Hari's ishta devata (Why I was not drawn to..)

[Guest guest]

||Om Brihaspataye Namah||

 

Namaste Narasimha (and Sudharsan),

 

Much obliged to you both for your advice. It is really fascinating

to see how little by little, I am pulled to the Isthadevata!

 

Regarding your application of STS conditional nakshatra dasa in

another email of yours, can I conclude from your words that the

badhaka placed in any house gives inexplicable worries in the

matters shown by that house? I was under the impression that the

badhaka obstructs the activities shown by that house. For example, I

have SaR in 7th house of Ta. Ta is a fixed sign and the badhak house

is 9th from this i.e., Cp. So the badhak is in the 7th house. Should

I conclude that the badhak obstruct the event of marriage or gives

considerably worry in the area of marriage? From my personal

experience, I find it is more of the latter (anguish due to delay in

marriage). I am unable to pinpoint the correct astrological reason

for delay in marriage (logically, as per Sanjays teaching, it should

have happened when Ju transited in Ge, crossing over navamsa

position of 7th lord and influencing the 2nd from UL in rashi by

rasi dristhi. This is what Dick Francis would term as a dead cert!).

 

regards

Hari

 

vedic astrology, "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao"

<pvr@c...> wrote:

> Om Tat Sat

> Namaste Hari,

>

> > Namaste Narasimha,

> >

> > > Exalted planets usually don't show female deities.

> >

> > Very profound statement. I guess this sort of settles the doubt

I

> > had. But this raises another question: what can exalted planets

show

> > in general when considering the determination of isthadevata or

> > other forms of devatas?

>

> Male deities.

>

> > > In any case, don't worry too much. Even if you are not

worshipping

> > the correct form, eventually you will be led to the correct form

> > when your karma ripens enough!

> >

> > Again very profound. My Ma AK MD started in March 2002 roughly.

Till

> > now I havent started worshipping the Isthadevata directly but

three

> > incidents sort of steered me in this direction. First was

joining

> > this group and learning about Sanjays teachings on Atmakaraka

and

> > determination of isthadevata (circa Sep'02). Second was landing

at a

> > house whose family has been worshipping Durga for generations

and

> > seeing a huge idol of Durga Mata. The head of that house also

gave

> > me a book containing English translations of various prayers in

> > honour of Durga. Third incident was Sudharsan pointing out that

Rahu

> > could also be considered as Sri Varaha murthi. And now, your

mail in

> > answer to Jayashree's question! Would you say that my karma is

> > ripening enough? :-)

>

> I guess. :-)

>

> > > Sudharsan is quite learned. He would've considered all the

factors

> > before advising you. If you want me to take a look anyway, I

can.

> > But it will be necessary to take a stock of all the influences

on

> > Gemini to give a good advice. If you give your birthdata, I may

be

> > able to help. Just enclose the birthdata as text and don't

attach

> > the jhd chart. I don't get mails from this list to my mailbox

> > (that'd clutter my mailbox) and I read them off the web.

Currently,

> > quarantines all attachments and does not store them in the

> > archives. So, even if you send an attachment, I'll not be able

to

> > see it.

> > >

> >

> > I am not questioning Sudharsan's judgement at all. Just seeking

a

> > confirmation of the same. As advised by you, my birthdata is as

> > follows:

> >

> > 28/09/1971, 11.01 AM at Chennai (Theyegaraja Nagar), India.

> >

> > Thanks and my pranams to you.

> >

> > regards

> > Hari

>

> I basically agree with Sudharsan.

>

> Exalted Rahu is in a Mercurial sign with Mercury going to a

Saturnine sign. Both Rahu and his dispositor Mercury have

unobstructed argalas from Saturn. I would guess a Vaishnava form of

Rahu. Rahu with Venus in a Mercurial sign can show Padmavati and

Vekateswara. Get a picture of Lakshmi and Srinivasa (or Padmavati

and Venkateswara) and worship them together. That would be my

advice.

>

> May Jupiter's light shine on us,

> Narasimha

[Guest guest]

I Just want to share my impression on Badhak Sa in 7th- Saturn per its nature

doesn't 'deny' but 'delay' so 'inexplicable worries' in 7th H matters may

include delay-

 

I abstain from further comments,

and hope Narasimha will 'disregard' this and give full comment on this issue.

