Interpreting Vimsottari Dasa upto Six Levels (to Nemani)

[Guest guest]

Dear Raghunatha(dha),

 

Make sure you are using Lahiri ayanamsa and 360 degree years. Make sure you are

starting dasas from Moon.

 

Finally, I mentioned that I have subtracted 1 day 4 hr 17 min from all the

period start dates/times. See the original article for the reason:

 

vedic astrology/message/35393

 

In addition, the time of the event is 9:30 pm and not 9:30 am, on 1st August

1993. You can use "locate an event" menu in the dasa window. Just enter August

1, 2003, 21:30 and locate the event upto deha-antardasa.

 

Actually, when I don't use 1-4-17 correction, your calculations seem to match

what I am getting on my PC here. Unfortunately, the correction feature is not

in your version. So, you have to do it mentally.

 

When you come to example 2, please note that I was in EDT timezone at the time

of the event and the time of the layoff was 16:15 on 12th Aug 2002. So, you

have to take the timezone difference into consideration. The latest JHora

allows you to change the timezone and display all calculations using a timezone

different from the timezone of birth. This spares you of manual conversion of

timezone when finding the deha-antardasa of the event.

 

May Jupiter's light shine on us,

Narasimha

 

> Hare Rama Krishna,> > Namaste Narasimha Ji,> > I am very thankful for the

wonderful method you have taught> us by giving few examples in your lesson. I

have also applied> this method on few charts with few events known to me and it

> works beautifully. Ofcouse the birth time accuracy was an> important factor

and the rectification was done prior to this> exercise.> > But I am having a

trouble of re-producing your example-1 > using my JH 5 commercial version for

your chart and I am > gettinga different start time for your MD till DAD. > >

Can you please tell me what I could be doing wrong and why > I am not able to

generate which should match to the dasa > sequence's which you have given in

your example-1.> > I am getting the following dasa sequence for the date > "1st

Aug 1993" by using the following (your) birth data:->

===================================================> April 4,

1970> Time: 17:47:13> Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT)> Place:

81 E 08' 00", 16 N 10' 00"> ====> Vimsottari Dasa (started from Moon):> >

Sat MD: 1975-12-30 (12:21:49) - 1994-12-30 (9:13:12)> Jup AD: 1992-06-17

(8:31:33) - 1994-12-30 (9:13:12)> Ket PD: 1993-07-24 (12:16:23) - 1993-09-17

(17:06:03)> Ven SD: 1993-07-27 (18:13:46) - 1993-08-06 (0:43:16)> Rah

PAD: 1993-07-31 (2:00:20) - 1993-08-01 (11:23:13)> > Deha-antardasas in

this PAD:> > Rah: 1993-07-31 (2:00:20) - 1993-07-31 (7:00:51)> Jup:

1993-07-31 (7:00:51) - 1993-07-31 (11:27:54)> Sat: 1993-07-31 (11:27:54) -

1993-07-31 (16:45:01)> Merc: 1993-07-31 (16:45:01) - 1993-07-31

(21:28:45)> Ket: 1993-07-31 (21:28:45) - 1993-07-31 (23:25:34)>

Ven: 1993-07-31 (23:25:34) - 1993-08-01 (4:59:20)> Sun: 1993-08-01

(4:59:20) - 1993-08-01 (6:39:31)> ==> Moon: 1993-08-01 (6:39:31) - 1993-08-01

(9:26:24)> Mars: 1993-08-01 (9:26:24) - 1993-08-01 (11:23:13)> > Thanks

for your help in advance.> > Regards> Raghunadha Rao

[Guest guest]

Hare Rama Krishna,

 

Namaste Narasimha Ji,

 

Thanks for the clarification and it matches to mine too,as

This time I have done a manual 1-4-7 subtract and it took

a long time for me. Yes, the spelling in my name is "dha"

and you are correct.

 

Actually, your example-1 was perfectly matching with

Kalachakra Dasa method also. For some reasons, I am not

able to concentrate on your example-2 using KalaChakra Dasa

System. If you have few minutes, can you please pinpoint

the event of example-2 using KCD system for my/our education.

