Guest guest Posted November 29, 2003 Report Share Posted November 29, 2003 There is no such universally applicable rule that I am aware of. By placement in the same nakshatra pada, they will be in the same house in both the Navamsa as well as Rasi, thus indicating a strong mixture of the planetary forces. This can be sometimes good ... infact, I know of many cases where this turned out well. Best, Krishna > > Dear memebers and respected gurujis, > > I have heard that 2 planets in the same nakshatra pada give bad results. If yes what is the nature of the bad effects, when will it be experienced. > Is this similar to the graha yudha rule whic says that when two planets come very close to each other they get involved in a graha yudha. > If yes then in that case is Moon an exception to the rule that 2 planets in the same nakshatra pada are bad as Moon is exempted from the graha yudha rule ( only non luminaries are considered). > > Hoping to learn from all of you, > > Pranams, > Arun > > > > > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 30, 2003 Report Share Posted November 30, 2003 Thanks for your feedback. I was curious as I found a mention to this in 2 astrology groups I am a part of. You are right in saying that this only means they will be in the same house in the navamsa. So what it could mean is that if there is an undesired combination the same should not be in the same pada of the same nakshatra as that could mean compounded bad effects. But if the combination is good ( as in between benefic planets), the same may be considered good. Anyway good to know that you have seen examples before, so there is some emperical evidence. Regards, Arunquietwolf1972 <quietwolf1972 > wrote: There is no such universally applicable rule that I am aware of. By placement in the same nakshatra pada, they will be in the same house in both the Navamsa as well as Rasi, thus indicating a strong mixture of the planetary forces. This can be sometimes good ... infact, I know of many cases where this turned out well. Best,Krishna> > Dear memebers and respected gurujis,> > I have heard that 2 planets in the same nakshatra pada give bad results. If yes what is the nature of the bad effects, when will it be experienced. > Is this similar to the graha yudha rule whic says that when two planets come very close to each other they get involved in a graha yudha. > If yes then in that case is Moon an exception to the rule that 2 planets in the same nakshatra pada are bad as Moon is exempted from the graha yudha rule ( only non luminaries are considered).> > Hoping to learn from all of you,> > Pranams,> Arun> > > > > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it nowArchives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 30, 2003 Report Share Posted November 30, 2003 Arun, You have to eliminate both graha yuddha and combustion. Also, as you suggest, if both planets involved are highly malefic for that chart, this combination will not do good. However, even if only one of the planets is beneficial, the combination may still yield some good. Here is an example: native born 1:05PM, 78E30, 13N0, Dec 13, 1927, Indian Standard Time. You will observe, Ma and Me conjunct in the same pada in a nakshatra ruled by Saturn in the 9th house. Mercury is a first rate malefic, both due to kendradhipati dosha, as well as being conjunct with so many malefics. Mars on the other hand is a yoga karaka for Pisces ascendant and he is placed in his own house. The Mars period was highly beneficial from a career stand point; on the other hand, he also lost his father (Ma/Ra -- note Rahu's placement in the 7th house from the 9th), who was in his late eighties at that time, due to natural causes. The mercury period occured too early in his life to have much consequence. Best, Krishna > Krishna, > > Thanks for your feedback. I was curious as I found a mention to this in 2 astrology groups I am a part of. You are right in saying that this only means they will be in the same house in the navamsa. So what it could mean is that if there is an undesired combination the same should not be in the same pada of the same nakshatra as that could mean compounded bad effects. But if the combination is good ( as in between benefic planets), the same may be considered good. > Anyway good to know that you have seen examples before, so there is some emperical evidence. > > Regards, > Arun > quietwolf1972 <quietwolf1972> wrote: > > There is no such universally applicable rule that I am aware of. By > placement in the same nakshatra pada, they will be in the same house > in both the Navamsa as well as Rasi, thus indicating a strong mixture > of the planetary forces. This can be sometimes good ... infact, I > know of many cases where this turned out