Guest guest Posted December 8, 2003 Report Share Posted December 8, 2003 ||Om Brihaspataye Namah|| Dear Jay, Thanks for the cool fresh breath of air! It does raise a feeling of 'its inevitable' when you ponder the question of the transient human population. But still, there are many secrets hidden inside the Maharishis' treatises that we do not understand completely. Anyway, what's your statistical take on how many people will have the same Kashinatha Hora chart and ergo, same financial situation? regards Hari vedic astrology, "J. Weiss" <jayhw@t...> wrote: > Dear all., > > It's always nice to blow some fresh air, isn't it ? > Go to http://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/ipc/popclockw and check the current status of world population. > Look at your watch, back off to previous page and after 10 seconds enter the page again. > You'll be surprise to see how many NEW BIRTH CHARTS are generate in our world each second of the day... > > Please keep in mind at the back of your head the following question: > How many people were living in the ENTIRE world during the periods of Parasara and Jaimini (and the other ancient writers) ? > Does this HUGE difference raise a question or two ? > If you wonder what "huge" means than the estimated population 3000 years ago was (in the entire world) around 50 million and 27 million 4000 years ago and only 14 millions 5000 years ago. > Is the red lamp "On" by now ?. > For every human being 3000 years ago there are 127 right now. > > I mail this is intended as "food for the brain". > > Kind regards > /Jay Weiss > http://www.alvicomm.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2003 Report Share Posted December 8, 2003 Dear Hari, Your wrote: "Anyway, what's your statistical take on how many people will have the same Kashinatha Hora chart and ergo, same financial situation?" One of the many points in question: Statistically it is very easy to come up with a figure, BUT it will NEVER stand a chance in reality as the social bases are missing (birth in already over populated and poorer societies which make the majority of world population today). Are all owners of 'good' Kashinatha Hora charts well off ? - I don't think so. It brings back the classical question of "why is it that a new baby is born 'here' and not 'there'... This is definitely an area for serious research as no true answer is possible (my opinion). Kind regards /Jay Weiss http://www.alvicomm.com - "onlyhari" <onlyhari <vedic astrology> Tuesday, December 09, 2003 2:56 AM [vedic astrology] Re: How many new charts per second ? > ||Om Brihaspataye Namah|| > > Dear Jay, > > Thanks for the cool fresh breath of air! It does raise a feeling > of 'its inevitable' when you ponder the question of the transient > human population. But still, there are many secrets hidden inside > the Maharishis' treatises that we do not understand completely. > > Anyway, what's your statistical take on how many people will have > the same Kashinatha Hora chart and ergo, same financial situation? > > regards > Hari > > vedic astrology, "J. Weiss" <jayhw@t...> > wrote: > > Dear all., > > > > It's always nice to blow some fresh air, isn't it ? > > Go to http://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/ipc/popclockw and check the > current status of world population. > > Look at your watch, back off to previous page and after 10 seconds > enter the page again. > > You'll be surprise to see how many NEW BIRTH CHARTS are generate > in our world each second of the day... > > > > Please keep in mind at the back of your head the following > question: > > How many people were living in the ENTIRE world during the periods > of Parasara and Jaimini (and the other ancient writers) ? > > Does this HUGE difference raise a question or two ? > > If you wonder what "huge" means than the estimated population 3000 > years ago was (in the entire world) around 50 million and 27 million > 4000 years ago and only 14 millions 5000 years ago. > > Is the red lamp "On" by now ?. > > For every human being 3000 years ago there are 127 right now. > > > > I mail this is intended as "food for the brain". > > > > Kind regards > > /Jay Weiss > > http://www.alvicomm.com > > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > Your use of is subject to > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2003 Report Share Posted December 8, 2003 ||Om Brihaspataye Namah|| Dear Jay, > It brings back the classical question of "why is it that a new > baby is born 'here' and not 'there'... > This is definitely an area for serious research as no true answer >is possible (my opinion). I notice that this question is a recurring theme in most of your emails, :-). Part of the answer to the question is provided by the theory of karma; the baby would have links with the parents or siblings at some time in the past. The other part of the question viz., "why here and not there" is really a tactical-level decision and the authority for that decision resides in God or whoever is responsible for that in one of the lokas other than the one we're born on, :-) Since Jyotish is Bhu-centric, its impossible to define a parameter/principle that shows clearly the relationship between the instant of human birth and the place of birth. Whats your opinion? regards Hari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2003 Report Share Posted December 9, 2003 Hi Jay Weiss, This is the age of Kaliyuga according to Hindu scriptures so there will be lot of human births and all have to go thru cycle of karma....This cycle has to go on !!!Mind you we are still in middle of Kaliyuga... I dont know how it will be at the fag end of Kali Age !! bye Abhijeet vedic astrology, "J. Weiss" <jayhw@t...> wrote: > Dear Hari, > > Your wrote: "Anyway, what's your statistical take on how many people will > have > the same Kashinatha Hora chart and ergo, same financial situation?" > > One of the many points in question: > Statistically it is very easy to come up with a figure, BUT it will NEVER > stand a chance in reality as the social bases are missing (birth in already > over populated and poorer societies which make the majority of world > population today). > Are all owners of 'good' Kashinatha Hora charts well off ? - I don't think > so. > > It brings back the classical question of "why is it that a new baby is born > 'here' and not 'there'... > This is definitely an area for serious research as no true answer is > possible (my opinion). > > Kind regards > /Jay Weiss > http://www.alvicomm.com > > > > - > "onlyhari" <onlyhari> > <vedic astrology> > Tuesday, December 09, 2003 2:56 AM > [vedic astrology] Re: How many new charts per second ? > > > > ||Om Brihaspataye Namah|| > > > > Dear Jay, > > > > Thanks for the cool fresh breath of air! It does raise a feeling > > of 'its inevitable' when you ponder the question of the transient > > human population. But still, there are many secrets hidden inside > > the Maharishis' treatises that we do not understand completely. > > > > Anyway, what's your statistical take on how many people will have > > the same Kashinatha Hora chart and ergo, same financial situation? > > > > regards > > Hari > > > > vedic astrology, "J. Weiss" <jayhw@t...> > > wrote: > > > Dear all., > > > > > > It's always nice to blow some fresh air, isn't it ? > > > Go to http://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/ipc/popclockw and check the > > current status of world population. > > > Look at your watch, back off to previous page and after 10 seconds > > enter the page again. > > > You'll be surprise to see how many NEW BIRTH CHARTS are generate > > in our world each second of the day... > > > > > > Please keep in mind at the back of your head the following > > question: > > > How many people were living in the ENTIRE world during the periods > > of Parasara and Jaimini (and the other ancient writers) ? > > > Does this HUGE difference raise a question or two ? > > > If you wonder what "huge" means than the estimated population 3000 > > years ago was (in the entire world) around 50 million and 27 million > > 4000 years ago and only 14 millions 5000 years ago. > > > Is the red lamp "On" by now ?. > > > For every human being 3000 years ago there are 127 right now. > > > > > > I mail this is intended as "food for the brain". > > > > > > Kind regards > > > /Jay Weiss > > > http://www.alvicomm.com > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- astrology/info.html > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > Your use of is subject to > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.