Parasara vs. Jaimini versions of Arudha Lagna

January 18, 2003

Hare Rama Krishna

Dear John,

It says:

"sutasthe janma"

Now using Katayapadi Varga:

Su=7, ta=6 =>67 => 67/12 = 7.

So this is a reference to the Arudha falling in the 7th.

Ja=8, Ma=5 => 58 => 58/12 = 10.

So that Arudha should fall in the 10th house.

Best wishesVisti---Bhagavad Purana: http://www.srimadbhagavatam.orgBrihat

Parasara Hora Shastra:

vedic astrologybphs.zipiTRANS 99 Font:

http://www.omkarananda-ashram.org/Sanskrit/Itranslt.html

-

John Rasonabe

vedic astrology

Saturday, January 18, 2003 10:17 PM

[vedic astrology] Parasara vs. Jaimini versions of Arudha Lagna

Dear Jyotishis,Thank you (especially for Gili who first noticed mystatement) for

explaining to me the exceptions indetermining the Arudha Lagna, according to

Parasara.However, based on Jaimini Sutram, Chapter 1, slokanumber 32 states

that "If the lord of a sign is in the seventh from it, that very sign

becomes its arudha"It appears that we have discovered a point of researchin

this forum.Regards,John R.--- Ramadas Rao <ramadasrao (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:> > OM

KLEEM KRISHNAYA NAMAH> Dear John,> Please refer to BPHS translated by Sri Sharma

(Sagar> Publications ) Page 422 on Bhava Padas.See 4-5> Special exceptions : He

says if the Pada happens to> be the sign's own house,the 10th house from there

be> treated as its Pada and when the 7th house be its> Pada ,the 10th from 7th

ie.,4th be treated as its> Pada.> The same thing has been explained by Sri

P.V.R.> Narasmha Rao ji in his book VA-An Integrated> Approach in pages 72 and

73 on Arudha Padas.> I hope now you are clear in this matter.> With best

Regards,> Ramadas Rao.> John Rasonabe <jr_esq > wrote:Gili,> > I have

not read this rule you're stating from any of> the texts I've studied. Perhaps,

you and the rest> of> the list can state the classical text or source that>

describes this rule.> > Regards,> > John R.> > > --- Gili Alvey

<gilimary (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:> > > > > > Dear John,> > Am I wrong in thinking

that AL cannot be in 1st> > (sunrise) or 7th (sunset) so > > we have to count

10 more signs if the AL falls in> > either of these houses?> > Love,> > Gili> >

> > you can't transcend what you haven't experienced> > > > > > > > > > > >

>John Rasonabe <jr_esq >> > >> > >The arudha lagna is determined

by counting the> > number> > >of houses the lagna lord is away from the> >

ascendant.> > >Then, count the same number of houses from the> > >location of

the lagna lord. In this chart, the> > lagan> > >lord (Moon) is located in the

7th house. > > Therefore,> > >the arudha lagna is the same as the lagna> >

.............."> > > > >

>>_______________> > MSN 8

with e-mail virus protection service: 2> months> > FREE* > >

http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus> > > > > > >

> > Mail

Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up> now.> http://mailplus.> >

Groups Sponsor> > Archives:>

vedic astrology> > Group

info:>vedic astrology/info.html> > To UNSUBSCRIBE:

Blank mail to> vedic astrology-> > ....... May Jupiter's

light shine on us .......> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri

Krishnaarpanamastu> || > > Your use of is subject to the

> Terms of Service. > > Catch all the cricket action. Download

ScoretrackerDo you

? Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up

now.http://mailplus.Archives:

vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-........ May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......

January 18, 2003

Dear John,

Please go through Sri Sanjay ji's book on Upadesa Sutras of Jaimini Maharshi .In

page No.15,Shloka 1.1.32 says SUTASTHE JANMA meaning if the lord of a sign is in

7th from it ,then the 10th house becomes Arudha..See as per KATAPAYADI Varga,the

first letter SA give 7 value and THA gives 6 value,so it becomes 76,reverse of

this is 67 divided by 12 ,the remainder gives 7,Again JA will give us a value

of 8 and MA will give a value of 5 and it becomes 85 and reverse of that is 58

divided by 12 ,the remainder gives 10.The next stanza is from Parasara and it

also tells the same the same as 10 th should considered as Arudha if lord of a

sign is in 7th.

I hope this clarifies your doubt.

With best regards,

Ramadas Rao.

John Rasonabe <jr_esq > wrote: