argala and Virodargala

[Guest guest]

Namaste to all...........

 

A student has asked me the following question and I too would like clarity on the points raised.

 

Subhargala is benefic intervention and papargala is malefic intervention...I

understand that. But is the nature of the intervention determined by the

"natural" nature of the planet or the "functional" nature of the planet in any

given chart? Also, does argala have relevance (with respect to the planetary

personifications) to the natural karakas of the planet involved, the functional

karaka of the planet involved, or the chara karaka of the planet involved? And

lastly, for house karakas, are these referenced by the natural karaka for any

given house, or the particular functional karaka for the house in question?

How do we determine the nature of the intervention with respect to natural

versus functional planetary states?

 

For example, Venus is a natural benefic. But for a Pisces rising, Venus is a

functional malefic. So does argala intervention by Venus in a Pisces rising

chart cause subhargala or papargala? And say that Venus is PK (charakaraka) for

children in this chart, but natural karaka for spouse, which personification

effects are relevant with respect to argala? And lastly, because Venus is the

8th lord in this chart, are the argala interventions relevant to (1) longevity

and/or troubles (functional); (2) spouse (fixed); or (3) children (PK - chara

karaka)?

 

Thanking all who take the time to answer.

 

Phyllis

[Guest guest]

Was that long time ago?

Have you seen new Q's?RegardsSanjay Rath <daivagyna (AT) sify (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

om aià huà hréà stréà gurursarasvatyai svähä

Dear Phyllis

comments below -

Yours truly,

Sanjay Rath

H-5 BJB Nagar, Bhubaneswar 751014, India

http://srath.com Tel:+91 674 243 6871

Phyl Chubb

[phyllis (AT) phyllischubb (DOT) com]Sunday, July 27, 2003 8:54 PMTo:

vedic astrologySubject: [vedic astrology] argala and

Virodargala

Namaste to all...........

 

A student has asked me the following question and I too would like clarity on the points raised.

 

Subhargala is benefic intervention and papargala is malefic intervention...I

understand that. But is the nature of the intervention determined by the

"natural" nature of the planet or the "functional" nature of the planet in any

given chart? [Rath:] Natural nature of the planet.

Also, does argala have relevance (with respect to the planetary

personifications) to the natural karakas of the planet involved, the functional

karaka of the planet involved, or the chara karaka of the planet involved?

[Rath:] All three. Natural nature has the highest relevance as all beings are

part of Narayana and Narayana can over-ride the strength of the chara

Atmakaraka. What is functional karaka?

 

And lastly, for house karakas, are these referenced by the natural karaka for

any given house, or the particular functional karaka for the house in

question? How do we determine the nature of the intervention with respect to

natural versus functional planetary states?[Rath:] You missed cara karaka in

this question..west coast. I have not heard of functional karaka. There are

three types - natural, fixed and temporal.

 

For example, Venus is a natural benefic. But for a Pisces rising, Venus is a

functional malefic. So does argala intervention by Venus in a Pisces rising

chart cause subhargala or papargala? [Rath:] It is subha-argala. Unless we

start believing that spouse is malefic! Basically it shows the intervention of

women. Parasara and the saints always felt that women were benefics and men

were malefics !!! See Venus and Moon are natural benefics, except when the

mother gets old (ksheena chandra) and then the effects can be quite malefic.

Men are the terrible affliction of Mars or Rahu or Sun. A miniscule portion of

them are from Jupiter.

 

And say that Venus is PK (charakaraka) for children in this chart, but natural

karaka for spouse, which personification effects are relevant with respect to

argala? And lastly, because Venus is the 8th lord in this chart, are the argala

interventions relevant to (1) longevity and/or troubles (functional); (2) spouse

(fixed); or (3) children (PK - chara karaka)? [Rath:] If say we are seeing the

wealth in the chart and use Jupite as the NATURAL dhanakaraka then Venus argala

is to be considered as natural signification of wife, spouse, women, daughter,

etc. If on the other hand we are seeing wealth from the CARA DARAKARAKA, then

the cara karakatva of Venus has to be considered. Use one system through out.

 

Thanking all who take the time to answer.

 

PhyllisArchives: vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......

Archives:

vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......