 

I would also ask if Badhak Saturn in 6th H is the worst badhak position- 6th is

good house for malefics, on one hand,

on another we learned that badhak in 6th indicates Black Magic, etc. which

indicates worsening of badhak indications by placement in bad house-

-What if badhak is benefic, in 6th?

What would the most appropriate 'summary', 'generalization' , "rule" be?

Thanks,

Annaonlyhari <onlyhari > wrote:

||Om Brihaspataye Namah||Namaste Narasimha (and Sudharsan),Much obliged to you

both for your advice. It is really fascinating to see how little by little, I

am pulled to the Isthadevata!Regarding your application of STS conditional

nakshatra dasa in another email of yours, can I conclude from your words that

the badhaka placed in any house gives inexplicable worries in the matters shown

by that house? I was under the impression that the badhaka obstructs the

activities shown by that house. For example, I have SaR in 7th house of Ta. Ta

is a fixed sign and the badhak house is 9th from this i.e., Cp. So the badhak

is in the 7th house. Should I conclude that the badhak obstruct the event of

marriage or gives considerably worry in the area of marriage? From my personal

experience, I find it is more of the latter (anguish

due to delay in marriage). I am unable to pinpoint the correct astrological

reason for delay in marriage (logically, as per Sanjays teaching, it should

have happened when Ju transited in Ge, crossing over navamsa position of 7th

lord and influencing the 2nd from UL in rashi by rasi dristhi. This is what

Dick Francis would term as a dead cert!).regardsHari--- In

vedic astrology, "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr@c...> wrote:> Om

Tat Sat> Namaste Hari,> > > Namaste Narasimha,> > > > > Exalted planets

usually don't show female deities.> > > > Very profound statement. I guess this

sort of settles the doubt I > > had. But this raises another question: what can

exalted planets show > > in general when considering the determination of

isthadevata or > > other forms of devatas?> > Male

deities.> > > > In any case, don't worry too much. Even if you are not

worshipping > > the correct form, eventually you will be led to the correct

form > > when your karma ripens enough!> > > > Again very profound. My Ma AK MD

started in March 2002 roughly. Till > > now I havent started worshipping the

Isthadevata directly but three > > incidents sort of steered me in this

direction. First was joining > > this group and learning about Sanjays

teachings on Atmakaraka and > > determination of isthadevata (circa Sep'02).

Second was landing at a > > house whose family has been worshipping Durga for

generations and > > seeing a huge idol of Durga Mata. The head of that house

also gave > > me a book containing English translations of various prayers in >

> honour of Durga. Third incident was Sudharsan pointing out

that Rahu > > could also be considered as Sri Varaha murthi. And now, your mail

in > > answer to Jayashree's question! Would you say that my karma is > >

ripening enough? :-)> > I guess. :-)> > > > Sudharsan is quite learned. He

would've considered all the factors > > before advising you. If you want me to

take a look anyway, I can. > > But it will be necessary to take a stock of all

the influences on > > Gemini to give a good advice. If you give your birthdata,

I may be > > able to help. Just enclose the birthdata as text and don't attach >

> the jhd chart. I don't get mails from this list to my mailbox > > (that'd

clutter my mailbox) and I read them off the web. Currently, > >

quarantines all attachments and does not store them in the > > archives. So,

even if you send an attachment, I'll

not be able to > > see it.> > >> > > > I am not questioning Sudharsan's

judgement at all. Just seeking a > > confirmation of the same. As advised by

you, my birthdata is as > > follows:> > > > 28/09/1971, 11.01 AM at Chennai

(Theyegaraja Nagar), India.> > > > Thanks and my pranams to you.> > > >

regards> > Hari> > I basically agree with Sudharsan.> > Exalted Rahu is in a

Mercurial sign with Mercury going to a Saturnine sign. Both Rahu and his

dispositor Mercury have unobstructed argalas from Saturn. I would guess a

Vaishnava form of Rahu. Rahu with Venus in a Mercurial sign can show Padmavati

and Vekateswara. Get a picture of Lakshmi and Srinivasa (or Padmavati and

Venkateswara) and worship them together. That would be my advice.> > May

Jupiter's light

shine on us,> NarasimhaArchives:

vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......