Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Karma vs. Spiritual Practice

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Hare Rama Krishna

 

Dear Sri Praveen,

 

Agreed that we all speculate and nothing wrong with that. Though, as

you said 'sabhda' is superior to 'anumana'. So, learning from a Guru

(GuruMukha) is important.

 

In any theory we present, Prayer to God should Not become redundant,

is the only submission i like to make. i mean when and if we say,

everything is predestined, then God worship provides what?

 

We can discuss this hours on, if you are the same Praveen i know from

Mumbai!

 

regards

viswanadham

P.S: 98202 28271

 

vedic astrology, Praveen Kumar

<chunnu2001@v...> wrote:

> Brilliant ! That is exactly my idea I have been pondering over for

years. Then concept of Karmaphala (consequences of own deeds) too

becomes questionable. When everything is predestined then what we can

mean by self and own karma. If a person has benefic influence on

Lagna he is bound to do good Karmas than the one with Mars and Saturn

influencing his personality. Even a great yogi's life is discussed

through his horoscope which itself means that there is nothing like

self generated things. There is a loose concept like partial

freewill. Late Shri B.V.Raman too has talked about semi independent

karma. But then, we enter a complex and controversial area with no

proof in support thereof. We have ample proofs of destiny but,

perhaps, none supporting Karmaphala. Now someone can ask, "why this

destiny then and how it functions". But then, we can better leave it

like many other unresolved mysteries of the world rather than putting

forward inexplicable theories.

>

> The only strong point favouring Karmaphala lies in the concept

of 'Shabda Praman' in Indian Philosophy. In Indian Philosophy we find

mention of 'Shabda Praman', that is words or actions of superior ones

are Praman (evidence) in itself and need not be substantiated by any

further proof. Hence the great Rishies (seers) who had given us

astrology which works, also preached about Karmaphala as the basis of

astrology spanning over more than one births. Today we don't have any

scientific explanation for planetary influences and so for Karmaphala

too.

>

> But still, the problem remains unresolved.

>

> Praveen Kumar (Mumbai)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...