Qs-To Chandrashekhar

[Guest guest]

Dear Chandrashekar,

 

I've always appreciated your posts, although not always sure about my

understanding of your messages.

I've been mulling over what you've written recently, and in fact I've been

trying to understand your approach for quite sometime- since long time ago,

I've noticed that you are applying principles differently-more strictly, so to

speak- for quite awhile while I was at the beginning of studying 'integrative

approach' I liked what you wrote because it was close to my 'thinking process'

at that time. Later I've been trying to muster all different methods and

techniques and am still

doing that, and was less focused on differences..

I would like to get a clearer picture of what you apply in your work. I have

some specific questions, I would like to see your response to /not all, just

major ones, 'don't be afraid!/

1/ It does make sense to me what you said that one should go with one dasa

system /to be better able to perfect it, to see clearly from which angle the

possible prediction failure came from, when that happens- please correct me if

my understanding is wrong, I am rephrasing your words based on my

understanding-

a/you use Vimsottari

b/do you use rashi dasa and when?

c/your suggestion seems to be to stick to Vims. D

2/Which karaka scheme do you use- seven or eight?

3a/Which varga charts do you use, and how far do you go with them

b/Do you consider aspects and degrees in varga charts?

4/Badhak question- for fixed signs in particular, what in your opinion takes

prevalence- YK /for Taurus Sa for example/ or its badhak nature?

5/Do you consider karaka roles in yoga formation?

6/Naksatras importance

8/Oh, no, seems more than enough for this time, ha, ha

 

I would appreciate your response whenever you get a chance to write.

My warmest wishes for a New Year, to you and your family!

Best regards, Anna

 

 

Find out what made the Top Searches of 2003