Neutralizing influence of lordship of quadrants

[Guest guest]

Respected Jyotish scholars

 

There is a well known Parashara's principle - "Lordship of quadrants

(Kendra) has a neutralizing influence on the nature of planets. The

natural benefic lose the capacity to give benefic results if it is a

lord of quadrant while the natural malefics lose their capacity to do

harm."

 

I need some clarifications on this principle. I shall be highly

obliged for your thoughts on following points:

 

1. Whether this principle should be applied on the Ascendant

lord also or only on 4th, 7th and 10th lords?

 

2. Suppose Mars is a quadrant lord (for example, say it is 4th

lord for Capricorn Ascendant). Due to above principle, Mars's natural

maleficence will get neutralized. Now, if it is conjunct or

aspecting another planet or house. Can it still affect that planet or

House adversely in the capacity of a "natural malefic" only? Shall we

still say that Mars afflicts a particular planet or house?

 

That is another matter that it can still affect the aspected planets

or houses in the capacity of lord of two houses. I'm just trying to

understand the principle of becoming neutral as a "natural benfic"

or ""natural malefic" due to ownership of quadrant houses.

 

Best regards,

 

Shyaam Sunder Kansal

[Guest guest]

Dear Shyam Sundar Kansal,

I think you are refering to the Kendradhipati Dosha attracted by

Benefic(Natural) Planets, and its natural corollary.

Kendradhipatidosha is attracted by a benefic planet when it owns a Quadrant and

renders it ineffective to give good results and it can give bad results. It is

said that amongst them the Moon is the least afflicted and Venus most.This

dosha is nullified when the planet is posited in a quadrant owned by himself or

when in exaltation.

Similar is the case with the Malefics, in that they give good results if owning

Quadrants. But the effect is nullified when they are posited in quadrants owned

by them or in exaltation.

You will observe that generally Jupiter and Mercury do not give good results for

Gemini,Virgo,Sagitarius and Pisces, when they are not posited in their own Rasi.

The tenet applies even to the Ascendant. Conjunction does not remove the fact of

a planet being Lord of a house(Quadrant here) so the rule still applies.

You will find more elaboration on this point in Laghu Parashari(if my memory serves me right).

Chandrashekhar.

-

Shyaam Sunder Kansal

vedic astrology

Monday, April 21, 2003 1:35 PM

[vedic astrology] Neutralizing influence of lordship of quadrants

Respected Jyotish scholarsThere is a well known Parashara's principle -

"Lordship of quadrants (Kendra) has a neutralizing influence on the nature of

planets. The natural benefic lose the capacity to give benefic results if it is

a lord of quadrant while the natural malefics lose their capacity to do harm."I

need some clarifications on this principle. I shall be highly obliged for your

thoughts on following points:1. Whether this principle should be applied

on the Ascendant lord also or only on 4th, 7th and 10th lords?2. Suppose

Mars is a quadrant lord (for example, say it is 4th lord for Capricorn

Ascendant). Due to above principle, Mars's natural maleficence will get

neutralized. Now, if it is conjunct or aspecting another planet or house. Can

it still affect that planet or House adversely in the capacity of a "natural

malefic" only? Shall we still say that Mars afflicts a particular planet or

house?That is another matter that it can still affect the aspected planets or

houses in the capacity of lord of two houses. I'm just trying to understand the

principle of becoming neutral as a "natural benfic" or ""natural malefic" due to

ownership of quadrant houses.Best regards,Shyaam Sunder KansalArchives:

vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......

 

[Guest guest]

Jaya Jagannath

Dear Shyaam,

 

Kendradhipati is Kendra and Adhipati; where Kendra is the quadrants and Adhipati

is lordship. This is a blemish which is attached to benefics owing the Kendra.

Many say that with such dosha the benefics become Malefics. However, this is

not the case in truth. This only implies reduction in their beneficence of the

benefics. Here, the benefic owner of a quadrant is still a benefic and does not

become a malefic. Similarly, a malefic planet owning a quadrant loses out some

maleficence, but doesn’t become a benefic in true sense.

 

This dosha is negated if the planet is also well placed in a quadrant or trine.

