Guest guest Posted September 21, 2003 Report Share Posted September 21, 2003 Thanks for your reply to both my mails. I shall definitely try out watching for the stars, a bit tough for me to grasp what u wrote but a few re-reads shall make me grasp me more strongly. You have used the word "$B!G" in both your emails, I tried very hard to understand it but couldnt get it. Can you kindly explain what is the meaning of it. Best wishes Sunil John Mumbai ------- Original message -------From : Sarajit Poddar Date : Sun, 21 Sep 2003 08:21:31 +0800 Sarajit Poddar [sarajit (AT) (DOT) org] Sunday, September 21, 20038:06 AMTo: 'vedic astrology'RE: [vedic astrology] Seeing deeper astronomy in charts? || Jaya Jagannath || Dear Sunil, There are so many astronomical events occurring at each moment. We take those, which has the highest correlation with the earthly events and we have numerous clues from the seers on that. That $B!G (Bs why planetary distances are not used for the purpose of natal horoscopy at least. Best Wishes Sarajit Sunil John [suniljohn (AT) lycos (DOT) co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 12:50 AMvedic astrologySubject: [vedic astrology] Seeing deeper astronomy in charts? Dear Gurus and learned members, This recent closest transit of mars has made me ask this query. Why doesnt the astrological chart reflect astronomy in deeper meaning. For eg. On 27th Aug 2003 Mars was closest to the earth and in the next some yrs 2057 or 2257 it would be again closest. This shows I presume that Mars doesn't follow an equal pattern that is repeated every term and can get wayward in its rotation. 1. How does a astrologer that sees a chart born around 27th Aug2003 wth MArs in Aq differentiate between any other chart of Mars in Aq. When we open any chart we dont see the information lined up saying so and so planet was closest to Earth, which obviously means that the astrologer has to rely on memory of movement of planets and thereby special events. Mostly astrologers in India dont have softwares and see the patrika (chart on paper) which doesnt contain many details or of astronomy. Would I remember that in september of this year Mars was also closest to Moon, I might not after 50 yrs, although i know some astrologers do remember like CS Patel for eg. But wont most astrologers say born after this period forget about this closeness, how many of us knew 3 yrs back that Mars was going to come so close. Maybe everyone does, I can be wrong here Maybe this is a tangential, unsystematic thinking but maybe it can be of paramount importance for beginners. 2. Surely if we take for eg the original distance between Mars and Earth to be "A to Z" and say that on 27th Aug Mars reached the point "X", and somewhere in between it is at "L" when it started coming closer to the earth. Then wouldnt the effect of charts where Mars was at L and charts where it was at X, there has to be two different effects, why do astrologers dont look at this and why doesnt the natal chart reflect this aspect of astronomy or does it do - maybe as a beginner i fail to see subtler techniques. 3. why were we current generation treated to such a closeness of Mars and not those of the past 60,000 yrs, did it come and activate the Mars & Moon in all our charts, if so then when an astrologer saw a chart of a person born in the 70s, did he ever know that Mars is going to come close in 2003 and create much major impact than seen in the 70s in the chart? Pls guide, some might be stupid queries though so pardon. Best wishes Sunil John SIZE does matter The UK's biggest *Free* Web based mail 10 MB Free mail.lycos.co.uk Sponsor Create a signatureAttachments (maximum attachments size: 5 MB) Attach file from your computerAttach a file from your online drive -- [ Attach a contact ] -- Chandrashekhar Sharma chunnu2001 dhira.krsna.bcs dparagin Hanna Mac Hari Helen Helen Lowe J K Dasgupta Jann Ashworth Jay Weiss jjnet2000_in Karu Lakshmi Kary Laurie Harbour Linda Routhier Mark Kincaid Partha Sarthy prakashkandpal Prashant.achar Rajiv Karekar ramadasrao ramadasrao raonemani robyn.warren robynw432 Sunil John Sunil John suniljohn_2002 swee TV Rao tvrao_agd varahamihira vedic astrology Visti CancelSave draftSendPress Office | Advertise on Lycos | Jobs@Lycos | Add your Site to Lycos | Investor Relations | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Statement | Help 2003 Lycos, Inc. . SIZE does matter The UK's biggest *Free* Web based mail 10 MB Free mail.lycos.co.uk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 21, 2003 Report Share Posted September 21, 2003 Arial;color:black">|| Jaya Jagannath || Arial;color:black">Dear Sunil, Arial;color:black"> Arial;color:black">It might be a foul play of my email client or something else. I have not written that. “ "Times New Roman"">That color:black"> $B!G (Bs why planetary distances”, should be read as “ That is why planetary distances….” Best Wishes Sarajit 10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy"> 10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy"> Sunil John [suniljohn (AT) lycos (DOT) co.uk] Sunday, September 21, 2003 9:36 PM vedic astrology [vedic astrology] re: Matching astronomy to astrology Dear Guru Sarajitji, Thanks for