 

Also, if you don't mind, when do you think the new

version avaialble for us.

 

Regards

Raghunadha Rao

 

 

vedic astrology, "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao"

<pvr@c...> wrote:

> Dear Raghunatha(dha),

>

> Make sure you are using Lahiri ayanamsa and 360 degree years. Make

sure you are starting dasas from Moon.

>

> Finally, I mentioned that I have subtracted 1 day 4 hr 17 min from

all the period start dates/times. See the original article for the

reason:

>

> vedic astrology/message/35393

>

> In addition, the time of the event is 9:30 pm and not 9:30 am, on

1st August 1993. You can use "locate an event" menu in the dasa

window. Just enter August 1, 2003, 21:30 and locate the event upto

deha-antardasa.

>

> Actually, when I don't use 1-4-17 correction, your calculations

seem to match what I am getting on my PC here. Unfortunately, the

correction feature is not in your version. So, you have to do it

mentally.

>

> When you come to example 2, please note that I was in EDT timezone

at the time of the event and the time of the layoff was 16:15 on 12th

Aug 2002. So, you have to take the timezone difference into

consideration. The latest JHora allows you to change the timezone and

display all calculations using a timezone different from the timezone

of birth. This spares you of manual conversion of timezone when

finding the deha-antardasa of the event.

>

> May Jupiter's light shine on us,

> Narasimha

>

> > Hare Rama Krishna,

> >

> > Namaste Narasimha Ji,

> >

> > I am very thankful for the wonderful method you have taught

> > us by giving few examples in your lesson. I have also applied

> > this method on few charts with few events known to me and it

> > works beautifully. Ofcouse the birth time accuracy was an

> > important factor and the rectification was done prior to this

> > exercise.

> >

> > But I am having a trouble of re-producing your example-1

> > using my JH 5 commercial version for your chart and I am

> > gettinga different start time for your MD till DAD.

> >

> > Can you please tell me what I could be doing wrong and why

> > I am not able to generate which should match to the dasa

> > sequence's which you have given in your example-1.

> >

> > I am getting the following dasa sequence for the date

> > "1st Aug 1993" by using the following (your) birth data:-

> > ===================================================

> > April 4, 1970

> > Time: 17:47:13

> > Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT)

> > Place: 81 E 08' 00", 16 N 10' 00"

> > ====

> > Vimsottari Dasa (started from Moon):

> >

> > Sat MD: 1975-12-30 (12:21:49) - 1994-12-30 (9:13:12)

> > Jup AD: 1992-06-17 (8:31:33) - 1994-12-30 (9:13:12)

> > Ket PD: 1993-07-24 (12:16:23) - 1993-09-17 (17:06:03)

> > Ven SD: 1993-07-27 (18:13:46) - 1993-08-06 (0:43:16)

> > Rah PAD: 1993-07-31 (2:00:20) - 1993-08-01 (11:23:13)

> >

> > Deha-antardasas in this PAD:

> >

> > Rah: 1993-07-31 (2:00:20) - 1993-07-31 (7:00:51)

> > Jup: 1993-07-31 (7:00:51) - 1993-07-31 (11:27:54)

> > Sat: 1993-07-31 (11:27:54) - 1993-07-31 (16:45:01)

> > Merc: 1993-07-31 (16:45:01) - 1993-07-31 (21:28:45)

> > Ket: 1993-07-31 (21:28:45) - 1993-07-31 (23:25:34)

> > Ven: 1993-07-31 (23:25:34) - 1993-08-01 (4:59:20)

> > Sun: 1993-08-01 (4:59:20) - 1993-08-01 (6:39:31)

> > ==> Moon: 1993-08-01 (6:39:31) - 1993-08-01 (9:26:24)

> > Mars: 1993-08-01 (9:26:24) - 1993-08-01 (11:23:13)

> >

> > Thanks for your help in advance.

> >

> > Regards

> > Raghunadha Rao

[Guest guest]

Hare Rama Krishna,

 

Namaste Narasimha Ji,

 

I am sorry, I should have included this question with my

earlier mail, but I continued working on your example after

I have sent that message, hence a another question for you.

 

I have noticed that, you are using Sunrise Definition Option-1

in your both examples, is it by purpose or by an accident.

The reason for this is: with the option-1 you will get for the

first example PPL is Aq, which have mentioned in your original

message. If you have taken Option-2 then the PPL should have

been Pi and in the option-3 it will be Ge.

 

Please clarify and educate me/us.

 

Regards

Raghunadha Rao

 

 

vedic astrology, "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao"

<pvr@c...> wrote:

> Dear Raghunatha(dha),

>

> Make sure you are using Lahiri ayanamsa and 360 degree years. Make

sure you are starting dasas from Moon.

>

> Finally, I mentioned that I have subtracted 1 day 4 hr 17 min from

all the period start dates/times. See the original article for the

reason:

>

> vedic astrology/message/35393

>

> In addition, the time of the event is 9:30 pm and not 9:30 am, on

1st August 1993. You can use "locate an event" menu in the dasa

window. Just enter August 1, 2003, 21:30 and locate the event upto

deha-antardasa.

>

> Actually, when I don't use 1-4-17 correction, your calculations

seem to match what I am getting on my PC here. Unfortunately, the

correction feature is not in your version. So, you have to do it

mentally.

>

> When you come to example 2, please note that I was in EDT timezone

at the time of the event and the time of the layoff was 16:15 on 12th

Aug 2002. So, you have to take the timezone difference into

consideration. The latest JHora allows you to change the timezone and

display all calculations using a timezone different from the timezone

of birth. This spares you of manual conversion of timezone when

finding the deha-antardasa of the event.

>

> May Jupiter's light shine on us,

> Narasimha

>

> > Hare Rama Krishna,

> >

> > Namaste Narasimha Ji,

> >

> > I am very thankful for the wonderful method you have taught

> > us by giving few examples in your lesson. I have also applied

> > this method on few charts with few events known to me and it

> > works beautifully. Ofcouse the birth time accuracy was an

> > important factor and the rectification was done prior to this

> > exercise.

> >

> > But I am having a trouble of re-producing your example-1

> > using my JH 5 commercial version for your chart and I am

> > gettinga different start time for your MD till DAD.

> >

> > Can you please tell me what I could be doing wrong and why

> > I am not able to generate which should match to the dasa

> > sequence's which you have given in your example-1.

> >

> > I am getting the following dasa sequence for the date

> > "1st Aug 1993" by using the following (your) birth data:-

> > ===================================================

> > April 4, 1970

> > Time: 17:47:13

> > Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT)

> > Place: 81 E 08' 00", 16 N 10' 00"

> > ====

> > Vimsottari Dasa (started from Moon):

> >

> > Sat MD: 1975-12-30 (12:21:49) - 1994-12-30 (9:13:12)

> > Jup AD: 1992-06-17 (8:31:33) - 1994-12-30 (9:13:12)

> > Ket PD: 1993-07-24 (12:16:23) - 1993-09-17 (17:06:03)

> > Ven SD: 1993-07-27 (18:13:46) - 1993-08-06 (0:43:16)

> > Rah PAD: 1993-07-31 (2:00:20) - 1993-08-01 (11:23:13)

> >

> > Deha-antardasas in this PAD:

> >

> > Rah: 1993-07-31 (2:00:20) - 1993-07-31 (7:00:51)

> > Jup: 1993-07-31 (7:00:51) - 1993-07-31 (11:27:54)

> > Sat: 1993-07-31 (11:27:54) - 1993-07-31 (16:45:01)

> > Merc: 1993-07-31 (16:45:01) - 1993-07-31 (21:28:45)

> > Ket: 1993-07-31 (21:28:45) - 1993-07-31 (23:25:34)

> > Ven: 1993-07-31 (23:25:34) - 1993-08-01 (4:59:20)

> > Sun: 1993-08-01 (4:59:20) - 1993-08-01 (6:39:31)

> > ==> Moon: 1993-08-01 (6:39:31) - 1993-08-01 (9:26:24)

> > Mars: 1993-08-01 (9:26:24) - 1993-08-01 (11:23:13)

> >

> > Thanks for your help in advance.