Similarly, a malefic planet owning a quadrant sheds its maleficence and will

give very good results if placed in a Dusthana (Evil House). However, if the

malefic Kendra owner is placed in a quadrant or trine, the loss of maleficence

may not occur fully. For example if Saturn is the lord of the 9th and 10th

house for Taurus ascendant, its placement in the 12th house in debility will

give excellent results like power, position and a good career. If the malefic

is also the lord of a trine in addition to its ownership of a quadrant, then it

becomes a Yogakaraka producing auspicious results.

 

If the lord of a Kendra is placed in its own sign they constitute Mahapurusha

Yoga and the blemish of the kendradhipatya is nullified and such planet bestows

highest qualities of its tattva on the native.

 

Best Wishes

Sarajit

 

-

"Shyaam Sunder Kansal" <shyaamkansal >

<vedic astrology>

Monday, April 21, 2003 4:05 PM

[vedic astrology] Neutralizing influence of lordship of quadrants

> Respected Jyotish scholars> > There is a well known Parashara's principle -

"Lordship of quadrants > (Kendra) has a neutralizing influence on the nature of

planets. The > natural benefic lose the capacity to give benefic results if it

is a > lord of quadrant while the natural malefics lose their capacity to do >

harm."> > I need some clarifications on this principle. I shall be highly >

obliged for your thoughts on following points:> > 1. Whether this principle

should be applied on the Ascendant > lord also or only on 4th, 7th and 10th

lords?> > 2. Suppose Mars is a quadrant lord (for example, say it is 4th > lord

for Capricorn Ascendant). Due to above principle, Mars's natural > maleficence

will get neutralized. Now, if it is conjunct or > aspecting another planet or

house. Can it still affect that planet or > House adversely in the capacity of

a "natural malefic" only? Shall we > still say that Mars afflicts a particular

planet or house?> > That is another matter that it can still affect the

aspected planets > or houses in the capacity of lord of two houses. I'm just

trying to > understand the principle of becoming neutral as a "natural benfic"

> or ""natural malefic" due to ownership of quadrant houses.> > Best regards,>

> Shyaam Sunder Kansal> > > > > ------------------------ Sponsor

---------------------~-->> Make Money Online Auctions! Make $500.00 or We Will

Give You Thirty Dollars for Trying!>

http://us.click./yMx78A/fNtFAA/i5gGAA/.8XolB/TM>

---~->> >

Archives: vedic astrology> > Group info:

vedic astrology/info.html> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-> > ....... May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu

|| > > Your use of is subject to

> > > > >

[Guest guest]

Dear Sarajit

 

I'm cordially grateful to you for scholarly answering my question

about "Neutralizing influence of lordship of quadrants" a few days

back. I feel sorry that due to some problems in my system, I could

not respond immediately.

 

Best wishes,

 

Shyaam Sunder Kansal

http://www.howisyourdaytoday.com

 

 

vedic astrology, "Sarajit Poddar"

<sarajit@s...> wrote:

> Jaya Jagannath

> Dear Shyaam,

>

> Kendradhipati is Kendra and Adhipati; where Kendra is the quadrants

and Adhipati is lordship. This is a blemish which is attached to

benefics owing the Kendra. Many say that with such dosha the benefics

become Malefics. However, this is not the case in truth. This only

implies reduction in their beneficence of the benefics. Here, the

benefic owner of a quadrant is still a benefic and does not become a

malefic. Similarly, a malefic planet owning a quadrant loses out some

maleficence, but doesn't become a benefic in true sense.

>

>

>

> This dosha is negated if the planet is also well placed in a

quadrant or trine. Similarly, a malefic planet owning a quadrant

sheds its maleficence and will give very good results if placed in a

Dusthana (Evil House). However, if the malefic Kendra owner is placed

in a quadrant or trine, the loss of maleficence may not occur fully.

For example if Saturn is the lord of the 9th and 10th house for

Taurus ascendant, its placement in the 12th house in debility will

give excellent results like power, position and a good career. If the

malefic is also the lord of a trine in addition to its ownership of a

quadrant, then it becomes a Yogakaraka producing auspicious results.

>

>

>

> If the lord of a Kendra is placed in its own sign they constitute

Mahapurusha Yoga and the blemish of the kendradhipatya is nullified

and such planet bestows highest qualities of its tattva on the

native.