your reply to both my mails. I shall definitely try out watching for the stars, a bit tough for me to grasp what u wrote but a few re-reads shall make me grasp me more strongly. You have used the word "$B!G" in both your emails, I tried very hard to understand it but couldnt get it. Can you kindly explain what is the meaning of it. Best wishes Sunil John Mumbai ------- Original message ------- >From : Sarajit Poddar Date : Sun, 21 Sep 2003 08:21:31 +0800 Sarajit Poddar [sarajit (AT) (DOT) org] Sunday, September 21, 20038:06 AM 'vedic astrology' RE: [vedic astrology] Seeing deeper astronomy in charts? || Jaya Jagannath || Dear Sunil, There are so many astronomical events occurring at each moment. We take those, which has the highest correlation with the earthly events and we have numerous clues from the seers on that. That $B!G (Bs why planetary distances are not used for the purpose of natal horoscopy at least. Best Wishes Sarajit Sunil John [suniljohn (AT) lycos (DOT) co.uk] Wednesday, September 17, 2003 12:50 AM vedic astrology [vedic astrology] Seeing deeper astronomy in charts? Dear Gurus and learned members, This recent closest transit of mars has made me ask this query. Why doesnt the astrological chart reflect astronomy in deeper meaning. For eg. On 27th Aug 2003 Mars was closest to the earth and in the next some yrs 2057 or 2257 it would be again closest. This shows I presume that Mars doesn't follow an equal pattern that is repeated every term and can get wayward in its rotation. 1. How does a astrologer that sees a chart born around 27th Aug2003 wth MArs in Aq differentiate between any other chart of Mars in Aq. When we open any chart we dont see the information lined up saying so and so planet was closest to Earth, which obviously means that the astrologer has to rely on memory of movement of planets and thereby special events. Mostly astrologers in India dont have softwares and see the patrika (chart on paper) which doesnt contain many details or of astronomy. Would I remember that in september of this year Mars was also closest to Moon, I might not after 50 yrs, although i know some astrologers do remember like CS Patel for eg. But wont most astrologers say born after this period forget about this closeness, how many of us knew 3 yrs back that Mars was going to come so close. Maybe everyone does, I can be wrong here Maybe this is a tangential, unsystematic thinking but maybe it can be of paramount importance for beginners. 2. Surely if we take for eg the original distance between Mars and Earth to be "A to Z" and say that on 27th Aug Mars reached the point "X", and somewhere in between it is at "L" when it started coming closer to the earth. Then wouldnt the effect of charts where Mars was at L and charts where it was at X, there has to be two different effects, why do astrologers dont look at this and why doesnt the natal chart reflect this aspect of astronomy or does it do - maybe as a beginner i fail to see subtler techniques. 3. why were we current generation treated to such a closeness of Mars and not those of the past 60,000 yrs, did it come and activate the Mars & Moon in all our charts, if so then when an astrologer saw a chart of a person born in the 70s, did he ever know that Mars is going to come close in 2003 and create much major impact than seen in the 70s in the chart? Pls guide, some might be stupid queries though so pardon. Best wishes Sunil John SIZE does matter The UK's biggest *Free* Web based mail 10 MB Free mail.lycos.co.uk || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || Terms of Service. Sponsor || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || Terms of Service. Create a signature Attachments (maximum attachments size: 5 MB) Attach file from your computer Attach a file from your online drive -- [ Attach a contact ] -- Chandrashekhar Sharma chunnu2001 dhira.krsna.bcs dparagin Hanna Mac Hari Helen Helen Lowe J K Dasgupta Jann Ashworth Jay Weiss jjnet2000_in Karu Lakshmi Kary Laurie Harbour Linda Routhier Mark Kincaid Partha Sarthy prakashkandpal Prashant.achar Rajiv Karekar ramadasrao ramadasrao raonemani robyn.warren robynw432 Sunil John Sunil John suniljohn_2002 swee TV Rao tvrao_agd varahamihira vedic astrology Visti Cancel Save draft Send Press Office | Advertise on Lycos | Jobs@Lycos | Add your Site to Lycos | Investor Relations | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Statement | Help 2003 Lycos, Inc. . margin-left:.5in;background-position-x:0px;background-position-y:0px">SIZE does matter The UK's biggest *Free* Web based mail 10 MB Free mail.lycos.co.uk Archives: vedic astrology To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || Your use of is subject to the Terms of Service. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 21, 2003 Report Share Posted September 21, 2003 there is rarely quition like this come as moon is so close to earth it does effect or daily life as it effect our weather and sea most. now mar has to effect by same principle to the childern born between aug and sept 2003. this is one reason i take astrology as sports and and past time as being too serious about its prediction method we are doomed to be called not scientific. so sunil your quition is valid and i think it was for man to be self relised otherwise we are born animal and die like animals and once awhile a man is made call it christ or buddha . i dont think they worried about planet and there effect on our life. raj --- Sarajit Poddar <sarajit wrote: > || Jaya Jagannath || > Dear Sunil, > > It might be a foul play of my email client or > something else. I have not > written that. " That $B!G (Bs why planetary > distances", should be read > as " That is why planetary distances.." > > Best Wishes > Sarajit > > > > Sunil John [suniljohn] > Sunday, September 21, 2003 9:36 PM > vedic astrology > [vedic astrology] re: Matching astronomy to > astrology > > > Dear Guru Sarajitji, > Thanks for your reply to both my mails. I shall > definitely try out > watching for the stars, a bit tough for me to grasp > what u wrote but a > few re-reads shall make me grasp me more strongly. > > You have used the word "$B!G" in both your emails, I > tried very hard to > understand it but couldnt get it. Can you kindly > explain what is the > meaning of it. > > Best wishes > > Sunil John > Mumbai > > > > ------- Original message ------- > From : Sarajit Poddar > Date : Sun, 21 Sep 2003 08:21:31 +0800 > > > > > Sarajit Poddar > [sarajit] > Sunday, September 21, 20038:06 AM > 'vedic astrology' > RE: [vedic astrology] Seeing deeper > astronomy in charts? > > || Jaya Jagannath || > Dear Sunil, > > There are so many astronomical events occurring at > each moment. We take > those, which has the highest correlation with the > earthly events and we > have numerous clues from the seers on that. That > $B!G (Bs why planetary > distances are not used for the purpose of natal > horoscopy at least. > > Best Wishes > Sarajit > > > Sunil John [suniljohn] > Wednesday, September 17, 2003 12:50 AM > vedic astrology > [vedic astrology] Seeing deeper astronomy > in charts? > > Dear Gurus and learned members, > > This recent closest transit of mars has made me ask > this query. Why > doesnt the astrological chart reflect astronomy in > deeper meaning. > > For eg. On 27th Aug 2003 Mars was closest to the > earth and in the next > some yrs 2057 or 2257 it would be again closest. > This shows I presume > that Mars doesn't follow an equal pattern that is > repeated every term > and can get wayward in its rotation. > > 1. How does a astrologer that sees a chart born > around 27th Aug2003 wth > MArs in Aq differentiate between any other chart of > Mars in Aq. > > When we open any chart we dont see the information > lined up saying so > and so planet was closest to Earth, which obviously > means that the > astrologer has to rely on memory of movement of > planets and thereby > special events. Mostly astrologers in India dont > have softwares and see > the patrika (chart on paper) which doesnt contain > many details or of > astronomy. > > Would I remember that in september of this year Mars > was also closest to > Moon, I might not after 50 yrs, although i know some > astrologers do > remember like CS Patel for eg. > > But wont most astrologers say born after this period > forget about this > closeness, how many of us knew 3 yrs back that Mars > was going to come so > close. Maybe everyone does, I can be wrong here > > Maybe this is a tangential, unsystematic thinking > but maybe it can be of > paramount importance for beginners. > > 2. Surely if we take for eg the original distance > between Mars and Earth > to be "A to Z" and say that on 27th Aug Mars reached > the point "X", and > somewhere in between it is at "L" when it started > coming closer to the > earth. > > Then wouldnt the effect of charts where Mars was at > L and charts where > it was at X, there has to be two different effects, > why do astrologers > dont look at this and why doesnt the natal chart > reflect this aspect of > astronomy or does it do - maybe as a beginner i fail > to see subtler > techniques. > > 3. why were we current generation treated to such a > closeness of Mars > and not those of the past 60,000 yrs, did it come > and activate the Mars > & Moon in all our charts, if so then when an > astrologer saw a chart of a > person born in the 70s, did he ever know that Mars > is going to come > close in 2003 and create much major impact than seen > in the 70s in the > chart? > > Pls guide, some might be stupid queries though so > pardon. > > Best wishes > > Sunil John > > SIZE does matter The UK's biggest *Free* Web based > mail 10 MB Free > mail.lycos.co.uk > > > Archives: > vedic astrology > Group info: > vedic astrology/info.html > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to > vedic astrology- > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu > || > > Terms of Service. > > Sponsor > > > > > Archives: > vedic astrology > Group info: > vedic astrology/info.html > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to > vedic astrology- > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu > || > > Terms of Service. > > Create a signature > Attachments (maximum attachments size: 5 MB) > Attach file from your computer > Attach a file from your online drive > -- [ Attach a contact ] -- Chandrashekhar Sharma > chunnu2001 > === message truncated === Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.