Rising Sign Vs Planet Two parts rule and dasha pravesh chart

[Guest guest]

||Om Brihaspataye Namah||

 

Dear SanjayP,

 

Could you please explain WHY the signs and grahas are classified

thus? Point me to some article or reference that has dealt with this

classification in detail.

 

regards

Hari

 

vedic astrology, sprabhakaran@s... wrote:

> || Om Gurave Namah ||

> Dear Rajesh,

> There are two different concepts

> 1. Rising nature of signs.

> Head Rising Signs: Le,Vi,Li,Sc,Aq,Ge

> Back Rising Signs: Ar,Ta,Cn,Sg,Cp

> Both Rising Sign: Pi

> 2. Rising nature of planets.

> Benefics are head rising. Malefics back rising. Jupiter is

dual

> rising. This I think is defined in B.V Raman's Book(Astrology for

> Beginners?. Also a commentary in Hora Sara (Trans & Commented by

R.

> Santhanam)is given as,

>

> 'Notes: The risings of Rāśis have already been

explained in th=

> e

> opening Ch.. Now, I give below the details of Grahodaya, or

risings

> of Grahas: 1) Sūrya, Rahu, Mangal and Śani rise with

hind part an=

> d

> hence called Prishtodaya Grahas. 2) Candr, Śukr and Budh rise

with

> their heads and hence called Shirshodaya Grahas. 3) Guru rises in

> both ways and hence Ubhayodaya Grah.'

>

> For Narayana Dasa Analysis both these facts needs to be taken.

>

> In Pg 77 footnote where you are refering the definition is based

on

> Lordship. You will see tha Pt Sanjay Rath has used this even in

Rajiv

> Gandhi's Case of analysis of Cancer dasa.

>

> The default definition is as per Sign as given in 1. Yes, The

Foot

> note is not very clear about the lord ship based reckoning.

>

>

> -Warm Regards

> S. Prabhakaran

> Om Tat Sat

>

>

>