well. > > Best, > > Krishna > > > > > Dear memebers and respected gurujis, > > > > I have heard that 2 planets in the same nakshatra pada give bad > results. If yes what is the nature of the bad effects, when will it > be experienced. > > Is this similar to the graha yudha rule whic says that when two > planets come very close to each other they get involved in a graha > yudha. > > If yes then in that case is Moon an exception to the rule that 2 > planets in the same nakshatra pada are bad as Moon is exempted from > the graha yudha rule ( only non luminaries are considered). > > > > Hoping to learn from all of you, > > > > Pranams, > > Arun > > > > > > > > > > > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now > > > Sponsor > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > Terms of Service. > > > > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 30, 2003 Report Share Posted November 30, 2003 check again... regards prashantquietwolf1972 <quietwolf1972 > wrote: Arun,You have to eliminate both graha yuddha and combustion. Also, as you suggest, if both planets involved are highly malefic for that chart, this combination will not do good. However, even if only one of the planets is beneficial, the combination may still yield some good.Here is an example: native born 1:05PM, 78E30, 13N0, Dec 13, 1927, Indian Standard Time. You will observe, Ma and Me conjunct in the same pada in a nakshatra ruled by Saturn in the 9th house. Mercury is a first rate malefic, both due to kendradhipati dosha, as well as being conjunct with so many malefics. Mars on the other hand is a yoga karaka for Pisces ascendant and he is placed in his own house. The Mars period was highly beneficial from a career stand point; on the other hand, he also lost his father (Ma/Ra -- note Rahu's placement in the 7th house from the 9th), who was in his late eighties at that time, due to natural causes. The mercury period occured too early in his life to have much consequence. Best,Krishna> Krishna,> > Thanks for your feedback. I was curious as I found a mention to this in 2 astrology groups I am a part of. You are right in saying that this only means they will be in the same house in the navamsa. So what it could mean is that if there is an undesired combination the same should not be in the same pada of the same nakshatra as that could mean compounded bad effects. But if the combination is good ( as in between benefic planets), the same may be considered good. > Anyway good to know that you have seen examples before, so there is some emperical evidence.> > Regards,> Arun> quietwolf1972 <quietwolf1972> wrote:> > There is no such universally applicable rule that I am aware of. By > placement in the same nakshatra pada, they will be in the same house > in both the Navamsa as well as Rasi, thus indicating a strong mixture > of the planetary forces. This can be sometimes good ... infact, I > know of many cases where this turned out well. > > Best,> > Krishna> > > > > Dear memebers and respected gurujis,> > > > I have heard that 2 planets in the same nakshatra pada give bad > results. If yes what is the nature of the bad effects, when will it > be experienced. > > Is this similar to the graha yudha rule whic says that when two > planets come very close to each other they get involved in a graha > yudha. > > If yes then in that case is Moon an exception to the rule that 2 > planets in the same nakshatra pada are bad as Moon is exempted from > the graha yudha rule ( only non luminaries are considered).> > > > Hoping to learn from all of you,> > > > Pranams,> > Arun> > > > > > > > > > > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now> > > Sponsor> > Archives: vedic astrology> > Group info: vedic astrology/info.html> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || > > Your use of Groups is subject to the > > > > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it nowArchives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 2003 Report Share Posted December 1, 2003 I am not sure what you are referring to. Best, Krishna > r u sure thy will b in the same house in navmsa? or can b extended to trines? > check again... > regards > prashant > > quietwolf1972 <quietwolf1972> wrote: > Arun, > > You have to eliminate both graha yuddha and combustion. Also, as you > suggest, if both planets involved are highly malefic for that chart, > this combination will not do good. However, even if only one of the > planets is beneficial, the combination may still yield some good. > > Here is an example: native born 1:05PM, 78E30, 13N0, Dec 13, 1927, > Indian Standard Time. You will observe, Ma and Me conjunct in the > same pada in a nakshatra ruled by Saturn in the 9th house. Mercury is > a first rate malefic, both due to kendradhipati