Horoscopes of celebrities

[Guest guest]

Dear and respected members

 

I believe analysing the horoscopes of celebrities are not advisable

unless we are very sure about the accuracy of birth information.In

the case of Atalji as well there were numerous birth years(as

mentioned by Chandrashekhar ji) available with different Lagnas.Film

stars,cricketers and politicians may not always reveal their birth

info.Hence analysing their false horoscopes will make us difficult in

correlating dashas and known events.This may result in a wrong

perception of the subject.If the analysis is built on a weak

foundation(wrong birth info) then all the hard work is just destined

to collapse.1925 & 1926 were used in Ataljis case as he is a

celebrity!But in reality the actual year was 1924.This is nobodys

fault.The source of birth info is the hurdle in analysing celebrities.

 

Similar is the case with the usage of techniques.Various techniques

may be tried by freshers like me only if, one is thorough about the

usage and basics.Else it is a waste of time.Observing the horoscopes

of known people using standard techniques ,consistently over a period

of time, may be helpful.

 

Astrology is not acceptable to many becasue of lack of objectivity

and inconsitency in approaches.But if we observe the analysis of

learned astrologers we could see the difference.If our aim is to

promote astrology, we should indulge in the study, with patience

(perseverance) and sincerity.

 

Respect

Pradeep

[Guest guest]

om namo näräyaëäya|

Dear Vijaydas Pradeep,

Yes, you are correct.Regarding Shri Atal Ji's case,there are many of his birth

details.Anyhow I made an attempt to analyse his chart based on K.N.Rao's

informations.In future ,I am not going to analyse such charts,unless there is

reality in birth data.

With Shri Hari Vaayu Naama Smarana,

Ramadas Rao.vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep > wrote:

Dear and respected membersI believe analysing the horoscopes of celebrities are

not advisable unless we are very sure about the accuracy of birth

information.In the case of Atalji as well there were numerous birth years(as

mentioned by Chandrashekhar ji) available with different Lagnas.Film

stars,cricketers and politicians may not always reveal their birth info.Hence

analysing their false horoscopes will make us difficult in correlating dashas

and known events.This may result in a wrong perception of the subject.If the

analysis is built on a weak foundation(wrong birth info) then all the hard work

is just destined to collapse.1925 & 1926 were used in Ataljis case as he is a

celebrity!But in reality the actual year was 1924.This is nobodys fault.The

source of birth info is the hurdle in analysing celebrities.Similar is

the case with the usage of techniques.Various techniques may be tried by

freshers like me only if, one is thorough about the usage and basics.Else it

is a waste of time.Observing the horoscopes of known people using standard

techniques ,consistently over a period of time, may be helpful.Astrology is not

acceptable to many becasue of lack of objectivity and inconsitency in

approaches.But if we observe the analysis of learned astrologers we could see

the difference.If our aim is to promote astrology, we should indulge in the

study, with patience(perseverance) and sincerity.RespectPradeepArchives:

vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to

vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us

........

India Matrimony: Find your partner online.