> >

> > Regards

> > Raghunadha Rao

[Guest guest]

Namaste Raghunadha, It is a common corruption among us, Telugu people, to change

tha to dha. Tha and dha look similar in Telugu script, except for a small dot -

which is easy to miss - and that might've been the root cause for this common

corruption. Raghunatha is the correct Sanskrit form. I will leave your question

on Kalachakra dasa. Let us concentrate on Vimsottari dasa and Narayana dasa

first. However, please note that Kalachakra dasa dates change accordingly, if

Moon's longitude is slightly rectified. When we rectify Vimsottari dasa dates

by 1d-4h-17m, that implies a certain rectification in Moon's longitude. That,

in turn, implies a bigger change in Kalachakra dasa dates. Let us concentrate

on Vimsottari dasa for now. Regarding the sunrise definition setting, it is

controversial. Different scholars have different views and I am not at all

ready for a public debate on this. However, this is one of the things on which

I worked during the last one year (apart from dasa years) and have satisfied

myself. But, satisfying others is different and I will not attempt it now.

 

Yes, your observation is correct. I was hoping to get away without having to

answer this point. Nobody asked me at the class and so I chose to leave this

vague!

 

Those who want to replicate the calculations given by me in the article (and in

the class) should use sunrise option 1 of JHora (i.e. true rise of the center

of Sun's disk). Suffice to say that this was by "purpose" and not by

"accident". May Jupiter's light shine on us,Narasimha > Hare Rama Krishna,> >

Namaste Narasimha Ji,> > I am sorry, I should have included this question with

my> earlier mail, but I continued working on your example after> I have sent

that message, hence a another question for you.> > I have noticed that, you are

using Sunrise Definition Option-1> in your both examples, is it by purpose or by

an accident.> The reason for this is: with the option-1 you will get for the>

first example PPL is Aq, which have mentioned in your original> message. If

you have taken Option-2 then the PPL should have> been Pi and in the option-3

it will be Ge.> > Please clarify and educate me/us.> > Regards> Raghunadha Rao

[Guest guest]

Hare Rama Krishna

 

Namaste Narasimha Ji,

 

Thanks for the clarification and comments on sunrise

definitions and I will not ask any more questions on that,

as I understand now.

 

I will lookforward for the newer version of JH S/W as it

has got lot of good stuff.

 

I could not resist myself not to write the following

observation I have made. This time I took your example-2

event and applied the D-10 Narayana Dasa and KCD and amazed

to see the dasa's are almost idential, ofcourse dates and

times are different and I understand that. But can you

please tell me is this a co-insidence or any other reasons

for this.

 

Thanks for helping me and consider me as a student with lots

of questions and interest to learn.

 

Regards

Raghunadha Rao

 

=======Observation

Event : (2) The native lost his job on 12th August 2002 at 4:15 pm

(EDT).

 

Narayana Dasa of D-10 chart (a versatile phalita rasi dasa):

 

Ge MD: 1999-04-05 (4:15:02) - 2010-04-04 (23:56:46)

Li AD: 2002-01-05 (12:19:59) - 2002-12-07 (7:08:11)

Cp PD: 2002-07-20 (8:47:10) - 2002-08-18 (2:04:50)

Ge SD: 2002-08-10 (22:17:58) - 2002-08-13 (7:35:54)

Ta PAD: 2002-08-12 (12:30:10) - 2002-08-12 (17:16:36)

 

Deha-antardasas in this PAD:

 

Ge: 2002-08-12 (12:30:10) - 2002-08-12 (12:54:02)

Cn: 2002-08-12 (12:54:02) - 2002-08-12 (13:17:54)

