MahaPurusha Yoga in D10 - Vishwanatham ji

[Guest guest]

Hare Rama Krishna

 

Dear Pradeep,

 

i almost missed you reply, reading mails after 3 days gap.

 

There is no communication gap. In fact we should be asking, if there

are bhavas (houses) in the divisional charts? (in D1 to D60).

Perhaps, there is no issue with drawing charts and also no doubt

about the nature of signs being same in all the divisionals. The

real question is should we reckon house placements in the divisionals

(because graha drishtis are related to houses; aspect on 7th house

etc.,).

 

Then what does D1 show? Physique, as per Parasara.

1.We have to take houses from Lagna's sign placement,here, to see

different parts of physique (of the native)

or 2. should we reckon Physique from the 'snap shot' we get at the

time of birth?

 

Since, we started to discuss yogas, in divisional charts, let us see

why yogas should not be reckoned in divisionals also.

 

Why you think, yogas cannot take place in different areas of life

(divisionals)? or you think they should happen by conjunction (being

in the same sign in the divisionals) only?

 

Sorry for asking so many questions, my idea is as much to learn as it

is to sort it out, if possible.

 

Thanks & regards

viswanadham

 

vedic astrology, "vijayadas_pradeep"

<vijayadas_pradeep> wrote:

>

> Dear Vishwanatham ji

>

> Thanks for your reply.

>

> Rashi or kshethra is a sign and hence the first varga.I think you

> are having rashi chakra as the first varga in mind and hence the

> confusion.

>

> For the same reason 16 vargas are part of the Rashi chakra or natal

> chart.How to arrive at the 16 divisions from the natal chart has

> been given by parashara in BPHS.(Thus i dont understand why

> parashara should say rashi & 15 vargas???)

>

> All the divisionals are derived from natal chart.D-1(kshethra or

> rashi) is the first varga.These formulas are very clear and evident

> and thus one hundred percent.

>

> Vishwanatham ji i have no more logic or communication skills to

> explain better.I have only explained what Parshara has advised on

> how to construct 16 Vargas from natal chart,there has been no

> assumption or invention.

>

> You can judge, and accpet as well as reject.

>

> Thanks a lot

> Pradeep