is unusal behaviour on the list. WHo am I to > question the idealogy of SJC? I dont have that much knowledge and > intelligence in Jyotish. I just expressed my surprise over > happenings on the list. If I remember correctly you are doing a > great job by teaching jyotish to kids. So 'guru' in you is hurt it > seems. I am extermly sorry in that case. I personally have no > problems from my guru as it is trikonesh and placed in other trikona. > > I did not say that person with noname id is SJC guru but pointed out > that his work on Rahu is remarkable and opposite to popular > perceptions of Rahu. One of the Guru made remark on RAhu/Jupiter and > got involved with a person who thinks opposites for Rahu/Jupiter. He > could not succeed in put forward his point. By this I did not want > to belittle SJC Guru or noname. Just an observation. > > > Sorry once again in case you feel that i crossed my boundries. > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce. > > > Prabodh Vekhande Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2004 Report Share Posted June 15, 2004 Dear ?/H/noname/nameisego etc etc, You seem to have many names now. good. You wrote QUote:- In normal circumstances (Till some time ago)this being would have > been thrilled to hear that his work on Rahu is remarkable. Unquote So you are agreeing that you are not normal. So you are not thrilled he, you are killing Kartutva. You say you want to kill kartutva, but keep replying. You are not affected, but "defend" the being. The being is omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient. THen why does it need to defend itself. In one mail you said that the being's peace is not affected by the garbage dumped on it. Your peace oh Sorry! the great being's peace is not affected. Then why does it react to Visti's mail. WHy the talk of headless etc. Your being is oscillating, oh sorry again, the great being's peace is getting affected. come back to being a normal human being partha vedic astrology, "nameisego" <nameisego> wrote: > > Dear Prabodh Bhau, > > In normal circumstances (Till some time ago)this being would have > been thrilled to hear that his work on Rahu is remarkable. > But after understanding need to kill kartutva, it is accepted in > passing. > In fact it has been informed to TATSAT group to remove the > undersigned's name from all files and replace with Noname. > > Only thing to stressto all Gurus is that Gurutva comes with > experience and maturity of thoughts with age. > Being well informed is not being a Gnani. > Gna is the last letter of Alphabet. > Beyong Gna there is nothing and this nothing is denoted by Na after > Gna. > Who can profess to know everything? > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > vedic astrology, "amolmandar" > <amolmandar> wrote: > > Dear Kanu Namste > > > > I just wanted to point out that for last few days Gurus are > invloved > > in confrontation which is unusal behaviour on the list. WHo am I to > > question the idealogy of SJC? I dont have that much knowledge and > > intelligence in Jyotish. I just expressed my surprise over > > happenings on the list. If I remember correctly you are doing a > > great job by teaching jyotish to kids. So 'guru' in you is hurt it > > seems. I am extermly sorry in that case. I personally have no > > problems from my guru as it is trikonesh and placed in other > trikona. > > > > I did not say that person with noname id is SJC guru but pointed > out > > that his work on Rahu is remarkable and opposite to popular > > perceptions of Rahu. One of the Guru made remark on RAhu/Jupiter > and > > got involved with a person who thinks opposites for Rahu/Jupiter. > He > > could not succeed in put forward his point. By this I did not want > > to belittle SJC Guru or noname. Just an observation. > > > > > > Sorry once again in case you feel that i crossed my boundries. > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce. > > > > > > Prabodh Vekhande Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.