Guest guest Posted May 30, 2003 Report Share Posted May 30, 2003 dear satya ji i disagree with you most of neecha planet in a worldly sense give good result matrialisticly but no peace of mind and all nneecha planet in 2nd house do show a better result i have read this one of classic book in at some proffessor of a sanskrit at his house and he translate the effect rajinder--- Dr Satya Prakash Choudhary <satyaprakasika wrote: > > > Aum Namah Shivaya > > Dear group, > > To my knowledge none of the reasons cited on the > list so far seem to > be either appropriate or clear. While the principles > of one division > of Jyotish may be generally applicable to other > divisions, certain > principles of Muhurta or Samhita divisions of > Jyotish are not > applicable to Jataka. For convenience sake one may > categorize most > principles and significations as having been derived > from half a > dozen fundamentals. Firstly the natural zodiac with > the signs as > houses (aries first house, taurus the second and leo > the fifth etc). > Next is the rulership (lord of the sign). Then > nakshatra padas, > nakshatra rulers etc. Then derived significations > (like the 10th > being bad for parents as it is a maraka to both > parents, since the > 10th is the 7th from the 4th/mother and 2nd from the > 9th/father) and > so on. So what could be the principle behind Jupiter > in Leo being > inauspicious? First I will briefly outline the > essence of Muhurta > Chintamani, Rajamarthanda and Jyotirnibandha. > > > The period when Jupiter is in Leo or Capricorn or > retrograde or > atichari or conjunct the sun, is deemed > inauspicious. All the > auspicious activities that are avoided when Jupiter > or Venus is > combust, are to be avoided even in the above > periods. So too in a > paksha (lunar fortnight) of 13 days. > > Jupiter is deemed defective when it is in Capricorn > as it is > debilited. Retrograde and atichari refer to the > motion and speed. > What about the other two? Jupiter conjunct the Sun > or in Sun's sign, > are both inauspicious. While combust Jupiter is > inauspicious at all > times, Jupiter in Sun's sign (leo) is deemed bad > only in the four > quarters of magha nakshatra and first quarter of > poorvaphalguni. The > rest of Leo is acceptable to all parts of India > except the places > between the ganges and the godavari rivers, > especially in Kalinga > (from Rajahmundry to Souther Orissa), Gauda > (northern orissa to > central bengal), madhya desa (central India, and > gaur (gujarat). > Jupiter in the remaining parts of Leo is acceptable > in all other > areas to the south of godavari and north of ganges. > > Furthermore, if the Sun is exalted (in Aries), it > will not be > harmful to Jupiter in Leo. When the Sun is in Aries, > Jupiter in Leo > is deemed auspicious. > > Vargottama Jupiter in Leo is considered inauspicious > and rejected at > all times (Jup in Leo in both rasi and navamsa, and > this happens > only in the first quarter of Poorvaphalguni ruled by > the Sun. Each > nakshatra quarter is ruled by a planet which is the > basis of the > navamsa chakra, which shows the inner nature of > things). Some say > that Jupiter in Leo is inauspicious during the year > when the full > moon in the month of Magha happens to be in magha > nakshatra. > > In a nutshell, Jupiter in Leo is considered bad when > it is in magha > nakshatra, or 1st qrt of poorvaphalguni only. This > is said to spoil > Jupiter. But if the dispositor Sun is exalted, > Jupiter in Leo can be > auspicious. A vargottama simha guru can be very > inauspicious. > > > Thus Jupiter's inauspiciousness in Leo seems to be > more related to > Magha nakshatra and the dispositor Sun. > > > It should be remembered that just as in Mundane > astrology, even in > Muhurta, certain planetary combinations, aspects etc > influence > certain places more while other areas may be > relatively unaffected. > Recently someone raised the issue of Agni nakshatra. > There also, the > nakshatra rulers and their functions affect only > specific areas. > Consider this. Sun's transit in Agni nakshatra > (Rohini karte) is > said to result in intense heat. But is it applicable > in a place like > Australia when these months happen to be a > relatively cold season? > Sun's transit through various nakshatras and the > results ascribed in > Jyotish Samhita (mundane astrology) are not > universally applicable. > Even the texts indicate that certain results are > felt in certain > areas more markedly. It is unwise therefore to > extend certain > principles of Samhita or Muhurta to Jataka, though > generally > speaking various divisions of Jyotish share certain > common > principles. Such attempts should be done only after > one has gained > sufficient knowledge of the main principles of all > the six divisions > of Jyotish. There is more to all this. But I have no > time to go into > it now. > > Regards, > Satya > > Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook. http://calendar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.