Le: 2002-08-12 (13:17:54) - 2002-08-12 (13:41:46)

Vi: 2002-08-12 (13:41:46) - 2002-08-12 (14:05:39)

Li: 2002-08-12 (14:05:39) - 2002-08-12 (14:29:31)

Sc: 2002-08-12 (14:29:31) - 2002-08-12 (14:53:23)

Sg: 2002-08-12 (14:53:23) - 2002-08-12 (15:17:15)

Cp: 2002-08-12 (15:17:15) - 2002-08-12 (15:41:07)

Aq: 2002-08-12 (15:41:07) - 2002-08-12 (16:05:00)

>> Pi: 2002-08-12 (16:05:00) - 2002-08-12 (16:28:52)

Ar: 2002-08-12 (16:28:52) - 2002-08-12 (16:52:44)

Ta: 2002-08-12 (16:52:44) - 2002-08-12 (17:16:36)

 

 

 

Kalachakra Dasa (Savya group, Paramayush = 100 years):

 

Ge MD: 1997-03-14 (2:26:32) - 2006-03-14 (9:57:02)

Li AD: 2001-11-13 (2:56:03) - 2003-07-23 (23:21:24)

Cp PD: 2002-07-15 (23:04:45) - 2002-08-15 (16:23:30)

Ge SD: 2002-08-12 (10:37:18) - 2002-08-15 (16:23:30)

Ge PAD: 2002-08-12 (10:37:18) - 2002-08-12 (19:03:27)

 

Deha-antardasas in this PAD:

 

Ge: 2002-08-12 (10:37:18) - 2002-08-12 (11:32:11)

Ta: 2002-08-12 (11:32:11) - 2002-08-12 (13:09:46)

Ar: 2002-08-12 (13:09:46) - 2002-08-12 (13:52:27)

Pi: 2002-08-12 (13:52:27) - 2002-08-12 (14:53:26)

Aq: 2002-08-12 (14:53:26) - 2002-08-12 (15:17:50)

Cp: 2002-08-12 (15:17:50) - 2002-08-12 (15:42:13)

>> Sg: 2002-08-12 (15:42:13) - 2002-08-12 (16:43:12)

Ar: 2002-08-12 (16:43:12) - 2002-08-12 (17:25:53)

Ta: 2002-08-12 (17:25:53) - 2002-08-12 (19:03:27)

 

 

vedic astrology, "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao"

<pvr@c...> wrote:

> Namaste Raghunadha,

>

> It is a common corruption among us, Telugu people, to change tha to

dha. Tha and dha look similar in Telugu script, except for a small

dot - which is easy to miss - and that might've been the root cause

for this common corruption. Raghunatha is the correct Sanskrit form.

>

> I will leave your question on Kalachakra dasa. Let us concentrate

on Vimsottari dasa and Narayana dasa first.

>

> However, please note that Kalachakra dasa dates change accordingly,

if Moon's longitude is slightly rectified. When we rectify Vimsottari

dasa dates by 1d-4h-17m, that implies a certain rectification in

Moon's longitude. That, in turn, implies a bigger change in

Kalachakra dasa dates. Let us concentrate on Vimsottari dasa for now.

>

> Regarding the sunrise definition setting, it is controversial.

Different scholars have different views and I am not at all ready for

a public debate on this. However, this is one of the things on which

I worked during the last one year (apart from dasa years) and have

satisfied myself. But, satisfying others is different and I will not

attempt it now.

>

> Yes, your observation is correct. I was hoping to get away without

having to answer this point. Nobody asked me at the class and so I

chose to leave this vague!

>

> Those who want to replicate the calculations given by me in the

article (and in the class) should use sunrise option 1 of JHora (i.e.

true rise of the center of Sun's disk). Suffice to say that this was

by "purpose" and not by "accident".

>

> May Jupiter's light shine on us,

> Narasimha

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Narasimha Rao,

 

Hare Rama Krsna!