dosha, as well as > being conjunct with so many malefics. Mars on the other hand is a > yoga karaka for Pisces ascendant and he is placed in his own house. > The Mars period was highly beneficial from a career stand point; on > the other hand, he also lost his father (Ma/Ra -- note Rahu's > placement in the 7th house from the 9th), who was in his late > eighties at that time, due to natural causes. The mercury period > occured too early in his life to have much consequence. > > Best, > > Krishna > > > > > Krishna, > > > > Thanks for your feedback. I was curious as I found a mention to > this in 2 astrology groups I am a part of. You are right in saying > that this only means they will be in the same house in the navamsa. > So what it could mean is that if there is an undesired combination > the same should not be in the same pada of the same nakshatra as that > could mean compounded bad effects. But if the combination is good ( > as in between benefic planets), the same may be considered good. > > Anyway good to know that you have seen examples before, so there is > some emperical evidence. > > > > Regards, > > Arun > > quietwolf1972 <quietwolf1972> wrote: > > > > There is no such universally applicable rule that I am aware of. By > > placement in the same nakshatra pada, they will be in the same > house > > in both the Navamsa as well as Rasi, thus indicating a strong > mixture > > of the planetary forces. This can be sometimes good ... infact, I > > know of many cases where this turned out well. > > > > Best, > > > > Krishna > > > > > > > > Dear memebers and respected gurujis, > > > > > > I have heard that 2 planets in the same nakshatra pada give bad > > results. If yes what is the nature of the bad effects, when will it > > be experienced. > > > Is this similar to the graha yudha rule whic says that when two > > planets come very close to each other they get involved in a graha > > yudha. > > > If yes then in that case is Moon an exception to the rule that 2 > > planets in the same nakshatra pada are bad as Moon is exempted from > > the graha yudha rule ( only non luminaries are considered). > > > > > > Hoping to learn from all of you, > > > > > > Pranams, > > > Arun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now > > > > > > Sponsor > > > > > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > Terms of > Service. > > > > > > > > > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now > > > Sponsor > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > Terms of Service. > > > > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 2003 Report Share Posted December 1, 2003 Dear Prashant, It is my understanding that a nakshatra pada refers to a 3d 20m sub- part of a nakshatra. Thus, each nakshatra has 4 padas and by definition there cannot be two nakshatras sharing the same pada. There are other uses of the word pada in astrology such as "arudha padas" etc. If you read this thread from the beginning, you will see that the discussion is about nakshatra padas. Hope this is helpful. Best, Krishna > dear krisna, > u said planets in same padas r in the same house in navamsa. > here i remember a theory, all those planets which r in same pada (may b different nakshatras) influence each others karakatwa. why it is so? because they come in trines to each other in navamsa. 1-5-9 trine represents first pada of nakshtras. similarly, 2-6-10 for second pada, 3-7-11 for 3rd, & 4-8-12 for 4th.... > regards > prashant > > quietwolf1972 <quietwolf1972> wrote: > I am not sure what you are referring to. > > Best, > > Krishna > > > r u sure thy will b in the same house in navmsa? or can b extended > to trines? > > check again... > > regards > > prashant > > > > quietwolf1972 <quietwolf1972> wrote: > > Arun, > > > > You have to eliminate both graha yuddha and combustion. Also, as > you > > suggest, if both planets involved are highly malefic for that > chart, > > this combination will not do good. However, even if only one of the > > planets is beneficial, the combination may still yield some good. > > > > Here is an example: native born 1:05PM, 78E30, 13N0, Dec 13, 1927, > > Indian Standard Time. You will observe, Ma and Me conjunct in the > > same pada in a nakshatra ruled by Saturn in the 9th house. Mercury > is > > a first rate malefic, both due to kendradhipati dosha, as well as > > being conjunct with so many malefics. Mars on the other hand is a > > yoga karaka for Pisces ascendant and he is placed in his own house. > > The Mars period was highly beneficial from a career stand point; on > > the other hand, he also lost his father (Ma/Ra -- note Rahu's > > placement in the 7th house from the 9th), who was in his late > > eighties at that time, due to natural causes. The mercury period > > occured too early in his life to have much consequence. > > > > Best, > > > > Krishna > > > > > > > > > Krishna, > > > > > > Thanks for your feedback. I was curious as I found a mention to > > this in 2 astrology groups I am a part of. You are right in saying > > that this only means they will be in the same house in the navamsa. > > So what it could mean is that if there is an undesired combination > > the same should not be in the same pada of the same nakshatra as > that > > could mean compounded bad effects. But if the combination is good ( > > as in between benefic planets), the same may be considered good. > > > Anyway good to know that you have seen examples before, so there > is > > some emperical evidence. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Arun > > > quietwolf1972 <quietwolf1972> wrote: > > > > > > There is no such universally applicable rule that I am aware of. > By > > > placement in the same nakshatra pada, they will be in the same > > house > > > in both the Navamsa as well as Rasi, thus indicating a strong > > mixture > > > of the planetary forces. This can be sometimes good ... infact, I > > > know of many cases where this turned out well. > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Krishna > > > > > > > > > > > Dear memebers and respected gurujis, > > > > > > > > I have heard that 2 planets in the same nakshatra pada give bad > > > results. If yes what is the nature of the bad effects, when will > it > > > be experienced. > > > > Is this similar to the graha yudha rule whic says that when two > > > planets come very close to each other they get involved in a > graha > > > yudha. > > > > If yes then in that case is Moon an exception to the rule that > 2 > > > planets in the same nakshatra pada are bad as Moon is exempted > from > > > the graha yudha rule ( only non luminaries are considered). > > > > > > > > Hoping to learn from all of you, > > > > > > > > Pranams, > > > > Arun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now > > > > > > > > > Sponsor > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- astrology/info.html > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > > > Terms of > > Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now > > > > > > Sponsor > > > > > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > Terms of > Service. > > > > > > > > > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now > > > Sponsor > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > Terms of Service. > > > > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 2003 Report Share Posted December 1, 2003 a nakshtra pada is 3deg 20', each navamsa house is also 3deg20'. a navmsa house represents a nakshtra pada. ist navmsa of aries will repesent 1st nakshatra pada of ashwini. in navmsa chart it will b 1st house. after 3 nakshtras, i.e. rohini's 1st pada will also fall in the same house thta's 1st house. bharani & krittika's ist nakshtra padas will fall in trines 5 &9 respectively . this i m talking abt navmsa chart. plz correct me if i sound to b incorrect regards prashantquietwolf1972 <quietwolf1972 > wrote: Dear Prashant,It is my understanding that a nakshatra pada refers to a 3d 20m sub-part of a nakshatra. Thus, each nakshatra has 4 padas and by definition there cannot be two nakshatras sharing the same pada. There are other uses of the word pada in astrology such as "arudha padas" etc. If you read this thread from the beginning, you will see that the discussion is about nakshatra padas. Hope this is helpful. Best,Krishna> dear krisna,> u said planets in same padas r in the same house in navamsa.> here i remember a theory, all those planets which r in same pada(may b different nakshatras) influence each others karakatwa. why it is so? because they come in trines to each other in navamsa. 1-5-9 trine represents first pada of nakshtras. similarly, 2-6-10 for second pada, 3-7-11 for 3rd, & 4-8-12 for 4th....> regards> prashant> > quietwolf1972 <quietwolf1972> wrote:> I am not sure what you are referring to.> > Best,> > Krishna> > > r u sure thy will b in the same house in navmsa? or can b extended > to trines?> > check again...> > regards> > prashant> > > > quietwolf1972 <quietwolf1972> wrote:> > Arun,> > > > You have to eliminate both graha yuddha and combustion. Also, as > you > > suggest, if both planets involved are highly malefic for that > chart, > > this combination will not do good. However, even if only one of the > > planets is beneficial, the combination may still yield some good.