Guest guest Posted December 18, 2003 Report Share Posted December 18, 2003 Dear Anna, > Major issue as it appears now is the manner of discussion, not the point.. Your judgment on my "manner" apart, you very clearly missed the crux of the discussion, going by the above. Mr. Vijay Kumar defined the concepts that he considers to be the part of "Parasharic system" and he talked about "not simultaneously recognising" certain other concepts (which he listed). In the same breath, he said this was fuss. Reading it, probably you too thought it was fuss. But this is a very big point. Requiring the user of D-charts, Vimsottari dasa etc (i.e. "Parasharic system) to "not simultaneously recognise" a lot of conepts like chara karakas, sign aspects, arudhas etc is a BIG point. It is a standard misconception not granted by either Parasara or Jaimini. Mind you, the issue is not whether Parasara should get credit for a certain concept or Jaimini. The issue is, for example, whether I can use arudhas when I judge Vimsottari dasa. The bone of contention is the phrase "not simultaneously recognise". Those who think this argument is over semantics haven't paid attention. The disagreement has quite serious implications. May Jupiter's light shine on us, Narasimha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.