Rising Sign Vs Planet Two parts rule and dasha pravesh chart

[Guest guest]

Dear S. Prabhakaran,

 

Well I was going to say the same(what hari mmentioned below). I

appreciate your explanations yet I am somewhat more confused

now..i.e., what should we conclude when a benefic planet(like waxing

moon) is in Pristodaya sign or when a malefic planet like Shani is in

Shirshodaya sign...who decides the final outcome in such cases..graha

or sign?

 

Or is it like for Vimshottari dasas we consider grahas and for Rasi

dasas we consider signs?

 

Thanks and Regards

RMK

 

 

 

vedic astrology, "onlyhari" <onlyhari>

wrote:

> ||Om Brihaspataye Namah||

>

> Dear SanjayP,

>

> Could you please explain WHY the signs and grahas are classified

> thus? Point me to some article or reference that has dealt with

this

> classification in detail.

>

> regards

> Hari

>

> vedic astrology, sprabhakaran@s... wrote:

> > || Om Gurave Namah ||

> > Dear Rajesh,

> > There are two different concepts

> > 1. Rising nature of signs.

> > Head Rising Signs: Le,Vi,Li,Sc,Aq,Ge

> > Back Rising Signs: Ar,Ta,Cn,Sg,Cp

> > Both Rising Sign: Pi

> > 2. Rising nature of planets.

> > Benefics are head rising. Malefics back rising. Jupiter is

> dual

> > rising. This I think is defined in B.V Raman's Book(Astrology for

> > Beginners?. Also a commentary in Hora Sara (Trans & Commented by

> R.

> > Santhanam)is given as,

> >

> > 'Notes: The risings of Rāśis have already been

> explained in th=

> > e

> > opening Ch.. Now, I give below the details of Grahodaya, or

> risings

> > of Grahas: 1) Sūrya, Rahu, Mangal and Śani rise with

> hind part an=

> > d

> > hence called Prishtodaya Grahas. 2) Candr, Śukr and Budh

rise

> with

> > their heads and hence called Shirshodaya Grahas. 3) Guru rises in

> > both ways and hence Ubhayodaya Grah.'

> >

> > For Narayana Dasa Analysis both these facts needs to be taken.

> >

> > In Pg 77 footnote where you are refering the definition is based

> on

> > Lordship. You will see tha Pt Sanjay Rath has used this even in

> Rajiv

> > Gandhi's Case of analysis of Cancer dasa.

> >

> > The default definition is as per Sign as given in 1. Yes, The

> Foot

> > note is not very clear about the lord ship based reckoning.

> >

> >

> > -Warm Regards

> > S. Prabhakaran

> > Om Tat Sat

> >

> >

> >