 

Not to get into a discussion about sunrise definition, since you wrote you

don't want this, but isn't it so that your new rectified time falls into a

Navamsa-dvadasamsa lagna which is female? I saw your time of birth is just

a question of seconds regarding pranapada rectification, no matter what

sunrise definition, but it's a second or 3 seconds off from correctness.

 

Perhaps I do not understand the Navamsa-dvadasamsa rectification rightly

yet? Do we count the number of astottaramsa's (108) in the sign and then

count that number from lagna or from 0°Aries? In that case we should also

add the degrees of the previous signs - in your case 150° upto Virgo for 5

signs. Anyhow, the sign arrived at is female, or wait, Cancer is male,

which could be an exception.

 

However, Ramadas Rao wrote in a previous mail to Sarajit about this, which

quote:

> "3) Now as I wrote you early Odd Rasis indicate male births and Even

>Rasis indicate female births.The only exception in this case will be

>Meena Rasi which can also be considered as Male birth only if Kunda and

>Pranapada method rectification is confirmed.

>I hope this helps you.

>With Sashtaanga Namana to Mother Bhuvaneshwari,

>Ramadas Rao.

 

If Cancer would be an exception, then probably Aquarius (in my case) would

be one to give female birth as well. So, please let us find clarity in

this, so that I can make up my mind regarding the sunrise definition, and

rectify my own chart correctly.

 

Thanks!

 

Yours,

Dhira Krsna dasa,

Jyotisha

http://www.radhadesh.com

[Guest guest]

Dear Ramadas Rao,

 

>I am also using another method called Tattwa- Antar Tattwa method which

>gives the results still more accurate.If you are interested in this

>table,I will send it to you.

 

Yes, please, you can send me this method.

 

Yours,

Dhira Krsna dasa,

Jyotisha

http://www.radhadesh.com

[Guest guest]

Namaste Dhira Krsna Prabhu,

 

> Dear Narasimha Rao,> > Hare Rama Krsna!> > Not to get into a discussion about

sunrise definition, since you wrote you> don't want this, but isn't it so that

your new rectified time falls into a> Navamsa-dvadasamsa lagna which is female?

I saw your time of birth is just> a question of seconds regarding pranapada

rectification, no matter what> sunrise definition, but it's a second or 3

seconds off from correctness.

 

But you are talking only about the Pranapada lagna in navamsa. What about

pranapada lagna in other divisions (and GL etc)? They all get messed up. If I

use a different sunrise definition, it is still possible to rectify pranapada

in navamsa, as you say. But I cannot then find a rectified Vimsottari dasa for

me, with which I can explain 20 events from my life (for which I know dates and

time) upto deha-antardasa.

 

My criterion is simple. I want clear-cut explainations for all the 20 events,

upto deha-antardasa. I will not accept round-about explanations. The

explanations have to be consistent and simple. For example, if my PPL

(pranapada lagna) in D-9 is in Aq and Saturn is in Le, it has to be Saturn's

prana-antardasa when I got married. My D-10 has Venus in 10th and it has to be

Venus deha-antardasa when I joined my first job. My D-24 has lagna lord Mercury

in 5th. It has to be Mercury deha-antardasa when it was announced on radio that

I stood state first. In my D-7, 5th lord is Venus in own sign and 7th lord is

Jupiter in own sign. So the deha-antardasas at the time of chiuldbirth have to

be Venus and Jupiter (respectively). In my rasi chart, 9th lord is Venus and he

is in 8th in D-4. So it has to be Venus deha-antardasa both the times when I

left India to go abroad.

 

Like this, I want prana and deha antaradsdas to be simply explainable using PPL

and lagna as the references (as taught in our tradition). I did not want to

settle for round-about explanations. If I do, I can explain any set of dasa,

antardasa, pratyantardasa and so on. But such a pseudo-exercise (which,

unfortunately, many authors engage in these days) serves no purpose. One can

give a few good predictions thru clairvoyance, but such a pseudo-approach does

not advance the cause of astrology being a science.

