Guest guest Posted January 11, 2004 Report Share Posted January 11, 2004 Hare Rama Krishna Namaste Dhira Ji, I think the birth must have taken place on Dec 21, 2003. Honestly, I was having a difficulty in following some principles I have learnt from Birhat Jataka, hence I would not go forward and wait for your reply with the procedure to fix the birth time of this child. Also please confirm, whether the child is a male child as I have mentioned in my analysis. Thanks for helping me advance. Regards Raghunadha Rao vedic astrology, Rao Nemani <raon1008> wrote: > Hare Rama Krishna > > Namaste Dhira Ji, Guru's and Learned Members, > > Part-I:- > ===== > > Let me attempt to study the Adhana Lagna chart you have posted as a quiz and write my thoughts on this chart. I want to go for a very detailed study on this chart so please read this initial analysis and write to me whether I am on the right track or not, if not then please suggest me where I am off with some references, so that I can study more and write again. > > The first thing I would see is that, the Adhana Langa which is Sc with Ketu, who is also Lagna co-lord. Sun is aspecting Adhana Lagna so the pregnecy is protected. Moon is aspecting from the the 5th from Adhana lagna from Vi, so this promotes the conception and the pregnancy is successful. Hence I am going forward with my analysis. > > Here Lagna is being aspected by Sun, Me and Ra so this is not indicating a smooth pregnancy. At the same time, Jupiter's aspect from Cancer will protect and will give a smooth pregnecy too. > > Now you will notice here that, the strongest between 7th and 11th is 7th and Rahu is placed in it and aspecting the Adhana Lagna, so this may cause some deformation of the mouth area to the child. But again Jupiter's aspect from Cancer will protect and may nullify this too. > > The sex of the child is seen from the 7th house from the Adhana Lagna and here it is Ta and Rahu (a male planet) is placed in it hence a male child is predicted. > > Part-II:- > ======= > The birth takes place in the tenth month under normal conditions, when that sign is occupied by the Moon. > > In this chart the Adhana Lagna is Sc and Moon is palced in Vi. In Dasamsa it is also the D-10 Lagna. So the birth of the child is predicted in the 10th month, when the moon moves in Vi, the Dwadasamsa occupied by the moon at the time of conception. > > It means that when the Moon moves in the constellations of U Phalguni ( last 3 quarters), Hasta ( four quarters) and Chitra ( first two quarters) birth should take place. And coming to the date of the birth of the child is seen from the Ar to Vi is 6 days, so the child should have been born on 6th day of the 10th Month with the above constellation. > > Please let me know how accurate I am in applying principles. > > Regards > Raghunadha Rao > > --------- original message ----- > VA : Message 37209 > "Dhira Krsna BCS" <Dhira.Krsna.BCS@p...> > Sun Jan 4, 2004 9:40 am > New Year Quiz > Hare Rama Krsna! > Dear Jyotishi, > Happy newyear! I thought it nice to put a Quiz for our new year of jyotish > studies. The chart under consideration is the chart of an adhana lagna > (coitus for conception). > The doctors had predicted the birth for January 8th. Needless to say they were wrong. So the question is: find the correct date (and time) of birth. > The birth took place on the coordinates of 16E18, 50N45. Also, if there is anything striking about the birth you might see, please also mention that. > By the way, the correct date was predicted by me months ago. > Yours, > Dhira Krsna dasa, > Jyotishi > http://www.radhadesh.com > April 15, 2003 > Time: 23:54:27 > Time Zone: 2:00:00 (East of GMT) > Place: 5 E 25' 00", 50 N 21' 00" > Septon, Belgium > Altitude: 300.00 meters > > > > > > > Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2004 Report Share Posted January 15, 2004 ||Om Brihaspataye Namah|| Dear Raghunada, In the light of what Dhira Krishna wrote, I went back and checked your calculations. I am puzzled as to how you arrived at Dec 21? You mention that birth took place in the 10th month ie., from Jan 15 to Feb 14! Hence if you add 6 days, you should have arrived at Jan 21 and not Dec 21!! Secondly, why did you count from Ar? If Moon is in dwadasamsa of Ar, then conception Moon in Vi has gained 8 dwadasamsas or 8 days!!! Lastly, what is relevance of D-10 to conception chart? If Virgo happens to be, for example, D-12 lagna is it correct to say that birth takes place in 12th month? regards Hari vedic astrology, "Rao Nemani" <raon1008> wrote: > Hare Rama Krishna > > Namaste Dhira Ji, > > I think the birth must have taken place on Dec 21, 2003. > > > Part-II:- > > ======= > > The birth takes place in the tenth month under normal conditions, > when that sign is occupied by the Moon. > > > > In this chart the Adhana Lagna is Sc and Moon is palced in Vi. In > Dasamsa it is also the D-10 Lagna. So the birth of the child is > predicted in the 10th month, when the moon moves in Vi, the > Dwadasamsa occupied by the moon at the time of conception. > > > > It means that when the Moon moves in the constellations of U > Phalguni ( last 3 quarters), Hasta ( four quarters) and Chitra ( > first two quarters) birth should take place. And coming to the date > of the birth of the child is seen from the Ar to Vi is 6 days, so the > child should have been born on 6th day of the 10th Month with the > above constellation. > > > > April 15, 2003 > > Time: 23:54:27 > > Time Zone: 2:00:00 (East of GMT) > > Place: 5 E 25' 00", 50 N 21' 00" > > Septon, Belgium > > Altitude: 300.00 meters Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.