MC of George Bush Jr.--To Narasimha

[Guest guest]

Hello Narasimha:

 

I'm not at all against election predictions. What bothers me is

predicting a win for the "favorite." It is common knowledge that Bush

is the favorite so predicting a win for him isn't challenging at all.

All the Jyotish needs to do is come up with a chart for the "winning"

candidate that has a lot of Raj-yogs. The REAL chart is always a

mystery. -- There are THREE charts of Kerry floating around, which

one is correct???

 

I'll also tell you why Bush is a favorite. The "thinking" Americans

live on the coasts, they can easily see through Bush's facade and

they'll vote for Kerry.

 

However, the Americans living in "middle America" are big time

idiots. I happened to recruit some of these idots from mid-west in

the 90s when Silicon Valley was going through a boom and "good"

employees weren't available. My "mid-west" recruits were college

educated, but were so dumb that they could be used as a definition

for "dumb." And, these are the folks who're going to get excited when

Bush says "fillper-flopper,protect America,Saddam Hussien

attacked New York," etc., etc.

 

And, these idot-Americans far outweight thinking-Americans in numbers

and they're all going to go vote for Bush; therefore, I can predict

without using Jyothis that Bush'll win.

 

You make a very good point about laid-off American in Ohio, but this

state is full of idot-Americans. Bush'll go there, liberally use the

words "Jesus Christ,Lord,protecting-America," etc. and these

voters, even though they're starving, will go vote for Bush because

they heard him say words that appeal to them.

 

Well, I don't mean to offend certain Americans, but that is the

American reality--most Americans aren't too smart. America produces a

few "Bill Gates," but many idots who're unemployed and starving due

to Bush's policies, but readily go vote for him as he uses the

words "Lord Jesus" and "protecting-America" so often.

 

Kerry is a prolific thinker and has served United States for over 20

years, yet the idot-Americans won't vote for him becaues he doesn't

bring Chritianity in his speeches, doesn't say he is doing "Lord's

work" and speaks logically in complete sentences.

 

Mukund

 

vedic astrology, "pvr108" <pvr@c...> wrote:

> Namaste Mukund,

>

> You don't have your facts right. The opinion poll results are too

> close in several battleground states. For example, you say Bush is

> sure to win in Ohio. As per the latest Gallup poll conducted during

> Sept 25-28, Bush leads 49 to 47 in Ohio. That is too close to call

> and well within the error margin. It does not need a miracle for

> Kerry to close that gap. Layoffs and outsourcing are a major issue

> in Ohio. Mind you, the debate on the domestic issues is yet to

come.

> One solid debate performance on jobs can tilt Ohio in Kerry's favor.

>

> While the situation is quite clear in some states, the race is too

> close in several "battleground" states. It is most certainly true

> that Bush and Kerry still have an almost 50-50 chance. Your

> assertion that "Bush has already won" is totally misled and

> misleading. The race is wide open.

>

> One word as the admin of this list:

>

> Any astrologers who want to predict the result of the presidential

> election should feel free to do so. Do not let Mukund's unfair

> criticism influence your thinking. Even when there is a clear

> favorite, I always welcome predictions here. The existence of a

> clear favorite does not undermine the credibility of a prediction

> that is accompanied by astrological reasoning. Moreover, we do not

> have a clear favorite in this 50-50 race. Mukund is not right in

> saying that "Bush has already won" and please ignore him.

>

> May Jupiter's light shine on us,

> Narasimha

>

> PS: After reading more of the media reaction tonight, I want to

> concede that my prediction that Bush will come out with a little

bit

> of advantage in this close debate is wrong. It was Kerry who had a

> little bit of advatange. However, I think my broader prediction

that

> it will be an evenly contested debate is correct, as most pundits

> agree that neither hit a "home run".

>

> PPS: My last prediction was only about yesterday's debate. It was

> not about the final election outcome. I am still grappling with all

> the contradictory influences. I have not yet made a prediction on

> who will win. I said in July when Bush's numbers were down that

Bush

> would rebound from September first week, as Saturn and Jupiter were

> moving from 10th and 12th to 11th and 1st respectively from his

> natal Moon. That did happen and Bush had a rebound. However, that

> was also a limited prediction and I have not yet predicted the

final

> outcome.

>

> > Hello Sunil:

> >

> > Bush has already won. To be a winner, a candidate needs 270

> > delegates. As of today, Kerry has only 237 delegates,i.e.

> California,

> > Washigton and Oregon on the West Coast; New York, Massachusets,

> New

> > Hampshire, other little states on the East Coast are already

> voting

> > for Kerry, but between them there aren't enough delegates to give

> > Kerry a victory.

> >

> > It'll be a miracle if Kerry is able to change the hearts/minds of

> > voters in 3-4 big states like Florida, Ohio, Nevada to amass the

> > additional 33 delegates he needs in his pocket to win.

> >

> > In United States, bigger the state, higher the number of

delegates

> > from that state. California has the highest number of delegates

> and

> > Kerry has CA in his pocket.

> >

> > But in 30 more days, Kerry needs many more states to vote in his

> > favor. It'll be a miracle if he is able to accomplish this. Also,

> > Americans have NEVER elected NEW leadership while it was at war

> and

> > it is unlikely that the American voters will change the

> leardership

> > now.

> >

> > Mukund

> >

> > vedic astrology, "suniljohn_2002"

> > <suniljohn_2004@h...> wrote:

> > > Hi Mukund ,

> > > Chandrashekharji had predicted the loss of Bush in the coming

> > > elections. I came to know this when a month back I had similar

> > > thoughts through different angle of his chart &

Chandrashekharji

> > > cleared my doubt on Marana position of Jup in Bush's chart, I

> think

> > > at the Puri conf he predicted that.

> > >

> > > Today again I was looking at his chart to recheck my earlier

> look

> > and

> > > was wondering how tough it is to predict as too many complex

> issues

> > > are confusing.

> > >

> > > Can anyone tell me how to see or find out MC position in Bush's

> > chart

> > > and in which Nav would it be. Btw which software can give these

> > > positions, any inputs from anyone.

> > >

> > > Kind regards,

> > >

> > > SJ

> > > Mumbai