> > > > Here is an example: native born 1:05PM, 78E30, 13N0, Dec 13, 1927, > > Indian Standard Time. You will observe, Ma and Me conjunct in the > > same pada in a nakshatra ruled by Saturn in the 9th house. Mercury > is > > a first rate malefic, both due to kendradhipati dosha, as well as > > being conjunct with so many malefics. Mars on the other hand is a > > yoga karaka for Pisces ascendant and he is placed in his own house. > > The Mars period was highly beneficial from a career stand point; on > > the other hand, he also lost his father (Ma/Ra -- note Rahu's > > placement in the 7th house from the 9th), who was in his late > > eighties at that time, due to natural causes. The mercury period > > occured too early in his life to have much consequence. > > > > Best,> > > > Krishna> > > > > > > > > Krishna,> > > > > > Thanks for your feedback. I was curious as I found a mention to > > this in 2 astrology groups I am a part of. You are right in saying > > that this only means they will be in the same house in the navamsa. > > So what it could mean is that if there is an undesired combination > > the same should not be in the same pada of the same nakshatra as > that > > could mean compounded bad effects. But if the combination is good ( > > as in between benefic planets), the same may be considered good. > > > Anyway good to know that you have seen examples before, so there > is > > some emperical evidence.> > > > > > Regards,> > > Arun> > > quietwolf1972 <quietwolf1972> wrote:> > > > > > There is no such universally applicable rule that I am aware of. > By > > > placement in the same nakshatra pada, they will be in the same > > house > > > in both the Navamsa as well as Rasi, thus indicating a strong > > mixture > > > of the planetary forces. This can be sometimes good ... infact, I > > > know of many cases where this turned out well. > > > > > > Best,> > > > > > Krishna> > > > > > > > > > > Dear memebers and respected gurujis,> > > > > > > > I have heard that 2 planets in the same nakshatra pada give bad > > > results. If yes what is the nature of the bad effects, when will > it > > > be experienced. > > > > Is this similar to the graha yudha rule whic says that when two > > > planets come very close to each other they get involved in a > graha > > > yudha. > > > > If yes then in that case is Moon an exception to the rule that > 2 > > > planets in the same nakshatra pada are bad as Moon is exempted > from > > > the graha yudha rule ( only non luminaries are considered).> > > > > > > > Hoping to learn from all of you,> > > > > > > > Pranams,> > > > Arun> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now> > > > > > > > > Sponsor> > > > > > Archives: vedic astrology> > > > > > Group info: vedic astrology/info.html> > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > > > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || > > > > > > Your use of is subject to the Terms of > > Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now> > > > > > Sponsor> > > > Archives: vedic astrology> > > > Group info: vedic astrology/info.html> > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || > > > > Your use of is subject to the Terms of > Service. > > > > > > > > > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now> > > Sponsor> > Archives: vedic astrology> > Group info: vedic astrology/info.html> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || > > Terms of Service. > > > > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it nowArchives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 2, 2003 Report Share Posted December 2, 2003 Prashant, You are talking about planets which are in trines in the Navamsa chart. I agree that such planets would by definition be in the same pada of two different nakshatras. I am not aware of any rule which connects the karakatwas of two planets placed in trines in the navamsa chart. However, in the original discussion, we were talking about two planets which were in the same pada of the same nakshatra. Best, Krishna > dear krisna, > a nakshtra pada is 3deg 20', each navamsa house is also 3deg20'. a navmsa house represents a nakshtra pada. ist navmsa of aries will repesent 1st nakshatra pada of ashwini. in navmsa chart it will b 1st house. after 3 nakshtras, i.e. rohini's 1st pada will also fall in the same house thta's 1st house. bharani & krittika's ist nakshtra padas will fall in trines 5 &9 respectively . this i m talking abt navmsa chart. > plz correct me if i sound to b incorrect > regards > prashant > > quietwolf1972 <quietwolf1972> wrote: > Dear Prashant, > > It is my understanding that a nakshatra pada refers to a 3d 20m sub- > part of a nakshatra. Thus, each nakshatra has 4 padas and by > definition there cannot be two nakshatras sharing the same pada. > There are other uses of the word pada in astrology such as "arudha > padas" etc. If you read this thread from the beginning, you will see > that the discussion is about nakshatra padas. Hope this is helpful. > > Best, > > Krishna > > > > dear krisna, > > u said planets in same padas r in the same house in navamsa. > > here i remember a theory, all those planets which r in same pada > (may b different nakshatras) influence each others karakatwa. why it > is so? because they come in trines to each other in navamsa. 