Functional and natural nature

[Guest guest]

Hi,

 

I am still confused about the functional and natural nature

of planets. If the only thing we needed to consider was the functional

nature then there would be no need to define the natural benefics!

 

So my questions are:

 

1) What nature is used to indicate whether a planet will do good

to the house it owns? I believe that a strong planet will always

protect its own significators and the significatiors of the house

it rules. This is irrespective of its nature. Is this true?

 

2) What nature is to be considered when we see the placement of a

planet in a house?

 

3) What nature is consdered when we talk about the aspects of planets?

 

4) What nature is considered when we talk about yogas formed?

 

5) What nature is considered when we talk about dasha/mahadasha?

 

6) In the dasha of FM/FB what happens? In the dasha of FB/FM

what happens?

 

7) Is a strong FM less bad or more bad?

 

8) Is a vargottama FM less bad/more bad?

 

9) If a FM but natural benefic forms a benefic yoga then does

it give good effects?

 

 

Please provide me detailed answers to these. I am confused.

 

Kanwar