 

Of course, I was willing to rectify the birthtime and change lagna etc in

divisions. I was willing to use different sunrises and get different PPL and GL

in divisions. I was willing to adjust the dasa dates by a fixed amount (to

compensate for any unknown errors in Moon's longitude). Despite heavy

experimentation with these three variables, I did not find any one set, with

which all the 20 events (and 5 levels - from antardasa to deha-antardasa) make

clear sense, without any intellectual compromise. If I fix the variables to

explain some events, some other events will become tough to explain. (Again, if

I settle for vague logic, nothing is tough to explain. But I was strict.)

 

The only combination I found is what I presented. With this, about 95 of 100

test cases (20x5) make clear sense. Please check the crispness of the logic

presented in the two examples given by me earlier. Please check the crispness

of the logic in other examples (if you can get the CD's). You can see for

yourself what I mean.

> Perhaps I do not understand the Navamsa-dvadasamsa rectification rightly> yet?

Do we count the number of astottaramsa's (108) in the sign and then> count that

number from lagna or from 0°Aries? In that case we should also> add the degrees

of the previous signs - in your case 150° upto Virgo for 5> signs. Anyhow, the

sign arrived at is female, or wait, Cancer is male,> which could be an

exception.

 

Well, its lord Moon is with Mars in Sg. He can show a man. Moreover, I am not at

all sure if we are supposed to use lagna or vighati lagna.

 

In another mai, you wrote:

 

> The correction can also be due to the fact that Narasimha used 360 degrees>

year instead of 365.2425 days per year. I found a difference of a couple> of

days in my chart.

 

Yes, but the difference is not linear. If you use one instead of the other,

dates move backward for some dasas and forward for some. In my case, what I

found is that 20x5 periods (antardasa-to-deha-antardasa for 20 events) line up

perfectly, if I make a linear subtraction from the dates obtained by using 360

deg years.

> So it does not necessarily mean the ayanamsa is not correct.

 

Yes, it does not mean ayanamsa is incorrect. I gave a few other possibilities in

my previous mail. There are so many possibilities.

 

Another possibility is that "120 years" is not accurate and it should "120 years

and 5 days" or something like that. Because most of the events I tested in my

own case were in the range of 30 years of age, this gives an almost fixed error

(which will grow as I grow). This may or may not be the case. It can be

confirmed only if I do an equally thorough rectification of the chart of an old

person.

 

Actually, if any volunteer has 20-30 important events in their life (along with

the exact date and time of the events), I will be interested in a

micro-rectification of the chart.

 

May Jupiter's light shine on us,

Narasimha

[Guest guest]

Namaste Narasimha Prabhu,

 

>But you are talking only about the Pranapada lagna in navamsa

 

Yes, isn't this one of the main criteria for rectification? I may be

wrong, so please don't see this as a challenge, I only want to learn more

from advanced jyotishi like you. It is indeed very wonderful that you have

attained such a result with a fixed correction to Vimsottari dasha. In my

opinion, it could also be a slight incorrectness in the Moon's longitude.

 

>Another possibility is that "120 years" is not accurate and it should

> "120 years and 5 days" or something like that. Because most of the

>events I tested in my own case were in the range of 30 years of age,

 

Due to the preciseness of Vimsottari, I think you should definitely have a

big difference already within the range of 30 years. By the way, if our

year definition is correct, then it should be 120 years, otherwise

Parashara would have mentioned that. I was thinking also about the year

being defined as starting when Sun enters Aries, if we take 360 degrees

year, then do we not overlook the small adjustment due to ayanamsa

changes?

 

>Actually, if any volunteer has 20-30 important events in their life

>(along with the exact date and time of the events), I will be interested

>in a micro-rectification of the chart.

 

If I can be of any help for testing your calculations, I volunteer. I'll

send you 20-30 life events with exact date-time in a private letter. I

suppose better not to post it on the list, unless you like.

 

Yours,

Dhira Krsna dasa,

Jyotisha

http://www.radhadesh.com