1-5-9 > trine represents first pada of nakshtras. similarly, 2-6-10 for > second pada, 3-7-11 for 3rd, & 4-8-12 for 4th.... > > regards > > prashant > > > > quietwolf1972 <quietwolf1972> wrote: > > I am not sure what you are referring to. > > > > Best, > > > > Krishna > > > > > r u sure thy will b in the same house in navmsa? or can b > extended > > to trines? > > > check again... > > > regards > > > prashant > > > > > > quietwolf1972 <quietwolf1972> wrote: > > > Arun, > > > > > > You have to eliminate both graha yuddha and combustion. Also, as > > you > > > suggest, if both planets involved are highly malefic for that > > chart, > > > this combination will not do good. However, even if only one of > the > > > planets is beneficial, the combination may still yield some good. > > > > > > Here is an example: native born 1:05PM, 78E30, 13N0, Dec 13, > 1927, > > > Indian Standard Time. You will observe, Ma and Me conjunct in the > > > same pada in a nakshatra ruled by Saturn in the 9th house. > Mercury > > is > > > a first rate malefic, both due to kendradhipati dosha, as well as > > > being conjunct with so many malefics. Mars on the other hand is a > > > yoga karaka for Pisces ascendant and he is placed in his own > house. > > > The Mars period was highly beneficial from a career stand point; > on > > > the other hand, he also lost his father (Ma/Ra -- note Rahu's > > > placement in the 7th house from the 9th), who was in his late > > > eighties at that time, due to natural causes. The mercury period > > > occured too early in his life to have much consequence. > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Krishna > > > > > > > > > > > > > Krishna, > > > > > > > > Thanks for your feedback. I was curious as I found a mention to > > > this in 2 astrology groups I am a part of. You are right in > saying > > > that this only means they will be in the same house in the > navamsa. > > > So what it could mean is that if there is an undesired > combination > > > the same should not be in the same pada of the same nakshatra as > > that > > > could mean compounded bad effects. But if the combination is good > ( > > > as in between benefic planets), the same may be considered good. > > > > Anyway good to know that you have seen examples before, so > there > > is > > > some emperical evidence. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Arun > > > > quietwolf1972 <quietwolf1972> wrote: > > > > > > > > There is no such universally applicable rule that I am aware > of. > > By > > > > placement in the same nakshatra pada, they will be in the same > > > house > > > > in both the Navamsa as well as Rasi, thus indicating a strong > > > mixture > > > > of the planetary forces. This can be sometimes good ... infact, > I > > > > know of many cases where this turned out well. > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > Krishna > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear memebers and respected gurujis, > > > > > > > > > > I have heard that 2 planets in the same nakshatra pada give > bad > > > > results. If yes what is the nature of the bad effects, when > will > > it > > > > be experienced. > > > > > Is this similar to the graha yudha rule whic says that when > two > > > > planets come very close to each other they get involved in a > > graha > > > > yudha. > > > > > If yes then in that case is Moon an exception to the rule > that > > 2 > > > > planets in the same nakshatra pada are bad as Moon is exempted > > from > > > > the graha yudha rule ( only non luminaries are considered). > > > > > > > > > > Hoping to learn from all of you, > > > > > > > > > > Pranams, > > > > > Arun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now > > > > > > > > > > > > Sponsor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- > astrology/info.html > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Terms of > > > Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now > > > > > > > > > Sponsor > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- astrology/info.html > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > > > Terms of > > Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now > > > > > > Sponsor > > > > > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > Terms of > Service. > > > > > > > > > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now > > > Sponsor > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > Terms of Service. > > > > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.