News Article:'Lord Ram was born in 5114 BC' to Monmuk

[Guest guest]

Mukund,

What you ask is already known. The theory, as Siva seems to agree,

is that we evolved from apes in the rift valleys of Africa

approximately 5 million years ago. At that time, Africa was fully and

densely forested and suited to tree dwelling apes. Natural calamities

forced sudden changes in one side of Africa which resulted in

a "savannah" kind of habitat - grassland interspersed with trees.

That forced the apes on that side to start having to stand up and

walk from tree to tree somehow resulting in major brain development.

The genetic adaptation to meet this kind of need resulted in the

branching out of the walking apes - the forefathers of humans. They

evolved to the current state over a period of a few million years. So

Homo Sapiens has originated from Africa. There is no evidence of this

having happened anywhere else. Also, this theory is not based on one

or 2 fossils - there are scores of fossils available showing

continuous skeletal change from 2-3 million period until Homo Sapiens.

 

Subsequently (post 1 million years ago) I believe there is a bit of

haze. How exactly migration paths were followed out of Africa is not

fully known. However, Asia (specifically China), and Europe and even

Australia (Aboriginal populations) all have evidence of humans in the

20-40,000 year ago period. The Americas have evidence of dwelling

from the past 12,000 years - by Asian immigrants - the forefathers of

the native Americans. Columbus brought Europeans only 500 years back.

I am unsure exactly what is the case in India though, but I do

remember meeting one very educated Andhra person (forget his name -

last name was Reddy but that isnt narrowing it down very much) many

years ago who actually took me to somewhere in the hills and plains

surrounding Hyderabad and unearthed a couple of stone age tools for

me (he was an expert at many sciences). That would put dwellings in

India in the 20,000 year ago period too..

 

 

Sundeep

 

 

vedic astrology, "monmuk111" <monmuk111>

wrote:

> Hello Siva:

>

> Ya, I really hope someday someone will take interest in

India/Indians

> and figure out for sure whether we all evolved in the sub-continent

> of India or if we migrated to India from somewhere else.

>

> OR was there an indigenious population and a large scale migration

> from Europe that mixed with the indigenious people to produce the

> present day Indians OR the Europeans who migrated to India grew

> darker skins and eyes due to the extreme heat and sunlight--but

this

> is an evolutionary phenomena and takes millions of years.

>

> My gut feeling is that the Indian civilization is app. 5,000 years

> old, a period in which both Ramayana and Mahabharat happened. And,

> the lineage of Kings/Rulers (Chandragupta) who built Mohan-jo-daro

> and Harrapa descended from the Kings at the time of Mahabharat.

>

> Had the Indian civilization been millions and millions of years

old,

> we definitely would have found some remains of that civilization.

> Only dinasour remains date back to millions of years.

>

> The earliest artifacts found by the archeologist date back only to

a

> FEW THOUSAND YEARS.

>

> Mukund

>

> vedic astrology, "schinnas" <schinnas>

> wrote:

> > Hello Mukund,

> > Difference in color could have been due to evolutionary factors

> as

> > a result of south's geographic proximity to the equator.

> >

> > Current evolutionary theory says that white skinned Europeans

> > evolved from black skinned African forefathers. Genetically, from

> > what I was told, skin color is one of the easyest possible

> > evolutionary change. Many factors such as ice age, etc., could

have

> > been a reason for it. When talking about human origins, if we use

> > current day skin color as a valid argument to determine human

> > origins thousands/hundreds of thousands of year ago, we have a

good

> > chance of going wrong.

> >

> > Reg. sincere research, unfortunately, no sincere fundamental

> > research on any field is done in India on a large scale. There

are

> a

> > few good souls that do sincre research, but it is mostly

individual

> > effort and an isolated event rather than a nationwide phenomenon.

> > Hopefully things will change in the near future.

> >

> > warm regards,

> > -Siva.

> >

> > vedic astrology, "monmuk111"

> <monmuk111>

> > wrote:

> > > Hello Siva:

> > >

> > > The saddest part of Indian history and heritage is that to this

> > day

> > > we/I don't know the evolution of human beings in the sub-

> continent

> > of

> > > India.

> > >

> > > We Indians don't look like the Mongloid cultures/nations

> > surrounding

> > > us so we couldn't have evolved from the Mongloid race.

> > >

> > > We Indians look a lot like the European Cocassoids, but there

are

> > two

> > > oceans and one big desert between India and Europe to the West

> and

> > > the mountain ranges of Himalayas to the North so the humans

> > couldn't

> > > have moved to India either from Western Europe or from Russia

> > > (Eastern Europe) due to natural barriers.

> > >

> > > Well, then the only possible explanation is that there

> > could/should

> > > have been a land bridge between India and Western Europe in the

> > pre-

> > > hitoric times and humans may have moved over this land bridge

> from

> > > Europe to India.

> > >

> > > Also, our Hindu scriptures consistently refer to the term

> > Arya/Arya-

> > > putra, Arya-putri. Well, who were these Aryans? Were they

> > indeginious

> > > people or immigrants to India?

> > >

> > > Moreover, the further North we go in India (Punjab, Rajesthan,

> > > Kashmir) we see extremely fair and light-eyed people (most look

> > like

> > > Europeans). The further South we go (all the way to Sri Lanka),

> > > people are darker and their eyes are darker, why is there such

a

> > > disparity in skin and eye colour in the same nation/land mass?

> > >

> > > -- Does this mean that there was an indegnious population in

> India

> > > and then there was a large scale immigration to India from

> > somewhere

> > > else and the two groups mixed to give us the present day

Indians?

> > >

> > > Siva, a lot of questions about India are still unanswered? God

> > only

> > > knows when someone will conduct a sincere research on origins

of

> > > humans in India.

> > >

> > > Mukund

> > >