Shri Jayendra Saraswati and related acts from Jayalalitha

[Guest guest]

Dear Respected members

 

A week before the arrest of Swamiji, the chief minister of kerala (Congress

party) had a personal meeting with Tamil Nadu C.M, Jayalalitha.A request was

put forth, towards granting of a bail, to the Muslim leader Abdul Nazar Madani

(Involved with Coimbatore Bomb Blasts, 1998) on humanitarian grounds, as he was

suffering from acute Diabetese.Jayalalitha had disagreed.She was not willing to

give bail as the case has been pending in Court. Also the kerala government's

request to speed up the court proceedings was also not entertained. According

to her, clear evidences were present against Madani, and as punishment is

certain, speeding up the procedure is also not of any use.Kerala government was

taking special interest on this case to sympathize with the emotions of the

Muslim’s and also the Muslim league which forms a major coalition partner in

the current government. In the scenario with Shri.Jayendra Saraswathi, one

cannot decide by media alone. Because if we

go by, media and majority, in Kaliyuga, the conclusions may not conform to

truth. But today Smt.Jayalalitha has made a statement in Legislative Assembly,

regarding strong evidence against Swami not only with respect to the current

case but also with another case from 2002.Any statement made in the assembly

goes into record and has to be made with care. If proved wrong, will definitely

harm Jayalalitha.Thus she would have gathered strong evidences regarding the

same, especially considering the sensitivity of this issue.One may not forget

the Hamsa Yoga present in Smt.Jayalalithas chart.Numerous Goondas were

efficiently tackled by Jayalalitha in Madras. In the past, governments have

failed to take actions against individuals, considering their associations with

various religious institutions. Appeasing minority/majority for votes by

political parties may be part of their Raja Tantra.But protecting criminals may

not be among the best expected from a Raja. In

Swamiji's case, we are not sure about the truth as we have only secondary

informations.But astrologers should be honest and should be free from bias

while doing astrological analysis. No one may not try to prove anyone right or

wrong without strong astrological support. Only and only this will lead towards

multiplication and awakening of true knowledge. Projecting some 'Rahu' as good

and some other 'Rahu' as devil based on convenience is strongly against

astrological principles. The reasoning should be uniform across. My opinion may

not be worth but is just another drop. If Swaamiji's hands are clean, there is

no worry needed. It holds true in the reverse case as well.''Every saint had a

past and every criminal a future''. Thanks

Pradeep

Discover all that’s new in My