Guest guest Posted December 1, 2003 Report Share Posted December 1, 2003 Om krishna guru: Namaste dewavratji and narasimha and gurus I think the sequence mentioned by devavrat must be corrected as per listed in square brackets numbers. aries is a odd sign, ist hora belongs to sun and 2nd belongs to moon. scorpio is mentioned as daystron sign and aries is night strong as per the article. so ist hora of aries will go in scorpio and 2rd will go in aries. signs 1-12 are aries to pisces, and the sign numbers mentioned under hora I and HORA II also correspond to the same numbering sequence. Please correct my understanding > sign I Hora II Hora > > 1 1 [8] 8 [1] > 2 2 7 > 3 3 [6] 6 [3] > 4 4 5 > 5 5 4 > 6 6 [3] 3 [6] > 7 7 2 > 8 8 [1] 1 [8] > 9 9 [12] 12 [9] > 10 10 11 > 11 11 10 > 12 12 [9] 9 [12] > Ishwar vedic astrology, "dewavrat2000" <dewavrat2000> wrote: > OM NAMO BHAGAVATE VASUDEVAYA > > dEAR SHRI nARASIMHA JI, > > > I have gone through the excellent article on the Kashinath hora. I > twould have been better if you have given the table for the hora > calculations. I have attemted to make the same from the principles > given by you. Kindly correct me. > > sign I Hora II Hora > > 1 1 8 > 2 2 7 > 3 3 6 > 4 4 5 > 5 5 4 > 6 6 3 > 7 7 2 > 8 8 1 > 9 9 12 > 10 10 11 > 11 11 10 > 12 12 9 > > A similar type of hora chart was used by late Irangati Rangacharya.Is > it same chart or it is different from that hora division. He use to > apply the padakrama dasa for the same. Kindly correct my above > attempted table and guide me. > > When the cds willbe made available to us i.e. members in India. > > Yours > > Dewavrat buit > Nagpur India Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.