>

> Best Wishes

> Sarajit

>

> -

> "Shyaam Sunder Kansal" <shyaamkansal>

> <vedic astrology>

> Monday, April 21, 2003 4:05 PM

> [vedic astrology] Neutralizing influence of lordship of

quadrants

>

>

> > Respected Jyotish scholars

> >

> > There is a well known Parashara's principle - "Lordship of

quadrants

> > (Kendra) has a neutralizing influence on the nature of planets.

The

> > natural benefic lose the capacity to give benefic results if it

is a

> > lord of quadrant while the natural malefics lose their capacity

to do

> > harm."

> >

> > I need some clarifications on this principle. I shall be highly

> > obliged for your thoughts on following points:

> >

> > 1. Whether this principle should be applied on the Ascendant

> > lord also or only on 4th, 7th and 10th lords?

> >

> > 2. Suppose Mars is a quadrant lord (for example, say it is 4th

> > lord for Capricorn Ascendant). Due to above principle, Mars's

natural

> > maleficence will get neutralized. Now, if it is conjunct or

> > aspecting another planet or house. Can it still affect that

planet or

> > House adversely in the capacity of a "natural malefic" only?

Shall we

> > still say that Mars afflicts a particular planet or house?

> >

> > That is another matter that it can still affect the aspected

planets

> > or houses in the capacity of lord of two houses. I'm just trying

to

> > understand the principle of becoming neutral as a "natural

benfic"

> > or ""natural malefic" due to ownership of quadrant houses.

> >

> > Best regards,

> >

> > Shyaam Sunder Kansal

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

 

> >

> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> >

> >

> >

> > Your use of is subject to

 

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

Dear Chandrashekhar ji

 

I'm cordially grateful to you for scholarly answering my question

about "Neutralizing influence of lordship of quadrants" a few days

back. I feel sorry that due to some problems in my system, I could

not respond immediately.

 

Best wishes,

 

Shyaam Sunder Kansal

http://www.howisyourdaytoday.com

 

 

vedic astrology, "Chandrashekhar"

<boxdel> wrote:

> Dear Shyam Sundar Kansal,

> I think you are refering to the Kendradhipati Dosha attracted by

Benefic(Natural) Planets, and its natural corollary.

> Kendradhipatidosha is attracted by a benefic planet when it owns a

Quadrant and renders it ineffective to give good results and it can

give bad results. It is said that amongst them the Moon is the least

afflicted and Venus most.This dosha is nullified when the planet is

posited in a quadrant owned by himself or when in exaltation.

> Similar is the case with the Malefics, in that they give good

results if owning Quadrants. But the effect is nullified when they

are posited in quadrants owned by them or in exaltation.

> You will observe that generally Jupiter and Mercury do not give

good results for Gemini,Virgo,Sagitarius and Pisces, when they are

not posited in their own Rasi.

> The tenet applies even to the Ascendant. Conjunction does not

remove the fact of a planet being Lord of a house(Quadrant here) so

the rule still applies.

> You will find more elaboration on this point in Laghu Parashari(if

my memory serves me right).

> Chandrashekhar.

> -

> Shyaam Sunder Kansal

> vedic astrology

> Monday, April 21, 2003 1:35 PM

> [vedic astrology] Neutralizing influence of lordship of

quadrants

>

>

> Respected Jyotish scholars

>

> There is a well known Parashara's principle - "Lordship of

quadrants

> (Kendra) has a neutralizing influence on the nature of planets.

The

> natural benefic lose the capacity to give benefic results if it

is a

> lord of quadrant while the natural malefics lose their capacity

to do

> harm."

>

> I need some clarifications on this principle. I shall be highly

> obliged for your thoughts on following points:

>

> 1. Whether this principle should be applied on the Ascendant

> lord also or only on 4th, 7th and 10th lords?

>

> 2. Suppose Mars is a quadrant lord (for example, say it is

4th

> lord for Capricorn Ascendant). Due to above principle, Mars's

natural

> maleficence will get neutralized. Now, if it is conjunct or

> aspecting another planet or house. Can it still affect that

planet or

> House adversely in the capacity of a "natural malefic" only?

Shall we

> still say that Mars afflicts a particular planet or house?

>

> That is another matter that it can still affect the aspected

planets

> or houses in the capacity of lord of two houses. I'm just trying

to

> understand the principle of becoming neutral as a "natural

benfic"

> or ""natural malefic" due to ownership of quadrant houses.

>

> Best regards,

>

> Shyaam Sunder Kansal

>

>